On Friday’s Mark Levin Show, the constitutional case for the 2020 election in Pennsylvania that was brought by Greg Teufel and Julie Levin scored a victory today in the state’s Commonwealth Court. The court ruled that the practice of no-excuse mail-in ballots, put in place by Democrats right before the 2020 election was unconstitutional. This case was initially dismissed outright by the U.S Supreme Court despite being meritorious. Attorney Greg Teufel joins the show to discuss his big win for liberty. This is a real David versus Goliath story. The law Teufel challenged (Act 77) included expanded mail-in voting and absentee voting in a manner that was unconstitutional. Teufel argued that the doctrine of latches did not apply in this case and won. The case now heads to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court for appeal. Then, as more and more officers are shot at by criminals, the widow of slain NYPD Officer Jason Rivera spoke at his funeral and called out the pro-crime progressive prosecutors that fail to keep people safe. Cops are human and they come in every race across this country. Later, George Soros is pumping more money into a new Political Action Committee that will be led by his son Alexander Soros. They will be supporting congressional Democrats and Democrat secretaries of state. While they fight to reverse gerrymandering the practice was created to ensure representation for African American voters, yet the Democrats use gerrymandering to ensure victories for Democrats who are usually White. Afterward, President Biden should be impeached from the office of President of the United States. The House must look into impeachment and/or the use of the 25th Amendment. The border crisis alone is enough for impeachment, but there are so many other issues.
THIS IS FROM:
Just The News
Pennsylvania Senate Republicans score court victory in elections investigation
Rumble
Widow of Fallen NYPD Officer: We’re Not Safe Anymore With New DA
Just The News
Liberal megadonor Soros pumps $125 million into super PAC to help Democrats in 2022 midterms
Breitbart
DCCC Endorses Aggressive Gerrymander to Leave New York with 3 GOP Seats
Breitbart
Ukraine Releases Photos of President Zelensky After Controversial Biden Phone Call
The Post Millennial
White House urged to release transcripts of call with Ukraine after Biden allegedly told to ‘calm down’ over Russian invasion remarks
Reason
The Gretchen Whitmer Kidnapping Plot Looks an Awful Lot Like Entrapment
The podcast for this show can be streamed or downloaded from the Audio Rewind page.
Image used with permission of Getty Images
Rough transcript of Hour 1
Hour 1 Segment 1
No doubt by now you’ve heard of the fantastic Common Pleas Appeals Court decision in Pennsylvania. Matter was immediately appealed to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania with the same reprobate set who no doubt will cause problems. But I read this 52 page decision by this court in Pennsylvania and it was outstanding. And these are the two cases I’ve been talking about over and over and over and over again that have been utterly ignored by the media, utterly ignored even by our allies. I totally ignored by the Democrats and and the Never Trump are saying, oh, they bring these cases, they bring these cases. These are important, very, very important constitutional cases. I see there are slip and fall ambulance chasing lawyers out there, too, we’re trying to take credit for the hard work of of other lawyers, the lead litigator in this case who argued the case in front of the Pennsylvania appellate court. His name is Greg Tufo, founder of Odjick Law. He will be on the program at 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time. I know him. My wife, Julie, has worked with the team of lawyers who worked on this case, unsung heroes, volunteers for the most part, who are mocked. You’re bringing in these volunteers against this great these great law firms. Let me tell you something, Greg Tofile, who’s basically a single practitioner for the most part, and the team of volunteers, he had several young people and my young wife, while she only two years younger, but I consider a lot younger and others who worked on this case. For free, because they’re believers in the rule of law and the federal constitution, as well as the Pennsylvania Constitution, what happened here, ladies and gentlemen, was that there is a an act called Act 77. And I’m giving you the very bare basics, because the the key lawyer himself will be on the program in a couple of hours and the act was passed and it was unconstitutional because it attempted to displace the constitution of Pennsylvania, which required an amendment, an amendment by the people to change the voting system. It is very difficult to change the voting system in Pennsylvania, which is why they went to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, five to two Democrats. And they’re not just appointed, they’re