On Tuesday’s Mark Levin Show, the Manhattan case against Donald Trump is a gross miscarriage of justice being executed by a judge and a government through their prosecutors, and if they do not figure out how to put this back in the box it will destroy the judicial system and our electoral system. The Supreme Court needs to decide if Jack Smith, Alvin Bragg, and Fani Willis can change the nature of our Republic and the separation of powers in our country. Also, President Biden threatened to veto a bill that would require the U.S. to supply Israel with weapons that they have already paid for before finally caving. Biden and Antony Blinken are funding the Iranians and protecting Hamas, and finally, Republicans in Congress have had enough. The rise in anti-Semitism by the Marxists and Islamists is intentional because the Bible is their kryptonite. Later, Mark speaks with NY Post journalist Miranda Devine to talk about the corruption of Antony Blinken and Robert Malley, as well as the agenda of George Soros and his family. Mark is also joined by Hung Cao about challenging Tim Kaine for his Senate seat in Virginia.
The Hill
Biden issues veto threat over ‘misguided’ GOP bill on weapons to Israel
Wall St Journal
Biden Moves Forward on $1 Billion in New Arms for Israel
CNBC
Fed Chair Powell says inflation has been higher than thought, expects rates to hold steady
Bloomberg
Overdue Bills Are Rising With US Debt Delinquencies, Fed Survey Shows
AP
Turkey formally opens another former Byzantine-era church as a mosque
Wall St Journal
Biden Breaks a 2004 Promise to Israel
Photo by BRENDAN MCDERMID/POOL/AFP
The podcast for this show can be streamed or downloaded from the Audio Rewind page.
Rough transcription of Hour 1
Segment 1
Hello America. Mark Levin here. Our number 877-381-3811. 877-381-3811. We have to squeeze a ten hour program into 3 hours. But I am a quasi professional. I can pull this off, you know. First this trial, Manhattan. You hear all the legal analysts. You trial Manhattan. So I got to thinking, watching this or watching people reporting on it, commenting on it. Many of them say the same thing and they say it brilliantly. The vast majority of them are right. And I’m talking about Fox. Forget about CNN and MSNBC. They were a joke. But I got to thinking. As I tend to as I’m reading two books at the same time. Mr. Producer, I’ve got one on my lap. I’ve got one on the end table and I’m watching the reporters on Fox as I’m preparing for the program. This is such a debacle. This case. It is such a humiliation to the justice system. It is such a grotesque miscarriage of justice. Being executed. By a judge. But the government through their prosecutors. That if there are any persuade of Supreme Court justices. In the immunity case. They have to watch this. And they have to compare it to the arguments that were made by Jack Smith’s boy, his lawyer by the Department of Justice. And scratch their heads. And say if we don’t figure out how to put this back in a box. We will destroy the judicial system. The judicial system will become the most political system in our country. The electoral process will be utterly unpredictable and subject to district attorneys and attorneys general and so forth, tampering with it by using the judicial system. And we own the Supreme Court. There’s going to be a a never ending conga line of cases that are brought to us on an emergency appeal basis. Do we really want to subject a judicial system that’s been pretty good, Not perfect, Pretty good over the course of the history, this republic. To the destruction that awaits it that couldn’t consume it if this isn’t stopped. I’m talking about the immunity case. Now, some of you out there, lawyers and non-lawyers who are really sharp, you’re thinking, okay, look, wait, the immunity case has to deal with actions taken. When a president’s president and then after he leaves the presidency, those actions are used perhaps in a criminal case against him, as they’re trying to do with Trump. That’s true. 100%. But the justices have to be thinking, okay, look. We had an argument here. By the Biden administration with their lawyer, the Jack Smith lawyer. And he argued, he argued specifically. That we have to trust prosecutors not to abuse the system. After all, their public officials, they take an oath. They believe in a public trust. They won’t politicize the process. They won’t do it. Argue. On top of that, when you take the Brad case, where a prosecutor is doing in that case and what a judge is doing in that case and the thousands and thousands of district attorneys and assistant district attorneys and county prosecutors in this country. Not to mention the 93 U.S. attorneys offices overseen by Department of Justice. And the ability to appoint special counsel. This thing can get way out of hand very fast. It already has. The justices have to look at the