March 11th, 2024

On Monday’s Mark Levin Show, Hamas is a monstrous terrorist group funded by Iran and Qatar, among others, and is murdering hostages. They lie about everything, including casualties in Gaza. Yet, Biden, his regime and media surrogates, and jew-haters everywhere continue to use their lies about casualties as a weapon against Israel. Biden used them at the State of the Union, he used them when standing next to the genocidal dictator of Jordan, and the media followed along, but it’s a lie. A statistician called out these fake numbers in his article, ‘How the Gaza Ministry of Health Fakes Casualty Numbers.’ The White House is literally trying to rally America against Israel with lies about casualties. Also, Liz Cheney and the January 6 Committee suppressed evidence that Trump did push for the National Guard. We have a right to know if Liz Cheney and others are involved in a cover-up. They all need to be investigated. Rep Barry Loudermilk calls in to explain that Trump “did in fact offer 10,000 National Guard troops to secure the U.S. Capitol, which was turned down.” Later, TikTok is claiming their free speech is being threatened as Congress could bring up legislation to remove TikTok from China’s control. It’s not free speech when an enemy state which has all but declared war on the U.S., is brainwashing our kids and grabbing their data.

Photo by THOMAS COEX/AFP

The podcast for this show can be streamed or downloaded from the Audio Rewind page.

Rough transcription of Hour 1

Segment 1
Hello, America. Mark Levin here. Our number 877-381-3811. 877-381-3811. I hope you’re well. When he used two examples of monumental lies how the media promote them. And it has a horrendous effect on our country. On the truth. Just to. And there’s 1002. I have a list here from Mr. Producer of clips from Kamala Harris. Joe Biden. Bernie Sanders. Let’s see some others. Here we have Raphael Warnock. You know, the usual commie bastards. And they keep talking about the slaughter of the. Cousins, citizens. Many of them keep using that number of 30,000 or 27,000. No longer do they even say where they got it from, nor do the media. Now keep something in mind. The media invite these people on as guests. So they want Bernie Sanders on Face the Nation, even though he’s inconsequential. They want Raphael Warnock on Meet the Press. These are the most radical elements in our society. They want them to say what they keep saying. I had the misfortune, serious misfortune. I was flying today, and I’m on JetBlue, which is a great airline. I’m not talking about them. The lady next to me was watching CNN, Mr. Producer. Now, of course, my screen wasn’t working. You ever have that? My screens are worried, so I’m sitting there like a bump on a log because I would have put Fox or something on or ESPN or whatever. And she’s watching this now. She’s reading a book while this on the screen. So I’m watching it. And it’s on. And I’m reading what’s being said in the. In the titles that they’re putting in. I dare you to watch CNN for 2 hours in the morning. And MSNBC’s even worse. It is non stop. Propaganda and lies. And so the media invited. SANDERS You know, these reprobates. WARNOCK The others on keep talking about the statistics, the death of the Gazans, and this is the hook now they want to use to ensure that Israel is defeated, that its people are constantly attacked because this is their base, the Democrat Party. They’re all out of the closet now. Israel’s attacked viciously. Now all the anti-Semites, including the Democrats, including Biden, they’re all out of the closet. There’s a great piece written. We’re gentlemen says. Yes, Biden only supports Israel when Israel kowtowed to Biden. He never supports Israel when it has a strong prime minister. He only supports Israel when Israel does what he tells them to do or his party tells them what to do. Obama tells them what to do and so forth. And I thought, that’s 100% right. But I want to go on here. We have Sanders, who is a horrendous because he hates America, too, you know, horrendous as so be. And he wants to cut off all aid to Israel unless Netanyahu is toppled. Listen to this punk. Then accuse us of colonialism and imperialism. Mr. Blair’s. Trying to conduct coups of leaders we don’t like who are duly elected. Those are communist leaders, of course, said he, like Senator Bernie Sanders, is an imperialist and a colonialist, and he’s not alone. They all are on the left. And he keep telling. The Israeli government what it must do. And yet it’s amazing. Even many significant leftists in Israel are saying there is no way the people of is are going to accept a two state solution, period. They’re united in this. They have a few oddballs and the oddballs get all the attention in the American media. But I want to go on and prove something to you. There was a statistician. A statistician who took a look at what Hamas has been putting out. Statistician. His name is Abraham Weiner. Why NPR? And he said, top statistician. He’s a professor of statistics and data science, for God’s sakes, at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and faculty co-director of the Wharton Sports Analytics and Business Initiative. Sounds like a pretty important dude, doesn’t Mr. Producer? Like one of the smartest nerds around? So he writes this piece five days ago. It’s available. To the Democrats. It’s available to their media. It’s available. And they ignore. As they must. Bernie Sanders ignores it. Warnock ignores it. Jake TAPPER ignores what BLITZER ignores in. Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer. He ignores it. They all ignore it as they must. Now I can’t redo the whole thing. We will post it. But he says the number of civilian casualties in Gaza. Has been at the center of international attention since the start of the war. The main source for the data has been the Hamas controlled Gaza Health Ministry, which now claims more than 30,000 dead, the majority of which it says are children and women. That’s exactly what Biden said during a state of confusion speech. Here’s the problem with this data. He writes The numbers are not real. That much is obvious to anyone who understands how naturally occurring numbers work. The casualties are not overwhelmingly women, women and children, and the majority may be Hamas fighters. If Hamas numbers are fake or fraudulent in some way, there may be evidence in the numbers themselves that can actually demonstrate it while there’s not much data available. There is a little and it’s enough. From October 26 until November ten, 2023, the Guards Health Ministry released daily casualty figures that include both a total number and a specific number of women and children. The first place to look is the reported total number of deaths, and he has a graph. He says the graph of total deaths by date is increasing with almost metronomic linearity as the graph shows. In other words, it seems like it goes up each day, each day, more and more with precision. The same number of men. The same number of children. The same number of women. He says, Wait a minute, that’s a red flag, number one. He says, Surely this regularity is almost not real. One would expect quite a bit of variation day to day. In fact, the daily reported casualty count of this period averages 270 plus or minus about 15%. That’s strikingly little variation. There should be days where twice the average or more and others with half or less. Perhaps what is happening is the Gaza ministry is releasing fake daily numbers that vary too little because they do not have a clear understanding the behavior of naturally occurring numbers. Yeah, I would guess that’s part of the problem. He says unfortunately, verify control data is not available to formally test this conclusion, but the details of the daily counts render the numbers suspicious. Also, we should see variation in the number of child casualties. That tracks the variation, the number of women. This is because the daily variation in death counts is caused by the variation in the number of strikes on residential buildings and tunnels, which should result in considerable variability in the totals, but less variation in the percentage of deaths across groups, in other words. Obviously, if you’re hitting more buildings, more people will die. If you’re focused on tunnels, less women and children will die, more terrorists will die, he says. But that’s not shown in the numbers. Period. It’s always mostly women, mostly children, as if the Israelis are going through and just bombing apartment buildings one after another, after another after another, and not dealing with tunnels. Now we know that’s a lie. Let’s see here. He says similarly, I pointed that out. This lack of correlation is the second circumstantial piece of evidence suggesting the numbers are not real. But there’s more. The daily number of women casualties should be highly correlated with the number of non women and children that is men reported. Again, this is expected because of the nature of battle, the ebbs and flows. What he’s saying there is, look, you’re saying all these women are dying, all these children are dying. But there aren’t days when more men are dying than women. Mr. British. How is that possible? And why is it the same 70% every time are women and children every single day. Virtually the exact same percentage of women and children are dying as opposed to men. Says that’s not comprehend, that’s incomprehensible. He says, consider further anomalies in the data. First, the death count, reported on October 29, contradicts the numbers reported the day before on the 28th, insofar as they imply that 26 men came back to life. This can happen because of misattribution or just bad reporting. There are a few other days where the numbers of men are reported to be near zero. If these were just reporting errors, then on those days where the death count for a man appears to be in error, the woman’s count should be typical. At least what he’s saying is they’re playing with the numbers. So when they’re putting near zero for men, they’re