September 19th, 2022

On Monday’s Mark Levin Show, the Democrat Party has a long history of racism and one of their leaders was Woodrow Wilson. Wilson re-segregated the federal government and separated Black workers with cages according to W.E.B. Du Bois. Others like, Jefferson Davis and Robert E. Lee were Democrats who fought to protect slavery and resisted ending lynching. FDR’s first SCOTUS nominee was KKK lawyer Hugo Black and he snubbed Black Olympian Jesse Owens from attending the White House. Then, Democrats are afraid to admit that they’re not trying to codify Roe v Wade, they’re trying to codify death. The Science in Roe acknowledged that it’s a viable child and Democrats don’t feel that Roe went far enough. Sadly, this is the most vicious form of population control seen anywhere on earth. Later, Democrats take to the media for damage control over the migrants that were voluntarily flown to Martha’s Vineyard and trashed Christianity and Republican Governors, while claiming that the migrants were ‘kidnapped.’ Bexar County Sherriff claims he will investigate DeSantis’ relocation of migrants to Massachusetts. Afterward, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton joins the show to discuss a recent big tech court victory and how Texas law allows county officials certain autonomy including district attorneys and sheriffs.

Photo by Hulton Archive

The podcast for this show can be streamed or downloaded from the Audio Rewind page.