entire horizon here. What’s going on in Manhattan? What’s going on in Georgia? What Jack Smith has brought to this court, the same Jack Smith who was rejected by this court a decade or so ago, and the Bob McDonnell case involving Virginia and the governor there and how he destroyed him only to be reversed 8 to 0 by twisting the law and Jack Smith’s back. He’s twisting the law again. He’s demanding cutting corners on appeals. He’s demanding that the speedy trial act apply to the government, not to the defendant. He’s using every dirty trick in the book, and the court has to decide the Supreme Court. Are we going to allow Jack Smith? Alwyn Bragg. Fannie Willis. Those three. Are we going to allow them to change the entire nature of our republic, the whole notion of separation of powers? The poisonous cancerous destruction of our justice system because of these three individuals. These three. Are we going to allow? The court system, particularly the federal court system and the Supreme Court, to be dragged into every one of these disputes. That are going to be critical in a presidential race, a Senate race, a governor’s race, Who knows? Now that we’ve criminalized, criminalize the election process. Now that we have criminalized the entire justice system. Now that we’ve allowed prosecutors to run amok. To run amok. What are we the Supreme Court, going to do about it? Now they have a case right in front of them. They can’t just start ruling about all kinds of things, but they have a case right in front of them. This immunity case. And it is my hope. I won’t yet say belief, but it is my hope that any justices who are sitting on the fence watching what’s taking place. The Federal Bill of Rights shredded. With gag orders now, lack of due process. You don’t even know what the hell the crime is. You don’t even know. The witnesses are told 24 hours before evidence dumped into the trial. 30,000 documents. And still the judge moves on a conflicted judge. They have to be watching this. And saying, we can’t contribute to this. I don’t care what Kagan says. Or Jackson says. Sotomayor says. About their hypotheticals, the wild eyed hypotheticals. We don’t deal with wild eyed hypotheticals in the Supreme Court. We deal with reality. We deal with practicality. We deal with the Constitution and the facts in front of us and the facts in front of us tell us, look what’s happening in the country today. Is the problem that there aren’t enough prosecutors prosecuting a former president, 91 charge? You got 34 charges in this one courtroom, which are outrageous. You have a dead state statute that he’s trying to revive by claiming a federal offense that he will not describe. That requires intent. How can you have intent to violate a federal offense that you can’t describe? And there hasn’t been a shred of evidence. Five weeks. That the defended Donald Trump even knew about any federal campaign law. There is nothing on the record other than the testimony of a disgusting reprobate scumbag about what Donald Trump told him. Oh, okay, great. There’s no evidence of anything. That ties this to a federal campaign violation. And even if it tied it to the federal campaign laws, they weren’t broken. How do we know? Because the FEC said so. This is Alice in Wonderland in 1984, combined Alice in Wonderland and 1984 combined. So the question for the Supreme Court justices, other than the three radicals who were in the bag for Biden and the Democrat Party, the question for the other six. Is this? If you don’t reject this case out of hand. Because it is the federal criminalization. If what were previously normal regular historical campaign practices. With a separate set of electors. But contacting election officials. Notice they don’t have a single act of outright. Electoral or voting. Improprieties? Nothing. The act. Of sending a second set of electors the act. Of challenging an election. The act of saying an election was an accurate the act of asking, are there any more votes in the. You understand what prosecutors can do with this to anybody at any time? To allow Jack Smith to criminalize a process that is rough and tumble. It requires a lot of give and take. That is not the prettiest process in the world, but it is a free electoral process. That is addressed in any issues resolved by the political process, by the states, by the Congress, not by the courts, certainly not by the federal courts. Certainly not at the instigation of a criminal prosecutor. If they allow this immunity case to go forward. There will do severe damage to the electoral process. They will do severe damage to the justice system. Now. If it goes forward. And they rule based on the information that the government insists they rule on. And if they rule for the government, it’s over. The justice system will eventually collapse by the weight of the litigation. The electoral system will never