elected. So you can see what we’re dealing with. These are Biden Democrats. Most of them were elected by by public sector of big labor, by the teachers unions, bought and paid for, if you will. And so today, David beat Goliath. Today, the media can no longer say while they bring these cases in, they’re meritless regardless of what the state Supreme Court does. And if the state Supreme Court violates the state and federal constitution again, as it has before, then this case will be, well, they need to bring the case to the U.S. Supreme Court and let us hope that this time. The U.S. Supreme Court will take the case, this is the case, this is the case, one of two that was brought to the U.S. Supreme Court. And they bailed. And they built this act, 77 was unconstitutional. They don’t allow this kind of widespread. Absentee voting in Pennsylvania as a matter of constitutional law. The Dropbox’s and the other changes made literally within days of the election. Now, I want to say this as loud and as clear as I possibly can. This is a perfect example of the corruption that affected potentially the outcome of the results in the state of Pennsylvania. No question about it, or why would the Democrats in that court have done what they did? If they felt that the results weren’t going to be change, why bend their constitution into a pretzel? And this wasn’t just any opinion, it was a strong opinion and the majority in this case had some strong words for what was done. And so there you go, ladies and gentlemen, in case I’ve been talking about. That I’ve said on TV, that I’ve said on live in TV, on Fox, behind this microphone was a meritorious case, a very, very important case. And there was a sister case. A sister case that the Supreme Court should also have taken the U.S. Supreme Court. That no governor, no board of election, no secretary of state and no state supreme court, particularly a rogue court like the Pennsylvania court, just like the 2000 court in Florida, has the power to change the federal constitution. And if both of these cases have been taken up timely by the U.S. Supreme Court, I believe I cannot know with certainty. I believe the results in Pennsylvania may well have been different. There’s your cases right there. There they are. Fundamental cases of constitutional law. That the U.S. Supreme Court ducked. And so this the state appellate court made its decision, people say to me, but, you know, the state Supreme Court, it’s got five dams and two Republicans, you know what they’re going to do? They’ll do whatever they’re going to do and they have to put their names to it. But with any help from God Almighty himself. Let us hope the Supreme Court has enough guts to take it up, let us hope that these justices are serious about. Faithfully executing the law. We shall see. We shall see, and I guarantee you, I don’t know. That the major news organizations in this country, a.k.a. the major propaganda mills in this country, whether The New York Times or The Washington Post, whether Melasti or the Constipated News Network. Whether NBC, ABC, CBS or all the rest of the crap out there, I guarantee you they didn’t lead with this case because it just proves the narrative. It disproves the narrative. So I wanted to be abundantly clear right out of the box, and we will have the lawyer who argued the case in front of the state appellate court and I just want to congratulate him and all the lawyers that actually filed the briefs. Did the research because they were all volunteers, every one of them. And to my great. Frustration, their lawyers out there who have you ever seen appear on TV before, lawyers out there who are fundraising off of this, who had literally nothing to do with that. They may have signed their name to a brief, but they didn’t file any brief and they didn’t make any argument. The people who won this case are unsung heroes whose names you don’t even know. And they went up against the big dogs, they went up against the big Philadelphia law firms and the big Pittsburgh law firms, they went up against a former solicitor of the United States of America. They went up against the DNC and they whipped their asses. And I want to congratulate them. They do not see glory. They do not seek attention. These are citizen lawyers. Were denounced even by our side, poor lawyers, they don’t even know what they’re doing by individuals with big mouths who didn’t know what the hell was taking place. That’s why I said over and over and over and over again, I will continue to say these were the two big cases and had the United States Supreme Court taking up the other big case, all the changes that were made by governors, all the changes that were made by state courts, even federal district courts, all the bureaucratic changes that were made by boards of elections and secretaries of states would have been killed, would have been stopped. At the Supreme Court, done its job in the first place. I’ll be right back.
