On Wednesday’s Mark Levin Show, the media are ecstatic over Wednesday night’s debate and feel like Kamala Harris delivered a knockout punch to Donald Trump because to Harris this was a debate to her real constituency: the media. Harris was trained for this debate to appeal to the media that she has been avoiding and came ready with her cheap shots and 25 lies about Trump. We have no idea what Harris’s plans are for crime, immigration, or tackling inflation and reducing the prices of things like food, gasoline, vehicles, and housing – all things that affect the American people. There is no reason for Trump to have a second debate against Harris and the moderators, and the real losers are undecided American voters. Also, today is the 23rd anniversary of the 9/11 terror attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. America is less safe today thanks to a wide-open border and failing infrastructure under the Biden/Harris administration, and we need Trump now more than ever to protect and secure our country. Later, Rich Valdes, host of America at Night, fills in for Mark. Trump has every right to decline a second debate with Kamala Harris after the debacle last night, but it would be nice to see Trump expose Kamala again to the voters.
The Federalist
25 Lies Kamala Harris Told In Her Debate Against Trump
YouTube
President Donald Trump On Charlottesville: You Had Very Fine People, On Both Sides | CNBC, 2017
Photo by Win McNamee
The podcast for this show can be streamed or downloaded from the Audio Rewind page.
Rough transcription of Hour 1
Segment 1
Hello, America. Mark Levin here. Our number 877-381-3811. 877-381-3811. You know. I try to use logic and reason to draw conclusions. Of course, I’m a partisan for liberty, the Constitution, for our country. But that doesn’t mean you can’t really analyze things and then set it up into the format to advance your agenda and our agenda as a righteous agenda. Now. It’s very interesting, having watched the debate and then watching the discussions all day long on cable, reading about online and in newspapers where some of the surveys and polls go. The media are ecstatic. They feel Kamala Harris had a knockout punch and they are ecstatic. And I’m going to tell you why the media are ecstatic. This for Kamala Harris was a debate. A debate. For the media. That’s her constituency. That’s her partner. This was a debate for the media. She was trained over five days. You know, there dog trainers out there. There’s trainers for people to ride bicycles. There’s all kinds of. While she was trained for this debate. To appeal to the media because he’s been ducking the media. The media is in her corner no matter what. But the media are losing face. So it was a debate preparation, any debate for her, for the media. She had her one liners. She had her cheap shots. She had over 25 lives. We’re going to get into that. And that’s what her target was, the media. And that’s why even The New York Times. SOS today. But did she make any headway with people who are still on the fence, with people who still do not understand her positions? And the answer is no or mostly no. So the media are celebrating her because she attacked Donald Trump. Repeatedly, viciously underhanded. Lee lied about everything from Charlottesville to bloodbath and so forth and so on. And they got excited because the media. Unfortunately, in America today. Are populated with Democrat Party activists, former Hill staffers, former Obama Clinton staffers, Biden staffers, people who date them, people who cheat with them, people who are married to them. It’s a real incestuous relationship. So the meet media are mostly. A. A cesspool of reprobates. So they were thrilled. They were thrilled. But in order to win a debate and effectively win the presidency, you got to get votes. You got to get votes. As I sit here now. Almost 24 hours later. I cannot tell you. You cannot tell me. Nobody can say. What her plan is for reducing food prices. What our plan is for reducing gasoline prices. What her plan is for tackling inflation. What her plan is for reducing the price of automobiles and trucks. What her plan is for reducing the price of housing, not ending at 25,000. How are you going to reduce the price? These are five areas that are essential. To virtually every family, to virtually every person. This is how you sustain yourself. This is what the economy, the core part of the economy is all about food. Mobility, gasoline