be trusted again. And you have lawfare. For the rest of time. Times 1000. What’s going on today? Local judges, elected local judges, appointed federal judges, federal appellate judges, the Supreme Court. It’ll be nonstop and it’ll become much more difficult to figure out the boundaries. So now the court, as I speak to you, the Supreme Court, by the way, who else addresses these things the way I do, I look at what’s going on. I could tell you about the federal law I have. I could tell you about the state law. I have. I can tell you about Cohen’s testimony. I have. But it’s beyond that. It’s bigger than that. Much bigger than that. This Supreme Court, The timing is perfect, has a case in front of it where it needs to decide if it’s going to allow this sort of thing and even contribute to it. It has a prosecutor who’s unconstitutionally appointed by every. Serious analysis of his appointment. Two former attorneys general think so. Should a white. You have a case that has been criminalized, criminalize the political process. One of the allegations against Trump is the criminalization of free speech. Well, the Hitler Youth are running around doing pretty much whatever they want. Oh, that’s free speech. But not Trump. They’re going to take bad facts, the bad abuse of law, the targeting of Donald Trump. And they’re going to use that to destroy our country because Jack Smith says so. So what the court should do is, on reflection, the majority. Say this case. Should never have been brought here. The allegations, the criminalization of politics for sending it to the lower courts. We’re not accepting the way this case has been presented. We’re not accepting the lower courts embracing it. That would be a major move. I understand it takes courage, but we need courage. We need a Marbury versus Madison. We need. A Brown versus Board of Education. We need we need we need big ideas, big thoughts from big people who will do the right thing. We need a seminal decision. The justices are not equipped because nobody is equipped to do what Jack Smith is demanding them to do. To redefine to redefine the office of the presidency based on. Charges brought by Jack Smith. So the Manhattan case demonstrates, as many have before. No. Prosecutors are not to be trusted. That’s not the way the system works. Number two. A president has to have immunity after he leaves office. There will be no end to this. They will open the door to everything. And number three, this case in front of the court is an utterly bogus case. It attempts to draw in constitutional issues, and it does. The criminalization of politics is the destruction of the republic. I’ll be right back.
Segment 2
The House Republicans. God bless them. God bless him. Imagine if the Democrats controlled the House as well. I’m going to discuss this further after the bottom. The House Republicans have put together a Bill Shorten sweep. The vote on in the House and in the Senate to send a Biden. To compel him. To follow the law. To send the weapons to Israel that were paid for. The Democrat whip from Massachusetts looks like she hasn’t shower in about four years. She is whipping the Democrats saying this is a MAGA stunt. Minutes ago, Joe Biden put out a veto threat that if this passes the house and the senate, he will veto it. This is good versus evil. The Republicans versus the Democrats. Israel versus Hamas.
Segment 3
This is how you do it. This is how you do it, America. The Hill newspaper where the left wing, nonetheless. Brett Samuels Biden Issues Veto Threat Over Misguided GOP Bill on Weapons to Israel. Now I want you to understand how thoroughly committed the Biden administration is to Hamas’s survival. And let me add another thing. You know, there’s a war going on not just with Hamas, but with Hezbollah. You know, Hezbollah is firing maybe 100, 203 hundred missiles, maybe 500 a day into the state of Israel. How would we tolerate that? Seriously, would we tolerate that? Coming out of Canada? No, I don’t think so. And yet Biden and Blinken have told the Israelis, you’re not to go in there and clean this out. They’re funding the Iranians, they’re funding Hezbollah. They’re protecting Hamas. And the Republicans have said that’s enough. The White House said today Biden would veto a House GOP bill intended to pressure him to send weapons to Israel, calling it a misguided reaction to a deliberate distortion of the administration’s approach to Israel. Oh, right. The pushback comes ahead of it. Notice how the media do it. Biden’s first, not what the Republicans are doing. The pushback comes ahead of an expected vote this week. It’s actually going to be Thursday on the Israel Security Assistance Support Act. GOP lawmakers introduced the bill after Biden warned he will withhold certain offensive weapons from Israel if their forces invaded Rafah in Gaza And Blinken goes on the Sunday shows