Rough transcript of Hour 1

Hour 1 Segment 1

I hope you well. I hope you had a great weekend. You have been giving a lot of thought to the history of the Democrat Party in the history of the Republican Party, the Democrat Party has a huge history of racism, even beyond what some of you may know. And it’s kind of. Genuflected from. Sort of old time, horrific racism to now American Marxism, but as I’ve said many times, the ISM it doesn’t support is Americanism. Americanism, I want to tell you a little bit about Woodrow Wilson. Their bridges with his name on it, their buildings with his name on it. Princeton. He was governor of. New Jersey was president of Princeton at one point, but I’m mentioning this because of all the things that had been. Eliminated, torn down, scratched off as a result of ties to slavery. The Civil War and racism. The Democrat Party has not. The Democrat Party was the party of the Confederacy, Jefferson Davis and his generals were Democrats. There were Democrats, the Democrat Party fought. For slavery, the Democrat Party fought to divide the union. Democrat Party, even after the civil war, fought in the courts with Democrat judges to maintain. Segregation. The Democrat Party refused to ban. Lynching with a federal law. For the longest period of time. Fact, Franklin Roosevelt, despite the pressure from his wife, Eleanor. Refused to support one of the bill. He said it might hurt his support in the South for his reelection in 1936. Franklin Roosevelt’s first nominee and first justice on the Supreme Court was Hugo Black. Hugo Black was a lawyer for the Klan in Alabama, and I could go on and on, but I want to focus on Woodrow Wilson right now because the word doesn’t get out, maybe superficially, but it really doesn’t get out. And certainly it’s not taught in our schools. Woodrow Wilson resegregated the federal government. This is as presented by Vox seven years ago, Dylan Matthews, easily the worst part of Wilson’s record as president, was his overseeing of the resegregation of multiple agencies of the federal government, which have been surprisingly integrated as a result of reconstruction. Decades earlier, that is by Republicans. At an April 11, 1913, cabinet meeting, Postmaster General Albert Burlison argued for segregating the railway mail service. He took exception to the fact. That workers share glasses, towels and washrooms, Wilson offered no objection to Burleson’s plan for segregation, saying that he, quote, wished the matter adjusted in a way to make the least friction, unquote. Both Burlison and Treasury Secretary William McAdoo took Wilson’s comments as authorization to segregate. The Department of Treasury and Post-Office Department both introduced screened off workplaces, separate lunchrooms, separate bathrooms and a 1913 open letter to Wilson WBB Dubois, who had supported Wilson in 1912 election before being disenchanted by segregation policies, wrote, quote, one colored clerk who could not actually be segregated on account of the nature of his work and who subsequently had a cage built around them to separate him from his white companions of many years, unquote. That’s right, black people who couldn’t logistically be segregated. We’re put in literal cages. Outright dismissals were also common to just one hundred years ago taking office, Wellstone himself fired 15 to 17 black supervisors in the federal service, replace them with white people. After the Treasury and post office began segregating, many black workers were let go. The head of the Internal Revenue Division in Georgia fired all his black employees, saying there are no government positions for Negroes in the South, a Negroes place in the cornfield to enable hiring discrimination going forward. In 1914, the federal government began requiring photographs on job applications. In 1914, a group of black professionals led by newspaper editor and Harvard alumnus Monroe Trotter, met with Wilson to protest the segregation. Wilson informed Trotter segregation is not humiliating, but a benefit and ought to be so regarded by you gentlemen. And Trotter insisted that it is untenable in view of the established facts to maintain that the segregation is simply to avoid race, race friction for the simple reason that for 50 years, white and colored clerks have been working together in peace and harmony and friendliness. Woodrow Wilson admonished him for his tone. He said if this or if this organization is ever to have another hearing before me, it must have another spokesman, your manner offends me, your tone with its background of passion. Well, it’s worth stressing that Wilson’s policies were racist even for his time. Presidents Teddy Roosevelt and William Howard Taft had much better were had been much better about appointing black statesmen to public office and other political figures, including whites, attacked Wilson’s moves towards segregation. The influential pro civil rights journalist Oswald Garrison Vuillard wrote that the Wilson administration, quote, has allied itself with the forces of reaction and put itself on the side of every torture, of every oppressor, of every perpetrator of racial injustice in the south or the north. And he further attacked it for its political stupidity. He said the administration is put into the hands of the Republican Party. An issue which, if they have the sense to use it, may be just the touchstone they are seeking. Villa was taken seriously by the White House, which tried to court him on the issue and offered hints that it might be changing its tone. He met with Wilson and corresponded with them on racial issues numerous times. But the segregation policies were never