Hour 1 Segment 2
Seems like every day you wake up or go to bed and some. Attack on police officers where they’ve been shot. I’ve never seen anything like this and nobody else has either. And it’s not by accident or coincidence that this is going on, I’ve been talking about it a lot here, talking about it on TV and radio Levin TV. I notice. Notice all the talk about systemic racism in the police force. You don’t hear about that this week from CNN or MSNBC or the rest of the media, do you? No, no, no, they’re kind of laying low. People lie, things lay kind of laying low. Even worse, they pretend they give a damn, you don’t give a damn. No, this assault on the cops has been going on for far too long now, people think it’s a it’s a free shot, but the hell they been in prison, they get out of prison. Illegal aliens. Who are criminals, they get to come back. Police officers tell me, would you put your life on the line every time you stop a car, you go to a domestic disturbance or something like that, earning what they earn, they earn a pittance. A pittance, nothing compared to what other people learn, nothing. It’s funny, all during the pandemic, the cops were out there, they were working while the teachers wanted to stay home, while many of them still want to stay home. Cops didn’t stay home. There’s public employees and then there’s public employees, there’s public service, and then there’s a joke. Yes, the widow of police officer Jason Rivera, Jason Rivera, he didn’t sound or look white to me, did he, to you, Mr. Producer? There’s an awful lot of African-Americans and Hispanic Americans and Asian-Americans, other people who are police officers in this country, but you wouldn’t know it. You wouldn’t know it. If you listen to the radical left in the media in this country, you wouldn’t know it. Well, his widow. Spoke at his funeral today at St. Patrick’s Cathedral. And the streets were packed with police officers, weren’t they, Mr. Producer? Thousands who had a damn enough of this. Hat tip, Newsmax, cut to go, we are not safe anymore, not even the members of the service. I know you were tired of these laws, especially the ones from. The new D.A., I hope he’s watching you speak through me right now. Officer Rivera was 22. They’d been married three months. I’m sure all of our blue family is tired, too, but I promise, we promise that your death won’t be in vain. I love you to the end of time. We’ll take the watch from here. What a brave. Classy young woman, heartbreaking, absolutely heartbreaking. I’m so sick of these criminals getting away with what they get away with and then when they’re stopped, they’re the victims. I’ll tell you what we can do about this, three strikes and you’re out worked in California. The sentencing guidelines worked in the federal government. We have more people in prisons than any other country, apparently we don’t have enough, and what does that have to do with anything? What does that have to do with anything? Nothing. What does that prove? Well, there’s something wrong with that, it doesn’t prove that at all, proves that we have evil, violent people in an open society that need to be punished. In other countries that don’t have a lot of people in prison, some of them are executed beforehand, some of them are dealt with in other ways, they don’t keep the data properly. But what about Europe? Europe is a crumbling old culture. And some of us don’t want us to follow. Some of us do not want us out of our. This poor woman will be out, will be without her love of her life for the rest of her life. And you look. At Officer Jason Rivera, nice young man, his older brother said today this is what he wanted to do. He was so proud to be a member of the NYPD, so proud. Three cops, like they don’t exist, like they’re inhuman, like like they’re not human. Just just it’s just disgusting. When people need help, of course, cops don’t come, that’s racist, too, apparently. Well, this is the situation, it’s not just New York, it’s Houston, it’s Kansas City, it’s L.A., San Francisco. That’s Philadelphia, it’s Boston. It’s every significant city and even larger cities where deputy sheriffs are being killed, shot at. Ladies and gentlemen, we need to take a stand. We need to support our police. We need to vote these left wing bastards out of office. And yes, we need to make sure that we arm ourselves and our families arm ourselves. So if anyone breaks into our home, we can protect our families. That’s what should be rational and normal.
Hour 1 Segment 3
the media flacking for the January six committee. Any surprise there? Ladies and gentlemen, how about this story? By John Salomon’s Just the news fantastic site, by the way. Liberal mega donor George Soros pumps 125 million dollars into super PAC to help Democrats in 2022 midterms. Soros says money will support causes candidates regardless of political party, but so far recipients all appear to be major Democrat PACs. Of course, it’s not. Regardless of political party, he’s their sugar daddy. He’s the sugar daddy for the American Marxists. His money is everywhere. I don’t know who’s buying off more people and groups and politicians and the communist China or George Soros. It’s amazing how this man’s never investigated, not by Congress, not by. The phony media outlets, not by any grand juries. This man wants to buy this election for the Democrats, he’s putting one hundred and twenty five million dollars. Nobody’s ever done that into a superPAC to help the Democrats in the midterms. You are going to be flooded now with commercials that lie to you. You are going to be flooded now with flyers that are sent to you. You’re going to be overwhelmed with this information. They’re going to use that money, I am sure, to push out their vote. So that’s now two billionaires who are openly pushing their agenda, although in the case of Mark Zuckerberg with his four hundred and seventeen million dollars, he didn’t do it openly. So when you count Zukerberg and Soros, you’re talking about over half a billion dollars by two men. Or radical leftists and surrogates of the Democrat Party laundering this money through PACs, laundering this money through so-called nonprofit organizations, let’s go on, the piece says. Let’s see here, billionaire mega donor George Soros has poured one hundred and twenty five million dollars