unchallenged, says there’s going to be more withholding. And bar. You only give arms to Israel if Israel destroys Hamas in Rafah. Arrogant schmuck. It’s go on. But the White House cautioned the legislation would undermine the president’s ability to execute an effective foreign policy. The president is finally violating the Constitution. I violated the Empowerment Act. He’s withholding is embargoed weapons to Israel that is in the middle of a fight for its survival. He’s giving aid and comfort to Hamas, who tonight could slaughter all the hostages and there would be no consequence of Joe Biden had his way. Iran moving ahead. Hezbollah moving ahead. The PLO moving ahead. Israel, they tried to create Israel as some kind of pariah state. The U.S. already paused a shipment of bombs to Israel earlier this month over concerns of a looming full scale invasion of Rafah. We’ve gone from Mr. Producer Biden and Blinken saying. Take out Hamas. To what? Temporary cease fire. To what? Permanent cease fire To what? Get out of Gaza. While missiles are being fired into the state of Israel. So Biden warns last week on CNN. That Israel is not going to get weapons. Precision weapons. Exactly what you need in urban warfare. So the House bill urges the expeditious delivery of defense articles and services to Israel, condemns the Biden administration’s decision to pause shipments to Israel and reaffirms Israel’s right to self-defense. It also calls for funds for the secretaries of defense and state and the National Security Council to be withheld until defence articles are delivered to Israel. Exactly. There is no slowdown, no embargo of moneys to Iran. Why is that? Well, I don’t know if I have time tonight, but I want to continue on what we discussed yesterday. But the left, the Jews and Israel. This massive anti-Semitism. With the Marxists, the Islamists. The Islamo Marxists, if you will. And you have significant Jewish individuals? Obviously, not exclusively. But look, there’s no denying it. I take no comfort in this. The anti-Semites out there love this, but I take no comfort in this. But the truth is the truth. And it is thoroughly, thoroughly. Proven. And so when you had people like Anthony Blinken. And you have people like. Bernie Sanders. Thomas Friedman. Their minds, their ideologies. Their lives. Are about Marxism or Marxism lite. It’s okay to have a Jewish state if it’s secular. Its boundaries are malleable. If it’s not stronger than all the other countries around it, in fact, because it’s a Jewish state and people there actually practice their faith, not all, but a lot, it is a hindrance to human progress. Don’t you see? A hindrance. Israel is under attack as I speak to you. They’re getting slammed with these missiles. They don’t tell you that almost a million Israelis have had to be moved from the northern part of Israel because these missiles are slamming in there. You don’t hear about that, do you? Not from Blinken. We’re going to have on this program and I’m excited about it, our friend Miranda Devine at 720. And she’s written brilliantly. But Antony Blinken, his ties to Soros. How he uses his position as secretary of State to advance a radical agenda source type agenda. This isn’t conspiracy theory. Look, these people are free to sue me, Mr. Producer, are they not? But they don’t. Why don’t they? Number one, I’ll kick their ass. That’s number one. Number two, I don’t give up. Number three, I’ll do Discovery. But number four, I’m telling you the truth. Truth is a complete defense. I’d love nothing more than to get into their finances in a civil case. Nothing more. But they don’t. Whether it’s CARE Students for Justice in Palestine. Soros So the rest. But this ideology. I talked about the other night. Marxism. The number one enemy. When it comes to faith, Marxism is Judaism. And yet you ask, and many of you do, and you make a good master. But what about Marks? He was Jewish. No, he was born a Jew. Wasn’t Jewish. What about Bernie Sanders? No, he was born a Jew. He’s not really Jewish. What about Noam Chomsky? Same thing. You know, we’ve talked about the Frankfurt School. I wrote about it in American Marxism. The Frankfurt School in Frankfurt, Germany, was a communist hotbed and out of there was born critical race theory. I wrote about it extensively. The five. Serious intellectuals. Who ran that school where? Communist. They had to flee Germany because of Nazism, of course. All five of them were Jewish conservative. Including her remarks. This helps build anti-Semitism against the rest of us because people say, well, look at that Jew over there. You don’t understand. That’s not what it is. These are Marxists and not really Jews. They’re Marxists. They’re born with certain last names. They’re born with certain heritages, but they reject them. They reject them. And so they prayed a false idols like Marxism. They’re not Jews. They’re