On Wednesday’s Mark Levin Show, do you really think America is as bad as the Democrats and President Biden say it is? Do you really believe that their defense of voting rights is genuine when they altered our electoral system via lawsuits and gubernatorial executive orders for mail-in voting to help Biden and their fellow Democrats win in 2020? Yet it’s the Democrats who embrace members like Jaime Raskin, whose father was a revolutionary founded the Institute for Policy Studies, an anti-American communist front group. Then, Democrats challenged the 2000 and 2004 elections and many claimed that George W. Bush and Donald Trump were not their presidents. They claimed that there was ballot fraud and irregularities with voting machines, yet the media did not censor them, kick them off social media, or claim they were attacking democracy. Democrats also fought for the filibuster saying it would be a doomsday for democracy if the rule were changed. Later, Inflation is at its highest rate in nearly 40 years ago when Jimmy Carter was President back in 1982. The government can’t take enough of your money to cover its exorbitant expenses. So they tried to change the calculations for the Consumer Price Index (CPI) while attempting to exclude the costs of food and energy from the figure. Afterward, Glenn Beck joins the show to discuss his bout with COVID and his new book, “The Great Reset: Joe Biden and the Rise of Twenty-First-Century Fascism.” Beck added that the end of 20th century progressivism has arrived and now it’s time for the left to carry their new mantra for the “great re-set” which he described as a Marxist road to serfdom.
THIS IS FROM:
Just The News
Dems’ bid to tar 2020 election skeptics belied by left’s own history of contesting voting results
CNBC
Inflation rises 7% over the past year, highest since 1982
Just The News
Biden administration shuts down energy leases without consulting Alaskans, lawmakers allege
Zero Hedge
No Surprise Here: Americans Are Reading The Fewest Books Per Year On Record
Washington Free Beacon
Virginia-Based Voter Suppression Group Paid Thousands to Voting Rights ‘Champion’ Marc Elias
The podcast for this show can be streamed or downloaded from the Audio Rewind page.
Image used with permission of Getty Images / Anadolu Agency
Rough transcript of Hour 1
Hour 1 Segment 1
Do you think America is as awful as the Democrats say, day in and day out? That our voting system, the greatest republic with the greatest voting system ever devised by man, is the worst on the face of the Earth. You think it’s discriminatory? You think people who want to vote can’t vote. Do you think this nation. Which is majority Caucasian. Is systemically racist. The evidence for this. Do you think this nation is anything like the Democrats, the media and the American Marxists describe it as anything like it? Of course, Joe Biden yesterday unhinged. Yelling at the top of his lungs. Going on and on about how America is Jim Crow to. How people are prevented from voting, how there is systemic suppression going on, targeted, particularly minorities. Does anybody? Other than the propagandists, does anybody in this country who actually lives here and works here? And raises their kids here actually believe any of this. Call me a square, if you will, but I remember the days when our presidents would talk up the country. When they were proud of the country. When they would go overseas and not trash our country, but promote it. I remember the day when. When the old Soviet Union and communist China and the rest of them were lectured about our voting system, how magnificent it was. Those days apparently are gone. Now, you say, what about Trump criticizing what takes place? Well, this is the. The unbelievable hypocrisy and irony of the media, the Democrat Party and so forth, they intentionally spent hundreds of millions of dollars on litigation. They went to their Democratic governors, their Democrat secretaries of state, they brought cases in front of their Democrat elected judges in the various states, including Supreme Court justices in Pennsylvania and so forth, in order to alter our electoral system. To help Joe Biden and the Democrats, this there is no dispute. They bragged about it. The lawsuits were filed. The decisions were made. Executive orders were issued by governors, by by secretaries of state, regulations were instituted. There’s