reversed. He goes on, Wilson’s racism even extended to foreign affairs while they’ve been customary to appoint black ambassadors data in Santa Domingo, the Dominican Republic. Wilson didn’t do that either. And as the overside convention in 1919, Wilson helped kill a proposal from Japan calling for the treaty to recognize the principle of racial equality. And while 11 out of 17 members at the meeting, considering the amendment favored it, Wilson, who is presiding, arbitrarily decided the amendment had been defeated because the vote wasn’t unanimous. This wasn’t an actual rule that the proceedings were operating under a simple majority was enough to decide that the League of Nations would be headquartered in Geneva. Wilson just really didn’t want the treaty to recognize racial equality and wanted to appease the British Empire, which was premised on subjugating African and South Asian people. Well, someone was governor of New Jersey when he became president in 1913, but he’d been born in Virginia and raised in Georgia and South Carolina. He was historian William Calgro notes the first southerner elected to the presidency since Zachary Taylor in 1848. Southern racists accordingly rejoiced his election. Washington was flooded with revelers from the old Confederacy, whose people had long dreamed of a return to the glory days. Rebel yells and the strains of Dixie reverberated throughout the city. Wellstone himself was the descendant of Confederate soldiers he identified deeply with the Lost Cause narrative, according to which the Confederacy was a government of noble men trying to preserve a decent agrarian way of life against crude northern industrialists rather than a separatist movement premised on white supremacy. Historian Wesley Moody describes Wilson’s most famous book as an act as an academic, a history of the American people as steeped in lost cause mythology. And the book was generally sympathetic to the Ku Klux Klan, describing them as men. Half outlaw denied the suffrage without hope of justice in the courts. Who meant to take this means to make their will felt. This means being violence and intimidation. And the following quote from the book even made it into the movie, The Birth of a Nation, D.W. Griffith’s infamous feature valorizing the Ku Klux Klan as saviours of the South. But this was a quote in the movie, but from Woodrow Wilson’s book, quote. The white men were roused by a mere instinct of self-preservation until at last there had sprung into existence a great Ku Klux Klan, a veritable empire of the South to protect the southern country. Woodrow Wilson. That’s one I think this is a misrepresentation of Wilson’s views. The birth of a nation actually cut off the most racist part of the first half of the quote. The first half of the quote. The white men of the South were aroused by their mere instinct of self-preservation to rid themselves by fair means or foul of the intolerable burden of government sustained by the votes of ignorant Negroes and conducted in the interest of adventurers. And that was only the last of three Wilson title cards in the film, this one came first. Wilson again, adventures swarmed out of the north as much of the enemies of the race as the other cause and beguile and use the Negroes in the villages. The Negroes were the office holders, men who knew none of the uses of authority except in influences. And then this from Woodrow Wilson. The policy that congressional leaders brought a veritable overthrow of civilization in the South and their determination to put the white south under the heel of the black south. For his part, Wilson lent the birth of the nation his approval by screening it at the White House. Elsewhere in the book was an attack reconstruction on the grounds that the dominance of an ignorant, inferior race was justly dreaded, quote unquote. And he was strongly against black suffrage. The end of reconstruction, he said Negro rule under unscrupulous adventurers have been finally put an end to in the South and the natural inevitable ascendancy of the whites, the responsible class established. Wilson’s racism was the matter of a few unfortunate remarks here. There was a core part of his political identity, as indicated both by his antiblack policies as president. And by his writing before taking off, it’s completely accurate to describe him as a racist, a white supremacist, and condemn him accordingly. Did you know that Mr Is. So in 2015. The students at Princeton wanted to remove Wilson’s name. From the university. And here was this tweet. Insanity breaks out at Princeton now Woodrow Wilson is a racist pig enough stand firm President Eisgruber. November 19, 2015, you know who wrote that, Mr. Bluesier. Joe Scarborough, because Joe never knows what he’s talking about and he has a very big mouth. I could give you the history of Wilson, I could give you the history of Roosevelt. FDR would not allow Jesse Owens to visit the White House with the other. Gold medalists from the 1936 Berlin Olympics, he was not invited. He didn’t receive a telegram. He was snubbed by FDR. Consider what Lincoln did after his speech. In 1864, consider what Lincoln did, I guess, 1865, his second inaugural, there was Frederick Douglass trying to get into the White House and get into the room where Lincoln was and the army stopped him. And what did Lincoln do? He said, no, no, no, let that gentleman through. That’s my friend Frederick Douglass. And he asked Frederick Douglass how his speech won and Douglas praised it. How do we know? Because this is what Frederick Douglass wrote down about his meeting with Lincoln. FDR was no Lincoln. Even 80 years later, I’ll be right back