into a super PAC this election cycle, the money already being distributed to political action committees backing Democratic candidates and causes. Now, Soros has used the super PAC known as Democracy PAC since 2019 to support political campaigns. It says the group’s money will support causes and candidates that I just talked about. But the money so far going to Democrat leaning groups, including 2.5 million to the Senate Majority PAC that Schumer, one million to the House majority PAC that’s Pelosi, one million to the Democrat Association of Secretaries of State. Why? To affect the elections, a group fighting to elect Democrats to the formerly obscure posts that become a well-known and heavily politicized after the 2020 election. They’re talking about secretaries of state. In other positions of that sort, calls his one hundred twenty five million dollars a long term investment, quote unquote, to continue supporting politicians in campaigns past 2020 because he’s 90. There are no anal exams of this guy by the legal analysts out there. No, nothing by the legal analysts out there. It’s true, sources his son, Alexander Soros, will serve as the president of the PAC. He cited the January six capital riot as an example, the ongoing efforts to discredit and undermine our electoral process. We just had a victory in Pennsylvania, and you watch that Pennsylvania Supreme Court, if it undermines that appellate court, that undermines our electoral process. That is an insurrection, one that’s dressed up as a lawyerly judge made insurrection. YORGA He also argues such threats cannot be addressed in just one or two election cycles. You remember when the Black Panthers were threatening people at a voting precinct, Mr. Lewis, remember that several election cycles ago? They stood right outside threatening people, nothing ever happened. Isn’t that amazing? Following its filing with the Federal Elections Commission, Democracy PAC spending will be posted publicly in the coming days. Can’t wait for that, but there’s usually a long delay between that and the spending of the money, usually along delay. But the Democrats never play fair. Talked about it the first hour, talking about Soros, we’ve talked about Zuckerberg gerrymander and gerrymandering, it’s a throwback to slavery, but nobody does gerrymandering better than the Democrats who would know something about slavery, actually. Considering it occurred mostly under them. Over at our friends at Breitbart, D.C., S.C., Democratic campaign, congressional committee endorsed, they like the letters, you know, like USSR. Dixie endorses aggressive gerrymander to leave New York with three Republican seats. Did you see this, Mr. Producer? You live in New York, it’s a lot of people in New York, do you think it would really be representative of the people of New York, including other areas of New York, central New York, north New York, closer to Kennedy, you think would be representative of them to have three Republicans in the whole state in the House of Representatives? Unbelievable. Well, how did you get those illegal aliens voting? Everything will be copasetic. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee wants the New York legislature to approve an aggressive gerrymander that would leave New York with three Republican and 23 Democrat seats in Congress. Now, let me tell you how the Democrats are manipulated in a very nefarious and unconscionable manner. The 1965 Civil Rights Act, the point of the 1965 Civil Rights Act, among other things, is to ensure that congressional districts are drawn in a way as to deny minorities, in particular black people, their representation in Congress. That’s the purpose. In one major section. So what the Democrats do with the so-called civil rights division of the Department of Justice. What they do is any time districts are drawn that might help the Republicans, they go into federal court in the states that are covered and they argue that they are trying to diminish the vote of minorities, particularly black citizens. You don’t see that happening when the Democrats gerrymander, do you? And what the Democrats try to do is they try and put as many minorities in single districts as they possibly can so they can have as many white Democrats in Congress as possible. Did you know that? So from time to time, you’ll see these lawsuits where the Republicans and black organizations are on the same side because the Democrat Party is playing the system. Now, I keep warning we keep talking about 2022 as a blowout. Ladies and gentlemen, it may well be. And I pray to God that it is. But I’m not Nostradamus. I don’t know what’s going to happen. I see the polls. I see the pundits. I even hear some of the Democrats saying we’re going to get blown out. OK, I hope they do. But the Democrats are not rolling over and playing dead. Nobody, nobody. Is more sinister than the people who run that party and their lawyers. And what they are doing with gerrymandering right now is they’re picking off a whole bunch of seats for themselves. Whether these people get elected or not, in other words, they’re making certain that they are setting up these districts so only Democrats can win. If a whole state of New York. You’re going to wind up with three Republicans in Maryland, they have one Republican House seat. They’re trying to eliminate it. They’re trying to eliminate all representation of any Republican in the House of Representatives from the state of Maryland. So anybody who doesn’t live in Montgomery County or Prince George’s County or Baltimore. Really won’t have the representation. These are the population pockets and the Democrats use the population pockets to try and destroy any Republican districts. And this is the game, and since the Republicans go in and they say, no, no, no, we’re not going to do that, we need to redraw the oh, you’re taking a seat or two or three away from minorities. This is what the Democrats do. They are pernicious. They are evil. That I say evil. I mean evil. This is how they play this game. And now they’re going to use a lot of Soroses money to do it. Democracy PAC Whosay Phoolan. Who’s he fallen? In his case, the whole pack should be called fascist pack. Because that’s what they’re promoting over there. In my humble opinion. And I know him, right? We all know we’ll be right back.
