March 1st, 2024

On Friday’s Mark Levin Show, Jack Smith is forcing all of the courts to abide by his demand or else the judges will be pressured, all in an effort to have the Donald Trump cases resolved before the election. Smith is exposing himself of intentionally interfering in the 2024 election and doing the work of President Biden by continuing to demand the Trump case be resolved before the vote. Biden is keeping the public pressure on Trump by calling him a dictator and an existential threat, and we have radical leftists in the media and Congress trashing the Supreme Court justices for doing their job. Nikki Haley is the worst of the worst chameleons and wants the cases heard before November, and is now a mouthpiece for Jack Smith, Alvin Bragg, Fani Willis, and the Biden DOJ. Also, Biden has decided to be on the side of evil vs good, terrorist’s vs democracy, by choosing to airlift supplies into Gaza for terrorists. The October 7^th attack in Israel were funded by Biden, who has supported terrorist groups in the Middle East through Iran. Next, there is an interesting ruling out of a D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals panel regarding people involved in the January 6 attack. People were given enhanced sentences just for being present at the Capitol, especially for people just walking around and breaking no laws. Later, Mark is joined by Blaze Media reporter Steve Baker about being handcuffed and shackled after voluntarily turning himself in to the FBI for his presence in the Capitol on January 6 to report the event. Finally, Mark speaks with Utah Senate candidate Trent Staggs about running for Mitt Romney’s Senate seat and his upcoming campaign.

Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP

The podcast for this show can be streamed or downloaded from the Audio Rewind page.

Rough transcription of Hour 1

Segment 1
Hello America. Mark Levin here. Our number 877-381-3811. 877-381-3811. Two great guests later in the show, Steve Baker, Blaze media reporter who was arrested today, Mr. Producer. But the Biden regime. Been all powerful, expanding police state. And he’s going to come on the program and explain exactly what took place. And what happened on January six, because this is so out of control. So completely out of control. And of course, the media are. Defending him? Not nothing. Crickets. So I want to get into that. And we have a guest to the third hour is a conservative. Of course, they’re smearing him. The rhinos are smearing him in Utah, who is running for the United States Senate to replace Romney. Sooner the better. Sooner, the better. So there’s a lot to cover. I want to start with these legal cases, and we’re going to move into the immigration issues. A lot going on today with that. I want to go on to Joe Biden now wants to airlift aid into Gaza. No other place on the face of the earth, by the way. He does want to airlift aid to the wiggers. He does want to airlift food. To the people in Syria. That’s when I airlift food. It’s it’s Gaza. So. Joe Biden has finally made his decision. He will be on the side of evil against good. He will be on the side of terrorists against democracy. He will be on the side of his Islamist base led by Talib and other Jew haters and America haters. And I just hope people take this into consideration. This is a huge moral decision. Whether you’re going to stand with terrorists or not. Joe Biden, still the white supremacist, segregationist and racist. And now he stands with terrorists. As I said the other day, October 7th, was backed by Iran. It was Iran’s idea, but it was paid for by Joe Biden. We’re going to discuss all these things, by the way, on Life, Liberty and live in 8 p.m. Eastern Time Saturday. We also have our Sunday show, Life, Liberty and Living Sunday, 8 p.m. Eastern time, same time, same place. If you’re not sure if you’re going to be able to watch alive, please go ahead and set your DVR, because these are two killer shows, Sunday show. We’re going to have Chip Roy and Ted Cruz. And on Saturday show in my opening, I make a strong defense. Of America’s founding and Christianity. Because if I don’t do it, nobody else is going to do it. Let’s be honest. Now, we have an interesting and very interesting decision out of the DC Circuit. Now, I don’t know who was on the three judge panel that makes all the difference in the world because it’s become a very radical circuit. But I suspect that for the most part, it was not the radical judges. And this is how ABC News rated Alexander Mallin. A D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals panel issued a ruling really recently. Late this afternoon that could impact scores of prison terms handed down to rioters convicted and sentenced for joining the January six, 2021 assault on the U.S. Capitol. That’s their sentence. There’s a lot of the people in prison didn’t assault anything or anyone. And I’ve been behind this microphone condemning even a judge that I’ve known