jacking up the number for women. See what I’m saying, Mr. Producer? Because they need to have a certain number of quote unquote, people dying every day and it increasing quote unquote, people number dying every day. So when they have men nearly at zero, they have to jack up the number of women and children. He’s saying that’s that’s obvious from these numbers. Most likely, the Hamas ministry set on on a daily total arbitrarily. We know this because the daily totals increase to consistently to be real. Then they assigned about 70% of their total to women and children, splitting that amount randomly from day to day. Then they infilled the number of men as set by the predetermined total. Okay, now we have to say this number of men died. This explains all the data we’ve observed. There are other obvious red flags. The Gaza Health Ministry has consistently claimed that 70% of the casualties are women or children. This total is far higher than the numbers reported in earlier conflicts with Israel. Another red flag raised by Sally Eisenberg and written about extensively is that if 70% of the casualties are women and children and 25% of the population is adult male, then either Israel is not successfully eliminating Hamas fighters or adult male. Casualty counts are extremely low. This by itself strongly suggests the numbers are at a minimum grossly inaccurate and quite probably faked. Finally, on February 15, Hamas admitted to losing 6000 of its fighters, which represents more than 20% of the total number of casualties reported. So taken together, Hamas is reporting not only that 70% of the casualties are women and children, but also that 20% are fighters. So he’s saying 20% are terrorists, 70% are women and children. 10% are other men. He said, That’s impossible. That’s impossible. Not only do official Palestinian death counts fail to differentiate soldiers from children in their own official numbers. But Hamas also blames all deaths on Israel, even if caused by Hamas’s own misfired rockets, accidental explosions, deliberate killings or internal battles. So he says the truth can’t yet be known and probably never will be. The total civilian casualty count is likely to be extremely overstated. Israel estimates that at least 12,000 fighters have been killed. If that number proves to be even remotely accurate, then the ratio of non-combatant casualties combatants is remarkably low at most 1.4 to 1 and perhaps as low to 1 to 1. And by historical standards of urban warfare, we can. Battens are embedded above and below into civilian population centers. This is a remarkable and successful effort to prevent unnecessary loss of life while fighting an implacable enemy that protects itself with its own civilian. So what’s the takeaway here? He’s a top statistician in the United States of America at the Wharton School. Is a senior position at the Wharton School. This is what he does every day. He looks at the numbers. He says, this is a lie for these five, six, seven, eight reasons. This was published five days ago. It’s received no attention on any cable channel. It’s received no attention on any network. It’s received no attention in The New York Times of The Washington Post. Over the White House, they continue to lie. So we’re getting lies over and over and over again because it doesn’t fit the narrative. It doesn’t fit the scenario that they’re trying to project on a Netanyahu and his government and the Israeli people. They’re trying literally the White House, the Democrat Party and the media literally to rally our nation against the state of Israel with flat out lies about casualties. You can check it yourself. The Gaza Ministry of Health faked casualty numbers. It’s by tablet. We’ll have it on our Mark Levin Show website immediately following the program. Like we do all articles. Just imagine this and all weekend long. All weekend long. All the major media outlets lied. All the senators lied. All the congressmen lied. Biden lied, Harris by lie. They all lied because they want Israel to lose. I’ll be right back.

Segment 2
Despite all the media support, it’s static as they act like a returning guard to protect another great hero’s, Disney, Lizzie Chaney. It is about damn time. The Republicans on the Oversight Committee, the subcommittee headed by Mr. Loudermilk. And he’s a good man. Call her and others to testify under oath. But information they’re finding out about things they’re saying to the public and put in the report that contradicts interviews that I held right here on the radio. And I think they’re playing games. Does he Lizzie and that former committee semantics. And so you would expect the clowns over at mediate and the prepubescent to champion Oh look at this we got a winner while. Freak show. But we’re going to dig into this a little bit. Ladies and gentlemen, Dizzy Lizzy has a lot to answer for. So do the other reprobates on that, former Nancy Pelosi Stalinist committee. Because it is they who are threatening democracy. They who are threatening America. We’ll be right back.