Hour 1 Segment 2

Now, Woodrow Wilson, there’s a reason for this. History is important. Woodrow Wilson was among the top, I would say three, certainly the top five intellectuals of the so-called progressive movement that is early American Marxism. They rejected the Declaration of Independence. You can see why. You can see why he’s been. Celebrated and embraced. Really for decades and decades by the Democrat Party only now. Do they seek to rewrite his history? But all that said. Well, this is not the only one, and it’s not just quote unquote, southerners, it’s northerners do. You can’t find any president, Republican president is anything like or close to what Wilson wants. I’ll be right back.

Hour 1 Segment 3

You know, I got to tell you folks something, and I think you can see it now to one of the reasons I use this platform and my books. One of the reasons one of the reasons this is important to me is to try and push the national debate before the book American Marxism came out. People weren’t talking about Marxism, nor were they talking about. Economic socialism. Oh, they mention it here and there, but more and more people are trying or people are figuring out. The Marxist fundamental foundation to the Democrat Party, to the arguments they make, even to economic socialism. Critical race theory to all these things, I can see Fox nations working on it now, this is very, very important. We talked about the classrooms, the parents movement. This is very, very important. And just so you know, I don’t let grass grow under my feet. My wife would tell you this, I’m working on another book. It’s a tremendous amount of work. I’ve been spending months thinking about it, writing notes to myself, drafting, ripping it all up, starting all over again, as I did with American Marxism. But it’s very important that people know what’s taking place. It’s like liberty and tyranny, which was the foundational book for. The Tea Party movement. Or the Liberty Amendments, the foundational book for the Article five movement. Now, I understand I’m not going to get these glowing write ups and so forth, and I’m not trying to pat myself on the head, I’m telling you, you’re in the right place. I don’t just do hit and run radio. I’m not Henny Youngman here cracking jokes left and right. Now and then, I like to crack a joke, we all like to have a good time, but I think this stuff through and I use this platform, I think, differently than most. Why did I read you this story about Woodrow Wilson? Because the Democrat Party is fundamentally evil. It’s fundamentally anti-American. But you look at the civil war, whether you look at reconstruction, whether you look at post reconstruction. In the late eighteen hundreds, Plessy vs. Ferguson, what do you look into the early nineteen hundreds with the likes of Woodrow Wilson, whether you look into the 30s and 40s with the likes of Franklin Roosevelt, was no friend of blacks or Jews or Asians, period. Then when you look in the 1950s in the segregationists and you look at the 1960s and the filibusters against the 1964 excuse me, the 1964 and 65 Civil Rights Act. And then you look today. Where they’ve abandoned that approach, the party has the Democrat Party, but they’ve embraced another miserable approach. And so you hear all this talk about white supremacy now, white domination, now critical race theory, you hear all this anti family stuff and anti faith stuff and open borders. So that party has genuflected. But it’s still embraces evil. It’s still invasive alien ideologies and doctrines, it still rejects the Declaration of Independence, which is the the formal consensus statement of the founding of the nation. It still rejects the Constitution. And so. This is very, very important to understand and for us to discuss at length. So that’s why I talked about Woodrow Wilson, because most of you don’t know about Woodrow Wilson, and yet he was a leading founding father of this American Marxist movement. Of this American Marxist when we know when Marx died in 1883. His writings weren’t that. Wide spread mean, he wrote a lot in angles, wrote a lot. His writings weren’t all that influential except with a relative handful of goons and so forth. Wasn’t in it till later. When individuals embraced it and started to promote it, including here in the United States. And there were many. And I wrote about them and rediscovering Americanism and the tyranny of progressivism. But Woodrow Wilson was among them. He was among them, he was one of their intellectuals, one of their scholars. And this was the new wave of indoctrination. This was the new ideology. Which they call progressivism first, they called it populism and then they call it progressivism. And you hear the strain of the same arguments out of Joe Biden’s mouth, who was also a racist. And has a long history of being a racist, not just in what he says, but in what he did. And then he decided the better way. To gain power and keep power. Was to repackage. And so now he is the most prominent. Voice. Or I should say body through which entity, through which this American Marxism operates, his administration, his regime. This is very important to understand. Now. Let me move to a few other issues here. Lindsey Graham has taken a lot of heat because he’s proposing and this is something he proposes every year to. A national ban on abortion, I think it’s up to the 14th and 15th week, and he did it again a week or two ago, and because the media are positioning the Democrats as pro women. Graham’s coming under. A lot of heat, an attack. We want to discuss inflation, we want to discuss the border, we want to discuss crime, we don’t want to discuss abortion, and we don’t want to defend Trump and we don’t want to do all these other things. Now, ladies and gentlemen, who are we and what are we? This is all McConnell ism. We’re supposed to push fiscal conservatism, and yet most Republicans in Congress aren’t fiscal conservatives, despite what they say. They spend like drunken sailors. The problem is the Democrats spend like drunken Marxists. So I’m just speaking frankly with you. When the spending was going on the last several years, you only heard from one voice behind this microphone condemning it, everyone thought it was a boring subject. Let’s get on with other stuff while there’s a lot to talk about. But that was always important to talk about. Always. And always is. So now they’re all fiscal conservatives. I do think we need to run on inflation and run on all these issues, we need to win Congress, both houses. But we ought not