for decades for the kinds of sentences that they’ve been issuing. Against these people. Way out of line. Way, way, way out of line. And I’m not talking about people who are sort cops. I’m talking about the vast majority of those that are put in prison. Who didn’t saw cops. The three judge panel ruled that defendants convicted of obstructing the congressional certification had received improper enhancements of their sentences from district court judges. Who determined their actions amounted to, quote, substantial interference with the administration of justice, unquote. The challenge to the enhancement was brought in the case of convicted writer Larry Brock, as they write, who was sentenced in 2023 to 2 years in prison for his felony conviction of obstructing Congress’s work. In their ruling. You know, most of these people have not been able to get a fair shake. The judges are treating them like it’s an assembly line. They barely even listen to their cases. I’ve had people observing this and getting back to me. It’s just one after another after another. Judges are barely awake while they’re listening to this case. It’s it’s it’s a disgusting. Spectacle. In their ruling, the panel of judges upheld Brock’s conviction, but ordered the district judge overseeing his case to resentence him and remove the enhancement he had previously included, which in many instances has paved the way for judges to increase the length of prison terms for writers. For more than a year. And many of them are not writers. Let’s be blunt. Many of them are, quote unquote, trespassers. But ABC News is not a real news organization. So many of these people have got enhanced sentences. Substantial interference with the administration of justice Wire Because they didn’t substantially interfere with the administration of justice. Some of them were roaming around in the Capitol building. Some of them were waved in. To the Capitol building by security. We did absolutely nothing. Some of them were there literally 4 minutes and turned around left. And they got enhanced sentences. In the ruling, the panel of judges again. They ordered the judge in Brock’s case, and I suppose in the rest of the cases to look at these enhanced sentences and to reverse them. It’s not immediately clear, they write, whether the Justice Department plans to appeal the ruling, that is to the full, full court. You see, they would they didn’t afford Donald Trump that right. And they rule on the immunity issue and it goes straight to the Supreme Court. He had six days. But now, of course, the government and that includes the court, will not do the same thing to itself. So they may appeal it to the full court. It could impact scores of cases already handed down by judges in cases where they accepted similar enhancements recommended by prosecutors. Basically, what you’re getting a rubber stamp judges with the prosecutors in Washington, D.C.. This is why one of the key things that the House Judiciary Committee must look into. And if the Senate goes Republican, that committee must look into and it’s something I’m going to be pushing very, very hard is breaking up the cabal of judges in Washington, D.C., breaking up their jurisdiction. There’s no reason for this. None. And because all these cases right now are funneled through the most liberal district courts, the most liberal circuit court. Congress has the power under the United States Constitution to break that up because these district courts and the circuit court in Washington, D.C. were all created by Congress. The number of judges on these courts created by Congress. They write, The argument boils down to whether the administration of justice enhancement should apply to the congressional proceedings that were disrupted during the January six attack. Prosecutors have argued the statute fits, quote unquote, comfortably with the certification as it involved Congress’s performance of duties required by law. While defense attorneys have insisted and argued it should narrowly apply to judicial or grand jury proceedings. They’re talking about this obstruction. In part. Under the Enron law, which has all gone all the way to the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court needs to address it because nothing fits comfortably within that. Nothing. So if Congress wants to pass a new law or change the law, it can do it. But prosecutors, the Department of Justice and rogue judges cannot. The appeals court panel agreed with Brock’s argument. Ruling administration of justice does not extend to the unique congressional function of certifying Electoral College votes. The plain, natural, ordinary meaning of the phrase administration of justice is the governmental process of investigating, determining and enforcing the legal rights of persons. The panel said this definitely was not a panel of a bunch of wide eyed leftists on this court. The ruling comes as the Justice Department is preparing to make its case before the Supreme