Segment 3
Liz Cheney is an individual who does not believe in America. She does not believe in separation of powers. She does not believe in the truth. She does not believe in honest hearings. She does not believe people should follow their oath. In my opinion. I believe she needs to be investigated along with other individuals who served on that committee. We already know enormous amounts of information was destroyed. What did she know and when did she know it? If anything. And she’s contradicting now information found by the current subcommittee chairman, and she’s contradicting something that was said on this program by a former secretary of defense. And I think what she’s doing and what that committee did is twist words. Donald Trump never ordered U.S. the National Guard to be prepared. Well, that’s not how it works. He offered the National Guard. He didn’t order them to do anything. But it doesn’t matter. We know how corrupt this committee is, and we know how Liz Cheney is unhinged, obsessed, a new best friend of the same media that tried to destroy her family and her father. Perverse. But it is what it is. Grifting has no morals. And I will not accept her as some kind of heroine. She’s a disgrace. And as I said, it is she. Who’s the threat? To our system of government. It is she and others who are sabotaging the ability of Donald Trump to get re-elected. And by the way, I don’t agree with Donald Trump on everything. I don’t agree with anybody on everything. So what? I didn’t agree with Reagan on everything. But that’s a far cry from what Biden is doing to our country and other countries. And I’m not going to sit here. And give cover to somebody who is personally a reprobate, in my view, who serves the purpose of these pukes in the media, who hate our country. She and others. So what am I talking about? Several reports NBC News, a House committee investigating the special six committee released a sweeping report today that Republicans say demonstrates key witness Cassidy Hutchison’s dramatic account of former President Donald Trump’s actions that day was not corroborated by four other White House employees. Quote. From Chairman Loudermilk. And none of the White House employees corroborated Hutchison’s sensational story about President Trump lunging for the steering wheel of the beast. However, some witnesses did describe the president’s mood after the speech at the Ellipse states. The 81 page report by the House Administration Committee Oversight Subcommittee, led by Louderback Hutcheson, testified under oath, privately and publicly before the January six panel that she had heard that Trump had lunged at the steering wheel of the presidential SUV and got into a physical altercation with his lead Secret Service agent. After the president was told he could not go to the Capitol to join his supporters after speaking at the rally on the Ellipse. That everybody knew that was ridiculous except dizzy. Since taking back the majority last year, House Republicans have been eager. This is NBC. Of course, they can’t write a straight story, but we’ll take what we can get to relitigate the investigation and findings at January six. She was the star witness for the select committee that investigated Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election. And of course, Desi Lizhi took her under her wing. Hutchison has also written about these events in her book. As for Karma Money, Hutchison’s attorney, why do you need an attorney to talk about this? Why do you need an attorney? Can’t you just tell the truth? William H. Jordan referred NBC News to a January letter he sent to Loudermilk stating that his client has been truthful. Your letter means crap, pal, and you know it damn well. Your client needs to testify again under oath before the committee. She needs to be confronted with the contradictions she knew to be confronted with the testimony of other individuals, as does Liz Cheney. Here’s Fox News. The January six congressional committee allegedly falsely claimed it did not have evidence that showed former President Trump this is another issue had requested National Guard assistance, according to a report detailing, quote, a hidden transcript, unquote, that was recently released. Like I say, they’ve destroyed information, tons and tons of information. Why? You know why it’s called a cover up? And we have a right to know if Liz Cheney was involved in a cover up. We have a right to know. Taxpayer dollars, official duties. Now she’s out grifting. We have a right to know if Liz Cheney and others were and are involved in a cover up. No accusation. Let’s just get to the bottom of it. The former J. Six Select Committee. Apparently withheld the testimony of Mr. Murata. Arne Otto, I should say. Mr. Barnardos testimony proves, says Mr. Loudermilk, that Mr. Meadows has said all along. President Trump didn’t did in fact, offer 10,000 National Guard troops to secure the U.S. Capitol, which