inflation, the value of money, the cost of things. Housing. And vehicles. And. You have no idea where she stands now. You and I do know that she’s a radical leftist and so forth, but she has to conceal that. So she had every opportunity to present to the American people substance. She didn’t provide substance on anything. She didn’t say a damn thing about what she would do to improve. The economic condition of working people, blue collar people, middle class people, poor people. Not a thing. Nothing. Zero. But the media were thrilled. But the media don’t matter. Undecided voters have no idea where she stands on the economy. None. Again, she’s a marxist. She’s a socialist. You and I know she wants to nationalize health care and turn it over to the central government. We know where she stands on all these issues. But undecided voters, many of whom are the uninformed voters. They don’t know about her past. They’re not focused on her past. They watched that debate. And they walk away still dumbfounded. No, I understand. The the reprobates on MSNBC and CNN. They don’t care about any of that. People in the media make enough money they can stuff their face with. But quiche. They can drive around in gas guzzling cars while preaching electric vehicles. Inflation doesn’t affect them. Housing prices don’t affect them and all the rest of it. They’re so completely out of touch with so many of you. Completely out of touch. Like Mika Brzezinski. There was a she was there. She was that she was there. She was there was absolutely fantastic. She didn’t say anything of substance. Nothing. So who cares if she wins the media scoring on the debates? Who cares? She was going to win that no matter what. And so the media celebrate again. Who cares if the media celebrate? Let’s look at immigration. What exactly is your plan to stem the flow of millions, tens of millions of illegal immigrants into this country? Some of whom are terrorists, some of whom are murderers, some of whom are would be murderers, rapists, you name it. From Venezuela, gangs, MS13. Fentanyl, killing 100,000 Americans a year. She said nothing. She would sign a bipartisan bill. That bipartisan bill isn’t going to pass because it’s not bipartisan, number one. Number two, it doesn’t do anything except enshrine current policy. Well, current policy is the reason why we’re having so much mayhem. Sex slavery. Women of children. Slavery like we haven’t seen since the end of the Civil War. A mostly brown and black people. What’s your solution? She has no solution. She’s the problem. So again, I’m sitting there, maybe undecided voter, maybe a low information voter. I didn’t get any information from her. She’s supposed to be talking to me so I can figure out who I am going to vote for. This isn’t a fashion show, if you will. Oh, I like her because, you know, we’re not running for student government here. Who is socially liked by the media, socially liked and who cares? And the third big issue, at least to many people, crime. What are you going to do about crime? She didn’t say a thing. Nothing. What is she going to do about crime? Nothing. She’s not going to do anything. She does believe in defunding the cops. She did fund a group. That provided money. For criminals, the most violent criminals imaginable in 2022 Get early release. So what is she going to do about it? We don’t know. So when it comes to the economy, when it comes to the border, when it comes to crime, she didn’t say a damn substantive thing, let alone a substantive thing that most Americans want to hear. Nothing. Nothing. But she won the media debate vote. They think she’s fantastic. Oh, my God. Did you see what did that clown on CNN say? What is that guy’s name? That Maoist guy? I forget his name. Van Jones. Oh, she spanked him and he came back for more. Okay. Okay. Mr. Mao. That’s Marxist. Very good. These people are out of touch. With who? They’re not struggling. That’s why they support her in the Democrat Party. They don’t mind what’s going on economically. They’re unaffected by it. They could close down every steel mill. They could close down every assembly line in this country, and they wouldn’t give a damn, even though it would eventually impact them that matter. They don’t care. They don’t care. So when it comes to three crucial issues, the economy. Immigration. And crime. She said absolutely nothing substantive. Absolutely nothing. Zero. I’ve got a lot more. I’ll be right back.