Court tonight, overturning a key felony obstruction charge used against hundreds of rioters and protesters that defense attorneys have argued stretches beyond what the statute intended. It clearly does. It clearly does. The Enron obstruction issue dealing with. You know, the destruction of documents by executives in anticipation of investigations and congressional hearings has absolutely nothing to do with what took place on January 6th. And every one of these damn judges know. They wish it did. So they rewrite the statute. These are supposed to be judges. They’re supposed to be referees. Arguments over the obstruction of an official proceeding charge, which is also among the charges Special Counsel Smith brought in his indictment against former President Trump are scheduled for next month. So you can see that what Jack Smith has done, what the Biden administration has done, is they’ve raised all these issues and they’ve created all these constitutional confrontations, taking a statute that dealt with Enron, executive corporations that are under investigation or potentially under investigation, potential hearings in front of Congress, they destroy the materials and so forth. So Congress passes this law narrowly focused on these kinds of business activities, and they apply it to Trump and they apply it to these protesters. It has nothing to do with it. Zero in every one of these damn district court judges swallowed it. HALL And then one went beyond. Prosecutors go and we need an enhancement these people are trying to prevent. The actual Electoral College from being voted on. Okay. Even if you’re right, which are not. Since it wasn’t an insurrection, since nobody’s even been charged with violence. In fact, only a handful have been charged with an insurrection, which is only been used since the damn civil War. Even. Even the Puerto Rican Independence Nationalist Movement. Which from the House gallery shot numerous members of the House of Representatives, one in the chest. They were not even charged with insurrection. How many people were shot by the insurrectionists, quote unquote, on January six? Not one. Some insurrection. Even the insurrection statute doesn’t apply. Even the sedition and conspiracy commit sedition. They didn’t apply. Not a single on the books. In the criminal code charge involving violence. Except those who actually harm police officers. Which hard. These were trespassers. At a maximum the overwhelming majority, and they’ve gotten prison sentences. And they’ve had enhanced sentences. On obstruction, on an obstruction statute that doesn’t even fit what they did. Now, that’s before the Supreme Court because Jack Smith pushed the issue immunities in front of the Supreme Court, because Jack Smith pushed the issue, The speed with which these trials had to be held was was before. The Supreme Court, which rejected it because Jack Smith pushed the issue. The issue of whether you can charge a president with a violation of the Espionage Act, which clearly wasn’t intended. Because Jack Smith pushed the issue. The lack of due process for Donald Trump when it came to attorney client privilege in a documents case. Because Jack Smith pushed the issue and now Jack Smith. Drags his sorry ass down to Florida. And he and his people tell us. District Judge Aileen Cannon. Well, you know, we don’t think. When we’re interviewing jurors through this process and voir dire and so forth. That Trump’s lawyer should be able to ask anybody about their voting records. Why? Because Jack Smith wanted to take all rights, all processes away. He wants to have a jury not of Trump’s peers, but of his making. He wants to create the process by which Donald Trump would be tried. He has burned the Constitution in a thousand different ways. And I want to get into what took place in Florida, because it’s not getting enough attention. When we come back. I’ll be right back.

Segment 2
All right, America. So in the Florida courtroom, let me just step back from this. This is a judge who’s painting by the numbers. In other words, she’s doing her job good, bad or indifferent, unlike the judges in the D.C. Circuit, unlike the Democrat judges in New York. And so she’s come under blistering attack from the truly sickening leftist propagandists that populate most of the American media. I’ve never seen anything like this. Again, historically, if you read about the French Revolution and you read about. The justice, quote unquote, that took place. Blood in the streets for ten years. In an effort not not just to overthrow the king and so forth, but to destroy the society. This is as close as it gets with the guillotine. The guillotine was working day and night for years. Phony trials off of their head. That’s where it comes from. That’s what’s taking place here. It’s all dressed up as a justice system. As they say, they Potemkin justice system. But the rush to do these things, to undermine tradition, to cut corners on the Constitution. And why?