no debate about this, and it’s the one area, the meeting, the Democrats and the rest. Now, Michael Rounds, who will not come on the program, the Mitt Romney’s and the others will not discuss. Because it’s all too obvious. It’s all too obvious. And they are endlessly trashing this country and if you dare. To raise your voice or protest or even talk about what they’re doing, you are said to be undermining the nation. Do we honestly believe. That our police departments are filled with individuals of all races, of all backgrounds, of all politics. Who go out of the way to look for minorities to murder. Do we honestly believe. That day to day, white people are out to get black people. Now, this is absurd. Our borders are wide open and people are rushing into the country, not from Europe. From Africa, from Southeast Asia, from the Middle East. And obviously Central and South America. Imagine leaving their countries, leaving their homes, leaving their culture to come into the United States. Well, what does that tell you? What does that tell you about their countries and culture? And what does it tell you about our country and culture? The superiority is determined by people themselves with their own feet. With their own feet, they make the decisions. Has Joe Biden said anything positive about this country in the last 12 months or even since he’s been campaigning for president, has he ever said anything positive about this country? As Nancy Pelosi has Chuck Schumer. Have the media. No. No. And this American Marxist movement is a wrecking ball. They’re destroying our public schools, they’re called public schools, they’re run by the government, you and I, we pay for everything. The employees. Are destroying the school system, the teachers unions and so forth. Their professors, their tenured professors, the laziest bunch of people ever meet their tenured professors. Destroying the very institutions that that pay them. Look at the members of Congress in the Democrat Party side, I’ve talked about this guy Raschein before. He’s from Maryland. He represents a very, very liberal county called Montgomery County and some other areas that Montgomery County is overwhelmingly white and Democrat and left. He has served on the impeachment committees, he serves on the January six committee. Why is he picked? His father co-founded an organization called the Institute for Policy Studies. The Institute for Policy Studies was founded as a rabid anti-American anti constitution organization. An organization that promoted North Korea, an organization that promoted at the time East Germany, an organization that promoted Cuba, communist China, the old Soviet Union, that’s what it did. It was a hate America anti-American organization, the Institute for Policy Studies. And his father. Was one of the revolutionaries who founded it and promoted it. And of course, he would become a tenured professor in the area to. Started out working on Capitol Hill for radical leftist like Casten Meyer out of Wisconsin. McGeorge Bundy for a while under the Kennedy administration, but after a while they didn’t get along so. He broke off from him, formed his own group with others. You can Google all this now his son gets elected to the state Senate in Maryland and our son’s a congressman. His son is every bit as radical and rogue as his father. These aren’t your. Typical, quote, unquote, liberal Democrats. These are radical, burned down the system, Democrats. His father was close to the new left. Defended Students for Democratic Action. Why is he on these committees? Because of his pedigree. Because of who he is, because that’s what the Democrat Party has become, even Joe Biden has figured that out. That’s why he’s lurched so far to the left. That is now his party. His party is. Akin to an extremely radical extremist left wing neo Marxist European party, that’s what the Democrat Party is today. They have 50 votes in the Senate, that’s all, but Kamala Harris, under our Constitution, is the president in the Senate being vice president can break a tie, 50 votes in the Senate. So they should be able to change our voting system for all time. How you vote? In your community, they should be able to change that to advantage the Democrat Party, their radical agenda, and grab power and centralize it in violation of the federal Constitution. I didn’t hear Senator Mike Rounds talk about