Hour 1 Segment 4
There’s been a lot of hubbub today about how babies, but there’s been a lot of hubbub today about this call Biden had with the president of Ukraine, and there should be a lot of hubbub because there is a dispute over what actually took place. And I heard our friend, Kayleigh McEnany. I heard her say, you know, this issue of transcripts that was brought up during Trump, the Democrats in the media, but particularly the Democrats demanded. The transcript from President Trump’s call to the president of Ukraine, which was a perfectly fine call, perfectly fine. The way they twisted it and twisted the wording is disgusting, but that’s what they do, much like they treat the Constitution. But anyway. So people are talking about consistency here that’s released the transcript and I hear some Republicans saying, no, you know, I want to tell you something. If we do not use the opportunity to do to them what they do to us, this will never stop. We need to ram their tactics down their damn throats. Joe Biden must be impeached, and I want Kevin McCarthy to hear me clearly, Steve Scalise. Elise Stefanik, the three leaders of the Republican Party, he has committed impeachable offenses, I’m not talking about a syllable here and there and a transcript. I know what’s going on in the southern border in and of itself. Failing to comply. With existing federal statutes respecting immigration. Is an effort to completely upset the constitutional construct, you do not have the right the power, you do not have it as president. To only enforce laws you agree with. And when we reach that point, it’s over. And we have got to fight these tripwires, we’ve got to do it. And so I am telling you that this issue and there are other issues. Need to be used now if the Republicans are too scared to bring it up during the course of the election, don’t make their own decision. But I want to make it clear if they take the house. There’s not going to be any patience. For them to use the base the way Boehner sought to use the base, the way Paul Ryan sought to use the base of the way any of these other phony speakers tried to use the base. We have individuals in the other party who are destroying our country. And we cannot have. Marcus of Queensbury rules on one side and you have rules on the other. No. This man has committed an impeachable offense, if not impeachable offenses, and there ought to be discussion about the 25th Amendment because the 25th Amendment was actually adopted for cases like this. Where a man in the Oval Office or a woman or somebody transitioning or whatever, that how that person has lost more than a few marbles, who is running this executive branch? Who’s running the Biden administration? And the point of it anyway, based on the 25th Amendment, is to get to the bottom of that, not why you got to wait for this to trigger that, to trigger another house can look into it. They can’t trigger it themselves, but there’s a reason they can look into it. But impeachment is actually easier than the 25th Amendment. There’s no two thirds vote requirement in the House. Her conviction, of course, I’m talking about to open an investigation, they should put Jim Jordan at the top of that Judiciary Committee and start rolling. Now, maybe put. But one of the more solid individuals who really believe in the Constitution and the rule of law, they had a homeland security where all the activities going on or lack thereof. This cannot stand. He’s negotiating with the Iranian regime, the Islama not the regime in Tehran in secret Congress, at least the Republicans don’t have the foggiest idea what’s going on. On a matter of life and death. That bastard regime is trying to get ICBMs with nuclear warheads. What’s that all about, and they ought to open a full scale investigation. Not on Hunter, Biden, not on Frank, Biden, on Joe Biden. Who’s in the Oval Office? On Joe Biden. To determine the extent to which he’s been bought off. By the Chinese regime or any other regime? Joe Biden was always a political thug, nasty, rotten, the way he treated other people. Who didn’t deserve it bauk. Thomas, others who didn’t deserve it. We’ve had enough of sitting on our hands and watching this stuff, enough already. They’re still chasing Donald Trump at Mar a Lago, still still going after his taxes, still going after his kids, trying to pin January six on the president of the United States at the time when he’s the one that offered up the National Guard. Meanwhile, there Helen Keller, when it comes to Nancy Pelosi, will, of course. That’s what news anchors Today, Tonight, tomorrow should be asking Jim Jordan and others, how is it that she gets away with this? Nancy Pelosi, I want to say. Brett Baird did ask Liz Cheney that question, by the way, when she was on his show, by the way, Liz, we always have an open time for you to come on the program. He used to come on all the time when you were running for office and so forth. We’d love to have you back at Liz.