Segment 3
The Trump team of lawyers contained objections from the Smith team regarding the voting records of potential jurors. Why is that? Is that relevant? Seems to me it is. On page ten, the team said they have questions such as Are you registered to vote or you register with a particular party? And did you vote in 2020 presidential election? Remove from the questionnaire that will be presented to potential jurors. Those questions, according to the document, were proposed to the judge by the former president. Why is that a problem? The proposal from Trump did not specify specifically what candidate the potential draft voted for in 2020, just the political party. Now, the suggestion from the Trump team was to check all that apply from what news outlets they read and to rank all that apply. The special counsel’s team wanted sections of that redacted to show what the special counsel doesn’t want. Is for President Trump’s lawyers to figure out if people who are going to sit in judgment of Trump, what party or if they’re even registered to vote, if they voted in 2020, and what news entities they watch. Why is that a problem? When you want to know that. Ladies and gentlemen, if you’re liberty and your life is on the line. As for the former president’s lawyers, they objected to a Smith proposal. Have you read about or heard about the FBI’s execution of a search warrant at the Mar a Lago Club in August 2022? They also wanted this line removed. Have you seen, read about or heard about any statements by Mr. Trump about his investigation? President Trump’s attorneys also wanted to include the line An indictment is not evidence. It is a document that sets forth the charges. Now, why do they want this? Because what Smith has done in the indictment, they call these talking indictments and they’re highly inappropriate. Is he basically has political opinions. And so Trump’s lawyers say they want to include this line. An indictment is not evidence. It’s a document that sets forth the charges made against a defendant. It’s an accusation. It may not be considered as any evidence whatsoever of a defendant’s guilt. Can you think of any reason that would interfere with your ability to follow and apply this principle of law? What is wrong with that? Mr. Smith and his prosecutors objected. They also objected to a line that sought to determine if the juror had, quote unquote, negative views about a certain politician. What’s wrong with that? Later on, prosecutors objected to whether the jurors are familiar with two of President Trump’s co-defendants. Now he’s charged him with 41 felonies over nothing. Nothing. And so the judge has these issues she has motions to deal with. And so, of course, we have the prosecutor who says, hey, look, we’re ready to go in early July. Let’s get going with this thing, for crying out loud. We’ve unleashed resources. You know, we’ve got all this stuff going on. Let’s go. The Trump lawyers said, look, we might be ready in August, but we actually need time to go through everything and defend our client. Uh, and, you know, address the motions, the judges to make decisions on motions, which impacts how they’re going to respond. And so she hinted that the trial may not start in May. And just look at what this guy, Jack Smith is doing, how he’s forcing all these courtrooms. To deal with his demand. And should they not? Accede to his demands, then these judges and justices will come under attack. They’ll be pressured. But what’s the what’s the. Well, you know, we need to know before the before the election. Don’t they prove that this whole thing. Is intended to interfere with the election. The more they say that we need this done before the election, we have a right to know. And every one of these 91 charges, every single one of them, is bogus. A clean act, the Enron Act, the Federal Contractors Act. Excuse me. The Espionage Act, obstruction of the Espionage Act, RICO Statute. Federal election laws. Used by a local prosecutor to try and create state felonies. They’re all way outside the bounds, and you’re supposed to be very careful to not interfere with elections. You’re supposed to be very careful when you go after a former president and a presidential candidate. You’re supposed to be very careful not to do damage to the constitutional system. And yet they’re doing all these things. All of them. Listen to this from NewsBusters. One of the great sites of all time. Supreme Court says, ah, we’re going to take up this issue of immunity. I mean, after all. It is a major constitutional issue and it requires some attention. And so