that. I haven’t heard. A king zinger, talk about that or Cheney talk about that or the usual reprobates. I want to dig into this a little bit further, you have Adam Schiff. Who’s not only on these impeachment committees, he leads the Intel Committee for impeachment, and then he’s on the January 6th committee, a man who lies to the American people. A man who takes information. And changes it. Changes it during the course of an investigation and a public official hearing. That man shouldn’t have a law degree, his license should be taken from him. He’s a sleazeball, he’s an ambulance chaser for the Democrat Party. He should be removed from Congress, but why is he promoted? Eric Swalwell slept with the enemy. Literally, he slept with a communist Chinese hooker slash spy. What information did they get from him? Has there been a congressional investigation, an ethics investigation? What did Swalwell tell them? He sits on key committees, and yet it’s interesting, he’s a main agitator against Donald Trump and against the Republicans, like he’s doing the work of the communist Chinese. Bennie Thompson. A Mississippi. Was a radical. A radical anti cop activist for years. Anti cop activists for years, he’s now chairman of this committee, claims to be defending the security of the building and defending the Capitol Police. And I could go further. Who’s Nancy Pelosi? Nancy Pelosi was a staffer to Phil Burton. As red as they come in California, an extremist, a radical who represented the area of San Francisco, his brother, the same thing, he headed the Democrat Party for a period of time. He took Pelosi under his wing and as he moved up the ladder, he brought her up the ladder with him. And that’s what she represents. It doesn’t matter that her husband is taken advantage of every public position she’s been in, that they become worth several hundred millions of dollars. They’ve they’ve actually produced not a damn thing, but have used politics to their advantage. Media have never really looked into her background or really looked into her big dummy husband’s background, Paul. They don’t ask for her tax returns or anything of the sort. No. As she pushes the country into the toilet with her friend George Soros. Who they don’t do stories on either. You’d think they would, a multibillionaire. A multibillionaire with a seedy past and a seedy current. His influence on elections, some billionaires are OK, apparently. And some aren’t. More when I return
Hour 1 Segment 2
Just a few years back, the Democrats oppose changing the filibuster. Eliminating the so-called nuclear option. In fact, Harry Reid helped destroy the Senate, began the process in many respects, but including using the filibuster to block circuit court nominees that George W. Bush had had proposed never before in American history had a party used the filibuster the way the Democrats had used to stop one nominee after another. Part of that had been used or at least threatened ones with respect to a Supreme Court nominee in the early 60s. But this was unleashed to stop George W. Bush, who they called an illegitimate president. As a result, the election of 2000 and there we’re not going to allow an illegitimate president, their words, to make permanent changes to the judiciary. And so they instituted the filibuster against circuit court nominees. The media was very, very thrilled about it when the Republicans took over. They said, OK, we’re going to institute instituted against the Supreme Court nominees, Barack Obama. And of course, the Democrats squealed as if they had no role in triggering this entire process. The Democrats a few years back said, but we must never abandon the filibuster when it comes to legislation. Because then the Senate will be nothing more than the House and we don’t need two houses because there will be a parliament. Schumer made the argument little Dick Durbin and other leaders of the Democrat Party, including Joe Biden. Now they have a 50/50 vote advantage, a 50 50 vote advantage in the Senate simply because the Constitution gives the vice president the position of Senate president, should she exercise it, and in this case, she would 51 to 50. So now they want to use the filibuster eliminated so that they can get their voting system through their voting system through which they call voting rights and voting reform. I want to continue with this when I return.