Marxists. That’s how they view themselves. Now they’ll throw out, Hey, I’m a Jew, I’m all for it. But they better stop that. That’s camouflage. The Islamists. Love Bernie Sanders. If he walked through Gaza today, he’d be a conquering hero. Blinken has come to the protection of Hamas and Hezbollah and Iran. Soros has spent. Untold sums of money trying to destroy the state of Israel. Democrat Party billionaires, not all Jewish. Many are Gentile backing movements that you saw on our colleges and universities for the Hitler Youth. Biden didn’t tell them to stop. Look at Central and South America. Look up results led by a communist. It’s an anti-Semite. Look at Nicaragua. Ortega. Communist. He’s an anti-Semite. Look at JI in China holding meetings with Hamas and Fatah to try and get them to work together. The world’s biggest Marxist. He’s an anti-Semite. Why is that? As I explained last night. Judaism is 4000 years old. The Bible gets into the way of the Marxist. The belief in eternal truths, natural law, God given rights, the Ten Commandments and beyond. They are kryptonite to Marxists. And Islamists. Kryptonite. And so when people talk about the chosen people, the chosen people in the Bible. Evangelical Christians talk about this and so forth. And Christians, of course, talk about the return of Jesus. Jews talk about the return of a messiah and so forth. You get the point. You’ve got to strike at the core. If you’re a marxist and an Islamist in the core. Is Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. The core. His Moses. You must destroy the core. You must eliminate its followers. Or Marxism cannot succeed where Islamism cannot succeed. You look at Bernie Sanders. I’ve decided I’m going to do an entire monologue on him either this weekend or next on Fox. He goes to Israel. As I told you, he joins a kibbutz. He joins a kibbutz. As he joined a kibbutz because of the Jewish experience now. Because right there at that kibbutz. It’s a Stalinist communal. A Stalinist communal. Thomas Friedman of The New York Times. He, too, as a young man, joined a kibbutz. There was a radical Marxist kibbutz. He didn’t go there for the Jewish experience, quote unquote. He went there for the Marxist experience. Noam Chomsky. Same thing. Same thing. George Soros wants to remake the world. Kind of remake the world where you got to destroy Jerusalem. All these ideas about God and natural law and eternal truths. I’ve got to get rid of that or we can’t remake the world. The Islamists. Want to conquer the world. It’s not just one faith. It’s their. Practice of that one faith. And. Of course, there can’t be any. Discourse, this agreement of any kind. And so you have this fusion now of the Marxists and the Islamists you actually have. Antony Blinken, who is half-Jewish. To the extent you toss it all. Anthony Blinken. Defending. Forget about his words. His actions. Defending. So to the. The Hitler last stand. Like in Berlin. He wants to ensure that Hamas survives. With its four battalions. He does not want Israel to destroy them. He lies about the casualty numbers. The same administration that funded October 7th. The same administration that caused God knows how many casualties in Afghanistan, the same administration that’s responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans in this country because of its border policies. You’re being told to believe the Hamas numbers on the civilian deaths in Gaza. It seems to me an American death on the southern border is a result of our policies. It’s at least as important to Americans as that as a Gazan. Now, Mr. Minister. I’ll be right back.
Segment 4
So I want to thank you on behalf of this audience. The House Republicans are pushing this bill to force Joe Biden to comply with the law, to stop his embargo of weapons of our closest ally, to stop coddling the terrorists. And so guess what happens? This is breaking news from the Wall Street Journal news Department. US President Joe Biden’s administration has informed Congress just now that it’s moving ahead with sales of munitions to Israel potentially worth $1,000,000,000. The transfer includes up to 700 million a tank rounds and another 500 million worth of tactical vehicles and 60 million worth of mortar shells. Remember, this was already passed. The munitions are intended to replenish stocks used during the war against Hamas, though it could take years for everything included in the deal to reach Israel. In other words, they’re going to slow walk it. The report comes as Biden has faced pressure over his decision to freeze the transfer of large bombs. It’s not just large bombs, you bastard. Fears it could be used in Gaza City of Rafah. Yeah. God forbid if they destroy the enemy, God forbid. Keep the pressure on, boys. This is a fig leaf. This is a fan dance. Keep the pressure on and make the Democrats make them vote. I’ll be back.