the media outlets are furious because they have a timeline. And their timeline is Biden’s timeline. And Biden’s timeline is to get this done. Defeat Trump. So the Republicans don’t even have a nominee. Think about that. What happens if Donald Trump is the nominee, which he will be? August passed. We’re now in September, October, November. One of these trials goes on. One of these juries finds Donald Trump guilty of something. And then the prosecution says, okay. Now sentence him. So the incredible interference in the election and the outcome that they want is not just the imprisonment of Donald Trump, but the Republicans won’t even a candidate for president, for God sakes. I’m the first one to mention this. What are they going to do, hold another convention on Halloween? What are they going to do? They’re not even set up for something like this. And Biden knows it. Which is why Biden’s keeping the public pressure on Trump as a dictator. Trump threatens democracy. It’s an existential threat. Trump’s excuse me, Biden’s surrogates in the media, Biden’s surrogates and the Democrat Party. His surrogates pushing the same agenda. So the Supreme Court says, let’s take a look at this. Oh, my God, it’s the mega court. So now we literally have. Radical leftist in the media. Never Trumpers in the media. Elected members, Democrats in Congress, trashing the justices for doing their job. Now, they’ll be perfectly happy. If they rule against Trump, then it’ll be a good Amotekun Yeah, it’s great. They shouldn’t have taken it anyway. I mean, we had this fast track, we got the meat head judges in DC who were doing what we wanted them to do. They were short circuiting it. Fast arguments. No full appeal to the court. They had seven days, six days to get to the Supreme Court. Now, the Supreme Court slowed it down for a couple of months, and we can’t have that. We have a right to know what Donald Trump is requiring. And the whole thing is geared to election interference. George STEPHANOPOULOS. Jon Karl. Dan Abrams, David Muir, Devin Dwyer. Kate Shaw. Laura Jarrett. All Democrats. And if they’re not Democrats, they should be. But we know what George STEPHANOPOULOS is. Not only is he a dwarf, but he’s a hateful, lousy puke Democrat born out of the Clinton White House. His anti-woman. War room that George STEPHANOPOULOS headed. So of course, that was a resume enhancement for ABC that hired him. He’s a punk. Jon Karl, who’s made more money off a trashing Trump in books. Another punk, Dan Abrams, who founded Media ate a lousy low IQ website for prepubescent low IQ leftists. Dan Abrams. Jerry Springer of Court TV. Dan Muir, another leftist. And so forth and so on. Listen to this montage, ABC News, NBC News and the rest of them. Here’s NewsBusters. Cut ten. Go. We begin with the Supreme Court agreeing to hear Donald Trump’s claim that he is immune to prosecution on federal charges of attempting to overturn the 2020 election. That puts his trial on hold, serving the former president’s strategy of pushing his trials past the presidential. Excuse me. Excuse me, dummy. What do you expect Trump to do to roll over and play dead? Yes. Yes, I’ll do whatever you want. Yes. Yes. I won’t raise serious constitutional objections. Yes. Yes. Forget about due process, attorney client privilege, whatever you want, Government, whatever you want. Prosecute. Listen to how stupid these people are. And as I said. And as I said. This morning on Fox and Friends. And as I’ve said to you behind this microphone, they better hope Trump wins that case. Because if he doesn’t and he does become president under whatever circumstances. Then he can go after Joe Biden for his criminal acts in terms of violating the Espionage Act. The precedent will be set. Violating immigration laws. The door will be wide open. Wide open. In the imbecile defense won’t work. There’s enough probable cause here to charge Joe Biden. With 100 felonies. Right, Georgie. You schmuck. Go ahead. I didn’t take up the issue of presidential immunity. The Supreme Court has effectively delayed the most far reaching criminal case against Donald Trump. DeLay is already something of a Trump victory, raising the real possibility that the trial could be pushed back until after the U.S.. You see, the baseline is the government should get what it wants and the courts should accommodate the government. After all, we’re all the same party. Just listen to the media. And they all say the same thing. You know where they’ll be this weekend. They’ll all be at the same cafes. They’ll be at the same social events. They’ll all be patting each