Segment 2
What was with her weird facial tics to. I mean, it all seemed so contrite and contrived, did it not? Smiling, putting her hand up to her chin. Open your eyes wide, Lee. You know she’s not her own person. She’s known her own person. Just very weird. Now, I’m going to tell you something. I picked up that not a single person I’ve heard or anybody who’s written has mentioned Lindsay. What’s her name? Davis. The female so-called moderator. These are two propaganda. This David Muir, man. You feel like you want to really, you know, condescending buffoon. Same with this Linsey Davis. She asked a question about the casualties in Gaza, and she used the 40,000 number without mentioning Hamas. Because ABC News, like the rest of the media, a pro-Hamas, if you’re going to use Hamas’s data, you’re pro Hamas. That’s simple. You’re going to keep trashing the commander in chief of the Israeli. Netanyahu, you’re pro Hamas. And by the way, before this debate, there was any single national network cable program that pointed out that there was a loud and fairly large pro-Hamas pro-Hamas. Protests going on outside the National Constitution Center. And I guarantee you are our founders are rolling over in their graves. pro-Hamas, they were carrying Hamas flags. Palestinian Liberation Organization flags. These are terrorists. Terrorists. And they were loud and they were outside and there was no coverage of it. None. The Philadelphia Inquirer did an article. It’s a radical left wing rag is the Inquirer. I know I grew up there and they pointed out there were protests. They didn’t mention that these people were flying. Palestinian excuse me, Hamas and PLO flags. And I posted the videos just to prove it to you on my social sites if you want to check them out. Mark Levin show dot com. It’s Mark Levin show at Twitter and elsewhere. The other thing is this. Let me pull it up here because I want to discuss this abortion issue. These two hosts, and you’ve heard it all day long, were grotesque. They were demagogues. They were propagandists. I wrote a whole book on this on freedom of the press. And they view their job not to elicit information that would be useful to the American people, particularly undecided individuals, but to drive home the case for an individual candidate. And so they know they cannot. They cannot provide a platform for Harris on substantive matters because if she’s truthful, everyone will see she’s a marxist Islamist. So they’re going to go ahead and let her skip, which which they did. They never followed up with her the questions. Why are you still asking about January 6th? Huh? January 6th. It’s amazing. We know why to set up and then to go to Kamala Harris. And and what do you think about it? You know, it’s just so pathetic. But anyway, I don’t think that mattered with anybody. But again, the media, they all live in a bubble. They have their bubble in Washington, their bubble in New York. In their bubble in L.A.. But these two people humiliated themselves. And, you know, I talked about this way back when Romney was debating Obama. Mr. Producer, you can vouch for this. And of course, we have audio, but I’m not going to bore you with it. Why do Republicans participate in debates where the media. Are the moderators, whether the referees. Remember I talked about this at length, Mr. Producer, a long time ago, and I’ve talked about the Lincoln-Douglas debates. How come they didn’t need a quote unquote, journalist as a moderator? Why why do Republicans do this? And President Trump shouldn’t do it either. They’re saying to President Trump another debate. I wouldn’t do another debate. Why would you do another debate? It’s such a waste of time. Why? So the so the moderators do the same thing. Everybody knows where Donald Trump stands. Everybody knows he makes no secret of it. He was one of the most successful presidents in my lifetime, one of the most conservative presidents in my lifetime. That’s the truth. And the country did very, very well by Donald Trump, as did our allies overseas, as did most Americans. So he doesn’t need to debate in order to reveal himself, his personality, his positions and so forth. Watch. Kamala Harris can go back on there and do another, you know, third grade student government act. No, I think you should forget about the debates and go on with the campaign.
Segment 3
On the anniversary of 9/11, we always give it the attention it deserves. And we will do that next hour. The proper attention. Now, this Charlottesville thing, since we were the first ones to correct it, they bring up Charlottesville and notice that neither two nimrods the bumps on logs who sat there as phony moderators, corrected Kamala Harris about anything, including that. And I want you to listen to exactly what Donald Trump said about Charlottesville. And then you can see how dishonest this is. I mean, again, why do another debate? There were at least 25 lies that the Federalist found. I lost count after a while. After about number 14, I lost count. There were no corrections. So it’s a complete setup. So why would you participate in that? Historically, debates are supposed to be between two candidates. You know, the media, more recently passed half century or so, has had a role. But there’s no need for the media to have a role because they’re outrageous. And again, she five days, seven days was stowed away in Pittsburgh to prepare for a debate for the media, for the media’s clamoring, for the media celebrating. And that’s why so many people who are undecided voters are still undecided voters when it comes to her because they don’t know where she stands, because she’s a marxist and an Islamist and she doesn’t want them to know. And they were thrilled that she kept attacking Trump. That’s the bottom line. Let’s listen to this very carefully. Go ahead and put in what you’re calling the alt left and white supremacists on the same moral claim. I’m not putting anybody