abandon our principles. What else shouldn’t we talk about that we believe in? The problem is Republicans don’t know how to talk when it comes to abortion, they should focus on where the Democrats are most vulnerable, where are they most vulnerable? They don’t believe on any limits. That’s not where Roe vs. Wade said or Casey versus Planned Parenthood. They believed in limits. The Democrats don’t believe in limits, and what they want to do is impose on the entire country abortion right up to the last second, a birth. And Republicans should seize on that. Because the vast majority of America does not support that, and that’s why you don’t see a single poll from any cable channel, from any newspaper, from any university asking the question, the real question, do you support the Democrat position that abortion should be legal right up to birth? That’s their position. Not codifying Roe, codifying death. And what’s the science say about that? The science says it’s a baby. When you’re about to give birth, it’s a baby, there’s no dispute in that. But it undermines the entire area. So you won’t hear Jake Tapper talk about this. You won’t hear Nicolle Wallace talk about this. You won’t hear Joe Scarborough talk about this, you won’t hear the reprobates, malcontents and miscreants dressed up as hosts and guests. On these cable shows, talk about it. You won’t see it written up in The New York Times or The Washington Post, you won’t see it discussed on the Sunday shows. That I discuss it all the time. Because it’s important to understand what the Democrats actually stand for, the most radical. Most radical form. Population control anywhere in the world. We don’t treat dogs this way. But here’s the problem with Lindsey Graham’s proposal. Professor Glenn Reynolds has written about him, and he’s 100 percent correct, and I’ve mentioned this to. The federal government does not have the authority to do what Lindsey Graham wants to do. It’s left to the states exactly as the Supreme Court said, Congress doesn’t have plenary power to pass laws and everything it wants. Its actions must to have some basis in some part of the United States Constitution. Article one, as Glenn Reynolds points out, spells out a long list of things Congress can do, but the list, while long, is an all embracing Congress has the power to lay and collect taxes, borrow money, declare war, establish post offices and post roads, etc. But wide latitude isn’t the same thing as carte blanche. The farthest reaching power of Congress is the power to regulate commerce among the several states, quote unquote, even since Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal or more accurately, ever since he threatened to pack the Supreme Court, the high court has given Congress wide latitude in regulating what has come to be called interstate commerce. As recently as the 1990s, though, the argument that the Commerce Clause would authorize an abortion ban as a regulation of commerce among the several states would have had some force. It even then, many federalised, many of us would have said no, but since that time, the Supreme Court has spoken. It has agreed, holding repeatedly now that Congress has power under the Commerce Clause extends only too well the regulation of commerce. We have a 1995 case called the United States vs. Lopez. And we have subsequent cases. And so is regulation of abortion, the regulation of commerce among the several states, it’s hard to see how abortion is an interstate commerce that takes place entirely in one state. And regulation of medical procedures is traditionally the domain of the states, not the federal government. So it’s a very weak, if not fatal argument to say under the quote unquote, commerce clause. I would argue that you could even drive the abortion issue through it. So I would say this bill is unconstitutional and any bill like it is unconstitutional, including if the Democrats pass a bill. That states in all cases, abortion will be permitted, whether or not any state likes it or not and so forth and so on. Congress doesn’t have the power. To codify abortion. And Lindsey Graham’s bill, whether you support it or not, is unconstitutional. So the Democrat vote for abortion for anything, any time, even up to the last second before birth is unconstitutional. And Lindsey Graham’s proposal, which is not radical in the least, most European countries have done exactly what Lindsey Graham is proposing, which is probably why he’s doing it. Have embraced his his idea, but they don’t have our Constitution. So it’s left to the states, so when you have people out there saying abortion is my number one issue. So I’m voting for Democrats at the national level. Why? Number one, they can’t do a damn thing about it. And number two, you sure you support them? Because do you understand what they support? Particularly those of you who’ve had children. Do you know what happens to abort a baby? Before birth. They take a syringe that’s about 12 inches long and they shove it into the soft spot at the top of the head. They have to kill it in the womb. And they drain the brains out. And killing. You know how badly that baby suffers. Just because you don’t hear it scream. You know how agonizing that is your own flesh and blood. It makes me cringe. The Democrats support abortion, including up to that point, and we even had one, and I’m sure there are others. Used to be the governor of Virginia who supported infanticide. Be careful what you vote for, ladies. I’ll be right back.

Hour 1 Segment 4

We’re talking about Wilson and the Democrat Party. We talked about abortion. Now, let’s talk about Planned Parenthood. If we only had an honest media in this country, things would be quite different that the greatest danger we face the corrupt media. Planned Parenthood was founded by a woman. Who was a racist, just like Woodrow Wilson? She promoted abortion. Planned Parenthood, the organization she founded. Because she wanted to see more black babies aborted and mentally handicapped, handicapped and physically handicapped. That’s where abortion got its real birth, so to speak, in this country. By another racist. And she had ties to the clan to she spoke at a clan major convention and event and did from time to time, she was very popular. Her name was Margaret Sanger. So the Democrat Party and this obsession with abortion has existed for over 100 years. So, again, I would encourage those of you who just think this is a simple yes, of course I’m for it. You need to think you need to understand what’s going on. I’ll be right back.