Hour 1 Segment 3
The Democrat Party and these disparate Norrick and Marxist movements that have pulled together. They have some kind of an aggregate force now in which they drive the agenda, what they drive is a theoretical, ideological. Agenda. Which defies common sense, which defies logic and rationality, which defies human experience. And they don’t care. Anything to get and keep and expand power, it’s like economics. Everybody knows that when you continue to massively deficit spending, you build a debt up, that’s just. Really unbelievably big, unimaginably big that you’re going to damage the value of the currency, which is simply paper. You are going to create inflation. You’re going to have too much money chasing too few goods. You’re going to have empty shelves at the grocery store. Gasoline prices are going to go up. Food prices are going to go up, all prices are going to go up, and yet the value of your income, whether you’re on a fixed income and a pension and Social Security, a union contract or otherwise, will not be able to keep up. But they do it anyway. And then they blame the private sector. While they’re destroying the currency and creating inflation, the private sector cannot destroy the currency and create inflation. These industries, they don’t all sit together one after another and try and figure out how to screw the consumer, the consumer is their God little guy. The consumer is their God. Without the consumer, they cannot survive. But government. Doesn’t need the people to survive. Once it controls the people. Once it brainwashes the people, once it passes laws to compel the people to do what they want them to do, and this whole virus situation is demonstrated that. I want you to listen to this. This is the Democrats in 2000 and 2004 objecting to the electoral counting of George W. Bush as president. It’s amazing how silent George W. Bush is, except when it comes to attacking Donald Trump. Same with the Cheney’s. And it wasn’t just in 2000 and 2004, they, of course, tried to destroy Donald Trump’s candidacy and Donald Trump’s presidency in 2016 and beyond. We all know it. It was like a feeding frenzy, we’d never seen anything like this in American history. And here we are. One year out from the Trump presidency, and they’re still investigating. And they’re still attacking. Not Biden. Not when he’s done and doing to the country. Not what he’s done and doing to other countries. Afghanistan, we have citizens in Afghanistan, and you will not see this reported in the news, it’s over. And allies to. Here’s just a little bit, two minutes of the Democrats. 2000, 2004, on the floor of the House, as the House members and the Senate members meet to count the Electoral College votes. But they called the 2000 election illegitimate because the Supreme Court appointed George Bush, you see. And 2004 was illegitimate because they focused on Ohio and we had ballot issues and machine issues in Ohio, you see. Hat tip, just the news cut one go the chair now hands to the tellers the certificate of the electors for president and vice president of the state of Florida. Mr. President, the objection is in writing, signed by a number of members of the House of Representatives, but not by a member of the Senate. Mr. President, I stand for the purpose of objecting to the counting of the vote on the state of Florida as read. Mr. President, arrive on rise on behalf of the Congressional Black Caucus to object to the 25 electoral votes from Florida and its president. Thank you for your inquiry. It is in writing. It is signed by myself on behalf of my diverse constituents and the millions of Americans who have been disenfranchised by Florida’s inaccurate vote count. The is the objection signed by Senator. What? Mr. Chairman. Mr President, I am objecting to work to the idea that votes in Florida were not counted. The clerk will report the objection. We, a member of the House of Representatives and the United States senator, object to the counting of the electoral votes of the state of Ohio on the grounds that they were not under all of the known circumstances regularly given signed Stephanie Tubbs Jones state of Ohio, Barbara Boxer, state of California. The objection today is raised because there are irregularities across this country with regard to voting, and we as a Congress have an obligation to step up to the plate and correct them. Mr. Speaker and members, I dedicate my objection to Ohio’s electoral votes to Mr. Michael Moore, the producer of the documentary 9/11 of All. We are here because not a single election official in Ohio has given us any explanation for the massive and widespread irregularities in the state. No explanation for the machines in Mahoning County that recorded Kerry votes for Bush. Our people are dying all over the world. A Alaska, my state, for what reason, to bring democracy to the far corners of the world. Let’s fix it here and let’s do it first thing else. Hmm. Do you remember? Do you remember the media? Calling an anniversary. For the attack on our democratic system, but markets different. It’s different there wasn’t violence on the capital that day. Ladies and gentlemen, tyranny has many faces just because people wear ties and jackets or pretty dresses, just because they have closely groomed hair and perfume and cologne, just because they have nice shoes and and nice jewelry and so forth, and they walk in the halls of Congress. Does it make them any better than anybody else? These