was turned down. You know, this this Mark Meadows comes under a lot of attack. I will say this about the man. He’s truthful is a man of deep faith. Why would he lie about this? Loudermilk released a transcript of former White House deputy Chief of Staff Anthony Granados interview with the Congressional committee investigating January six on Friday, following The Federalist. Mollie Hemingway, also a Fox News contributor, reporting quote from Representative Liz Cheney. January six Committee suppressed evidence that the Trump administration pushed for 10,000 National Guard members to be on the streets. Granados interview was conducted in January 2022 and attended by Dizzy Lizzy, among other members on the committee, in addition to serving as deputy chief of staff under Trump. He served in the Secret Service for decades. Trump has long claimed that he requested the National Guard, but then House Speaker Nancy Pelosi failed to act on the request. All right. I seem to recall we interviewed the former secretary of defense who Disney Liz, he said, testified that there was no such thing. Mr. Produce, you remember that? And she and I went out a little bit dizzy, got very offended. Basil. I don’t know if I was calling you about her being angry, but was. And there they are. The they prepubescent munchkins over there meet her and they write it. And I think there’s like a this is news to these aholes. But here’s some news. This was let’s see, Mr. Butler. This was back on February 20, 23, a little over a year ago. Christopher Miller The acting cigarette fans who was in the room. Was on this program. What did he say about the National Guard And President Trump cut 14 go through you in the meeting January 3rd or January 4th, Prakash Patel and others in which President Trump offered or authorized National Guardsmen to protect the Capitol? Yeah, I was there. And that’s been totally that’s been totally misinterpreted by so many politically motivated, quote unquote, news outlets and politicians. Yeah, we were there. President was quite clear. He said provide whatever support you need to the dog on, you know, federal and local officials to protect protesters and demonstrators that day. Yeah I was with cash. Did he mention the National Guard, as cash has said, and others have said, Oh, yeah, yeah. That’s all that’s on the up and up. You know, the National Guard is, is, you know, but a lot of your listeners learning about this, the National Guard, he controls the National Guard and the District of Columbia because it’s not a state. Normally the governor does it. Since there’s no governor, the president does. He delegated that authority to me. And I was I was in charge of the National Guard for that for that episode and for those events. So, yeah, cash was there and president and he you know, he also called me, I think, on the fifth and talked about it. So, yeah, he was very clear about, you know, provide whatever support you need and in the authorization to provide, you know, whatever that was requested, wouldn’t it be strange to be authorizing whatever assistance was needed to protect the building and the people and including the National Guard, and then to encourage an insurrection? Don’t you think that would be weird? Well, Mark, you’re a lawyer. You know as well as I do. Capitol Hill is controlled by the legislative branch and the military is in the executive branch works for the president. And if you go up on Capitol Hill with military force without an invite from leadership there, we know what that’s called. That’s called a military coup. I, you know, wasn’t going to be part of that. And the president absolutely in no way, shape or form ever in that. It even implied that the. Military would be used inappropriately. Hmm. And back live now, how does Liz Cheney square that? She doesn’t. How come none of this? I mean, I question the man. He’s not even under oath. So what gives? That’s what he said. We have an inspector general report that says pretty much the same thing. We have cash. Patel So she smears Cash. Patel, who served in the military, who was a prosecutor. Good man. Well, you can’t believe him. And Mollie Hemingway, one of the best writers around. Oh, she’s a bozo. Oh, good. Dizzy Lizzy. Very good. And you’re a liar. And you’re contemptible. That’s what you are. Your new found notoriety. What, because you disagree with Trump on foreign policy? Absolutely grotesque. You are Nancy Pelosi’s plaything. And you want on that committee notice somebody wanted to get to the fact you weren’t on that committee as somebody who want to seek and destroy and you’ve been doing it ever since and you think I’m going about town to you, a roll over could give a few media knuckleheads or Mark Levin. I don’t give it. You know what? How come you don’t come online layers and tell them how you got 13 of my emails, which, by the way, had nothing to do with any of this? How did you get 13 of my emails? Dizzy, Lizzy. Boy, I