other on the back. They’re all be shaking their heads about Donald Trump and the toxic cauldron that follows him around and support him. Sickening, isn’t it? This is why the media is dying. This is why everybody hates the media. This is why CNN is on the brink. MSNBC and NBC would be on the brink. But for the fact that Comcast. You know, supports them, finds them. All these media outlets, we go broke except for Fox. Go ahead election with this delay. Even if the trial was able to happen before the election and would likely take place against the backdrop of the political conventions later in the summer or in the heat of the fall campaign. Possibly, George, after voters in several states have already started casting their vote. We can’t have that. No, no, no. Look, we’ve got all these 91 charges. We’ve got them out of Alan Bragg, Democrat, DEA, corrupt. We’ve got them out of Atlanta. Fannie and her Wallace. Corrupt. Got the January six stuff corrupt. We’ve got the Espionage Act now we use be corrupt. Come on now. 91 charges. We don’t know. There we go. You know, we impeach the guy twice. We had a criminal investigation of the guy in here. There’s no way he’s going to escape. New York and Atlanta and Washington, D.C., and what we’re doing in Florida. No way. Now, come on, now. Trump shouldn’t put up a defense. He should have a right to an appeal. No, no, no, no. We’ve got this all set up in Washington, D.C., and there comes along the Supreme Court. They want to take a look at this. Now, who sounds like Putin and the Stalinist? Who is it that’s anti-democratic, a.k.a. anti-Republican Constitution? And listen to this media. That’s the state run media. That’s what I wrote about in on freedom of the press. That’s what I wrote about. And the Democrat Party hates America. Listen to this scum. And that’s what they are. They’re scum. Go ahead. This question of immunity is not likely to be a close call if they’re going to rule against Donald Trump there. So why take it? This really is all about the clock. Who said that? STEPHANOPOULOS. What kind of a punk is this guy? So I take it if you’re going to rule against it, what is he? He’s a tyrant. Mr. Producer. I know it’s. It’s almost hopeless. Would you invite George STEPHANOPOULOS onto the program? Go ahead. It has always been about the clock. And now this is a really big win for Donald Trump. Practically, there is absolutely no shut up, you morons. It’s just one stupid after another. It’s not a big win for Donald Trump. And he has to go to the Supreme Court to appeal a decision by a lower court. How is that a big win? That timing. The timing. We reprobates low IQ Democrats. It’s that timing. If they rule against Donald Trump, they’ll be thrilled. And in the end, if they rule against Donald Trump, I predict right now that Joe Biden could well be indicted when he leaves the presidency because special counsel Alhurra gave us a thousand different ways to do it. I’ll be right back.

Segment 4
But just very quickly, yes or no, should Trump’s classified document case go to trial, do you think, before November? I think all of the cases should be dealt with before November. We need to know what’s going to happen before it happened before the presidency happens, because after that, should he become president. I don’t think any of it’s going to get heard. My God, Ladies and gentlemen, she’s the worst of the worst chameleons. She’s all in with attacking the Constitution, our justice system, our republic. They should all be here before November. What about the constitutional issues? What about due process? What about the motions? It doesn’t matter. Nikki wants at all her before November. Because we need to know where we stand. America. So she’s now a mouthpiece for Jack Smith, for Alvin Bragg, for Fanny Willies. She’s now a mouthpiece for the United States Department of Justice. She’s now a mouthpiece for Joe Biden who wants exactly the same thing. Nikki Haley. Nikki Haley. Is a mouthpiece for what’s being done to our justice system for the police state. Democrat, district Attorneys, Democrat, Special counsel, Democrat, cities, Democrat juries, Democrat judges. Nikki Haley’s all in. She is a desperate politician. For relevance and she’s going to the media. That is a clip put out by NBC News for this Sunday. Kristen Welker. They don’t even have an audience. But Nikki Haley won’t come on this program. I can’t say I blame her. But she’s all in America with destroying our Constitution because she’s going to save the country. I know this. Just read The Wall Street Journal editorial page. I’ll be right back.