members of Congress today who seek to destroy our system are just as dangerous, if not more dangerous, than the rioters in the summer of 20-20. Just as dangerous, what they’re trying to do to our country by subverting the rule of law in the Constitution. With propaganda instead of news reporting. The reason they hate Trump. Is because Trump stood in their way, he took on their media. He took on their politicians. He took on their judges. He took on their corporatists. He took on their colleges and universities. He took on the critical race theory ideology. And more. He not only had to be removed. They felt and they tried, but anyone and anything that supported him, whether family or staff or whether you, the voters. You must be disparaged. Your speech must be shut down, your opinions must be divided, you must be compared to neo-Nazis and the Klan. Even though that’s the other party. There cannot be free speech or academic freedom in the halls of education. There cannot be parental speech and taxpayer speech at school board meetings. It must be squelched, there cannot be debate over government decisions that expand the power and the role of government. Big tech will ensure that. Takes place. Then we have. The filibuster. Joe Biden and Cory Booker and Elizabeth Warren. Chris Coons, Bernie Sanders, Angus King, named after a cow, Chuck Schumer. Dick Durbin and so forth. All Democrats montage from 2005 to 2020 one. Cut to go, ending the filibuster is a very dangerous thing to do because it’s been used by progressives as a whole our whole time to make sure that we did not get rolled over. The filibuster is a decision that’s made in the Senate. My colleagues and I, I’ve everybody I’ve talked to believe that the legislative filibuster should stay there and I will personally resist efforts to get rid of them, understands the profound and changing impact that it would have on the functioning of the United States Senate to make us just like the House to get rid of the one most important rule that requires compromise, requires working across the aisle to get anything significant done. If the nominee can’t get 60 votes, you don’t change the rule, you change the nominee. And we should make no mistake, this nuclear option is ultimately an example of the arrogance of power. It is a fundamental power grab by the majority party. I’ve said during my rehiring process last year, I said it would take an awful, awful lot for me to end the filibuster. I don’t think we ought to be coming in willy nilly and and changing the rules. No, I’m not crazy about getting rid of the filibuster. And so if you’re not able to get 60 votes on something, it just means you have worked hard enough talking to enough people and trying to listen to their concerns and then coming up with a solution that they can support. The filibuster in the rules of the Senate in many ways are designed to protect the interests of small states. So I’m not one who thinks it should be abolished altogether. We need to say to the Republicans, you can’t change the rules in the middle of the game. It’ll be a doomsday for democracy if we do, but not any longer. Now it’s a doomsday for democracy if we don’t. At this point, you should despise these people. You should be offended by these people. It should be so thoroughly and abundantly clear what they’re about. That these people are going to destroy this country and our governing system. They’re going to destroy our Constitution and our economic system. And they will do anything, anything. I’ll be right back.
Hour 1 Segment 4
And we don’t have enough time to tally, but I will spend part of the next hour, Chuck Schumer, Chuck Schumer, bragging about how they’ve successfully smeared Donald Trump. How they successfully smeared Donald Trump, Chuck Schumer using Ronald Reagan’s name. To advance his agenda, having worked in Reagan’s campaigns in his administration, I can promise you he would want nothing to do with Chuck Schumer. Nothing. And going on about voter suppression, how it’s an epidemic in our country, just the most outrageous things. The most outrageous things just flat out lies, and the Democrats are doing this more and more their propaganda, Hakeem Jeffries, who wants to be the next speaker of the House and other radical. Talking about how people are being denied their votes, don’t you think if this was going on in such a massive, systemic way, that we’d have reports day in and day out, so many reports we couldn’t keep track of them in the news platforms of all the people who were denied the right to vote, who should have been able to vote? Aren’t you amazed at how little actual coverage there is? Oh, and it’s so difficult to vote. It’s so difficult to vote, you know, you got to go to the polling place under a hail of fire. You know, the jellybean test in our inner cities. You know, if you’re a woman, you’re specifically prohibited and if you’re a young person. They try to make sure that you don’t get to the polls either. Oh, yes, it’s so systemic. It’s all over the place, they say, out of one side of their mouth and out of the other side of their mouth, they say, what? Why does Donald Trump keep challenging us? Everybody knows it was a fair election. Everybody knows was a lawful election. There were six billion lawsuits brought. Everybody knows that our system works. It’s Donald Trump. He’s the problem. Don’t you see? They lie. They’re hypocrites. They contradict, but it doesn’t seem to matter. I’ll be right back.