hope they put you under oath because I’m going to ask a congressman ask you exactly that question. You need to be put under oath, under penalty of perjury. Yes. Like you did everybody else. You especially because you’re out there more than anybody else. We want to know how that information was destroyed and why. We want to know if you know about it. Let alone had a role in it. No accusation. Just Shane under oath. What do you run it from? Why won’t you come on my program? Why do you only go to friendly programs and won’t ask any questions? There you heard the Secretary of Defense on my show. What about it, Liz? And here is this guy. He gives testimony and they kill it. They kill it. There’s a committee hearing, mind you. When it comes to the National Guard’s statement about having 10,000 troops or other number of troops, Do you recall was the question to the former deputy chief any discussion prior to the sixth about whether and how many National Guard troops to deploy on January 6th? This was the question asked to Mr. or nado by the committee. I remember he had he was on the phone with Bozer. That’s the mayor of D.C. We I had walked in for something and I was there and he was on the phone with her and wanted to make sure she had everything that she needed because I think it was the concern of anti and pro groups. Clashing is what I recall, and not anywhere near the Capitol that this was just out on the mall area at the event. He wanted to know if she needed any more Guardsmen. That’s what he said under oath. And it never saw the light of day. Does he, Lizzie? Why is that? Why? So we have questions being raised, serious questions about Hutchison and the media. Why are they taking up all this dirt here? They’re trying to get less. Amato went on to cite the 10,000 Guardsmen number, according to the transcript, arguing Trump wanted to make sure that you have enough, quote unquote. And I remember, he says, the number of 10,000 coming up. You know, the president wants to make sure that you have enough you know, he’s willing to ask for 10,000. He didn’t order 10,000 letters, which is the damn word game you’re playing. He offered 10,000. And why didn’t you put this in your report, Liz? Why didn’t you let this man testify publicly so the nation could hear what he said? Liz? Because you’re a Soviet Politburo type. That’s why all these years pretending to be otherwise. You want to topple a president now, you want to topple a candidate. Be honest with yourself. Let’s. Now, now, now that you said it, he said it reminded. He reminded me of it. And that she was all set. She had, I think it was like 350. So for intersection control, this is Bowser and those types of thing, not in the law enforcement capacity at that time. And then that’s the only thing I recall with that number. 10,000 National Guardsmen. Bowser ultimately asked for over 300 National members, Guardsmen questioning that they not be armed, not only work to assess police, Varnado said in his interview with the committee that after Bowser’s refusal for additional National Guard members, the White House requested the Defense Department have a quick reaction force on hand. They can’t allow this testimony public at the time. They’re ignoring it and trashing it if they’re not ignoring it at CNN and MSNBC and the major Democrat Party news platforms, they have the little flunkies, the little pukes, the little prepubescent, said Media Matters, media aide and the others out there trying to trash people who raise it because they don’t want the truth. She understand, was an insurrection. Trump shouldn’t even be on the ballot. He needs to be prosecuted over January, so he needs to be thrown in prison for the rest of his life under the Ku Klux Klan Act. Don’t you understand? We have a narrative here. We have a purpose here. Get the hell out of the way. How dare you look into this? You’re a liar, Liz. A serial liar. Unless you prove otherwise. You should offer yourself right now to go up to that committee and testify under oath and do it without a lawyer. Les, you’re a lawyer. Do it without a lawyer. I’ll be right back.

Segment 4
Tremendous amount of things you can cut, maybe precisely for a tremendous amount of things you can do, not cut. You should. I I’m the bottom line is he’s still at it. Mr. Produce. You got to add that to the to the bumblers. There. He was in New Hampshire today, rallying his troops, a juggernaut. By the way, I heard somehow I was having lunch and I hate Trump. I could never vote for him. I just can’t stand the guy. It was all I could do, Mr. Brit, is to keep my mouth shut. Guy looks like a punk who was on the government payroll. His life probably retired after 20 years down in Florida, getting his tan, enjoying life. Paul Biden is destroying life for everybody else. But he’s fine. This guy’s. I was grinding my teeth. Luckily wasn’t there with my wife. She was. She would. She’d let him have it. I’ll be right back.