on a moral plane. What I’m saying is this. You had a group on one side and you had a group on the other, and they came at each other with clubs and it was vicious and it was horrible and it was a horrible thing to watch. But there is another side. There was a group on this side. You can call them the left. You’ve just called them the left that came violently attacking the other group. So you can say what you want, but that’s the way it is. Fingers on both sides. So you said there was hatred. There was violence. I do think there’s blame. Yes, I think there’s blame on both sides. You look at you look at both sides. I think there’s blame on both sides. And I have no doubt about it. And you don’t have any doubt about it either. And I have. And if you reported it accurately, you would say you’re not sure until they start. They should have started Tuesday to protect themselves, as you know. And you had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people on both sides. You had people in that group. Excuse me. Excuse me. I saw the same. Stop right here. Stop right. This is where they cut him off. You people find people on both sides. Now he’s already explaining what he’s talking about. They were people who did not want that Robert E Lee statue that had been there for 150 years removed from Charlottesville, Virginia, was part of the Confederacy. A big part. Charlottesville was part of the Confederacy. There are old timers or people of ancestors who didn’t want that removed, not because they loved slavery or segregation, but because this had been in the center of town for decades. And they didn’t want the history of that area destroyed. By the way, I don’t want our history destroyed either. What are we, The Taliban? The good, the bad and the ugly? It needs to stand there and we need to learn from it. But anyway, go ahead. In that group that were there to protest the taking down of to them a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E Lee to another name or not. George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So. Well, George Washington now lose his status. Are we going to take down excuse me, are we going to take down are we going to take down statues to George Way? Now, what’s amazing about this is he deserves credit for being president because that’s what they’ve done. That’s what, 1619 Project CRT. That’s what the reeducation on American history is all about, destroying the founders, including the greatest. George Washington. And there he says it. What now? He was a slave owning it to tear him down. The answer is yes, he was right. Go ahead. What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? You like him? I do. Okay, good. Are we going to take down the statue Because he was a major slave owner. Now we’re going to take down his statue. So you know what? It’s fine. You’re changing history. You’re changing culture. And you had people and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists because they should be. You see what I am not talking about? The neo-Nazis and the white nationalists. How many times does he have to say the same thing? Go ahead. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Okay. And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly. Now, in the other group also, you had some fine people, but you also had troublemakers. And you see them come with with the black outfits and with the helmets and with the baseball bats. It was Antifa. Antifa came. Go ahead. A bad get a lot of bad people in the other group, which is fairly strong. I’m sorry. Just interesting. We were saying you were saying the press has treated white nationalists unfairly. Industry was out. There were people right there. Now, you know, he didn’t say that. You’re listening to the same thing. I am right, folks. That treating white nationalists fairly. Why are they seen how they put words in? And the irony of all this is the Joe Biden was a racist segregationist for a good part of his early career. Joe Biden’s run with these people. Donald Trump is never thrown in with these people. Kamala Harris threw in with Joe Biden. Kamala Harris is a Democrat. She’s part of the party that Robert E Lee was part of the party. Robert E Lee was a Democrat. Kamala Harris is a Democrat. Go ahead. But the night before, if you look, they were people protesting very quietly, the taking down of the statue of Robert Johnson. Anyway. Now, ABC News knows all this. Kamala Harris knows it, but they keep lying. And that’s why Donald Trump shouldn’t do any more debates, because it can’t be left to the Republican nominee to fend and fight with the other nominee. Plus, they have to play defense the whole night with a lousy, rotten, poisonous, cancerous American media. And the loser is we the people. The losers are the undecided voters who are trying to make up their minds and learn nothing about Kamala Harris. Nothing. And there was a time that they could have fact checked, but that they refused to do. They refused to fact check her. Just outrageous. I didn’t know there was going to be any so-called fact checking. But the Democrats, you know, she’s a liar. She gets up there and she says, you’re going to hear a lot of lies from Joe Biden. I predicted this yesterday, but it doesn’t take Nostradamus to do that because they project onto their opponents. There are two people with whom they disagree, their own sleazy immorality, lack of values and arguments. And so Kamala Harris did that with Donald Trump. That is project on him, her own mentality and her own and her own approach to things. I’ve got a lot here on abortion to. There was a bill that was introduced called the Born Alive Act. It was introduced by John Thune, who had a zillion co-sponsors, all of whom were Republicans. The Born Alive Act said, in essence. If an abortion fails or is botched, steps need to be taken to keep that baby alive. And this proposed law goes into the steps that should be taken. It was defeated by the Democrats. They killed the bill. So in Lindsay Davis says there’s not a state in the country that says. That if a baby is born. After the fact. That they can be killed. Well, then tell me what that federal law was going to be. Well, tell me why the Democrats opposed that federal law. In addition, the Democrats proposed a bill right after the Dobbs decision. To codify not Roe v Wade. To codify a a position that was so radical that even to Democrats. MANCHIN And the what’s your name from? From Arizona. I can’t remember her name. They had a vote against it. They voted against it, but all the other Democrats voted for it. It would eliminate every single regulation on abortion. It would eliminate parental notification. It allowed abortion right up to the head, exposing itself from the vagina. Just to be blunt. Abortion right to the end. And so she gets up. There and she does her drama thing. And the woman, Linsey Davis, says, Oh, what are you talking about? And so forth and so on. And Kamala Harris was really stumped at the end there when Trump said, Well, what do you do? Do you support abortion in the seventh month, eight months, nine months? And she wouldn’t answer. She voted for that bill. She also voted against the border, the borderline bill. So she voted that if there’s a circumstances, an abortion is botched. And a baby is born. She voted against a federal bill introduced by John Thune that would have protected that baby. She voted for a bill. That would have prevented all kinds of state regulations, state regulations, including parental notification. And partial birth abortion. She voted for partial birth abortion and she voted against parental notification. She’s an extremist. Donald Trump makes the point not to complicate it much further. He says over and over again, You can agree or disagree, but what he says is I will not sign and do not support a federal ban on abortion because the Supreme Court has ruled that it’s up to the states. And I favor three exceptions like Ronald Reagan. The life of the mother, rape and incest. But they keep insisting that his position is much more radical. That he’s going to send monitors out. Ladies and gentlemen, he was president for four years. Mr. Producer did. He said monitors out. Did he send out monitors to monitor abortions? Now he has a record. He was president for four years. And he said over and over again what his position is. But they are so desperate for that vote. That vote mostly comes not exclusively, of course, but mostly comes from single. Women without children. More specifically, unmarried women without children. That is their greatest core vote. And so they’re going to continue to lie about this no matter what. And, of course, the bottom line is and ABC News should know this. There’s been more abortion since Dobbs than before Dobbs. So you’d think the Democrats are happy, but they’re not. They need the issue. They need the issue. I’ll be right back.
Segment 4
Folks, just the announcement here. I’m going to try and get in 2 hours tonight to 8 p.m.. Rich Valdes is a great broadcaster, will pick up at eight and just trying to add a little more each each night. So bear with me doing the best I can here. All right. I don’t think I have time to finish this, but I do want to get to this. All of these these lies. The Federalists did a fantastic job of pulling a lot of this together in specific Sean Fleetwood. And let’s see. Let’s start middle class, kid. Harris claimed that she grew up in the middle class kids. Not true. In fact, Harris, his father was a professor at Stanford University while her mother was a biomedical scientist at the University of California, Berkeley. She was no middle class kid. Trump’s tax cuts. She falsely insinuated that the 2017 tax cut approved by Trump disproportionately benefited billionaires and corporations. Not true. Data produced by the IRS has shown that on average, all income brackets benefited substantially from this tax reform, not the top 1%. Three. Trump Sales Tax. Harris claimed Trump will implement a sales tax. He’s not pledged to do any such thing January six. Harris contended the January six riot at the Capitol was the worst attack on our democracy since the Civil War. Contrary to her claim, the January six events did not put American self-government in jeopardy, nor did it expose Americans to risks like those experienced during World War One, the Japanese attacks on Pearl Harbor, World War Two, to name a few. Nor did they. The Puerto Rican attack on the House of Representatives, where they shot two members. I mean, this is ridiculous. Project 2025. This is such a joke. Harris claim Trump will implement Project 2025 if elected. Trump has repeatedly said he has nothing to do with it. So why do they keep saying. Because they lie. Number six, just restoring Roe. When asked whether she supports any restrictions on abortion, she dodged the question State claiming that she absolutely supports reinstating the protection of Roe. Moments before that, however, Harris pledged to sign legislation such as the ill named Women’s Health Protection Act that I discussed with you already that would codify abortion on demand and eliminate all protections. Number seven, pro-life laws criminalize miscarriages and so forth. Harris claim that several states have Trump abortion bans, quote unquote, make a criminal for a doctor or nurse to provide health care. Threaten women with prison time and make no exception even for rape or incest. The life saving laws designed to protect thousands of innocents every year from elective abortions, however, do not do not criminalize treatments for a spontaneous loss or complications. In fact, every single pro-life policy on the books includes exceptions to protect them. Now, that’s just number seven. There are literally 18 more. But ABC’s news Pravda Al Jazeera ABC same family. I thought she was doing great. They’re excited.