On Monday’s Mark Levin Show, lawlessness has now enshrined congress, the state bar associations, and Clarence and Ginni Thomas. We begin with a federal judge named David Carter who claims that it’s quite likely that former President Trump committed federal offenses on January 6th, 2021, and attempted to obstruct the counting of the electoral vote. If true, this is not a crime. This judge has not received any information from a grand jury and should have never made this non-factual outrageous statement. All citizens, president and otherwise, have a right to challenge the counting of electoral votes. Americans need to stand up to tyranny on the court and everywhere else. Then, the media operates in a pack mentality like a gang as they exploit in favor of radical leftwing activism. Their attack remains on conservative activist Ginni Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Despite having any evidence of conflicts, the left is echoing calls for Justice Thomas to recuse himself from any cases related to the 2020 election or the Capitol riot. Later, once upon a time, the Hollywood awards shows were a class act, but what Will Smith did was trashy. Chris Rock remarkably held his own and responded like a gentleman.
THIS IS FROM
Fox News
Federal judge says Trump ‘likely’ violated federal obstruction statute
CNN
January 6 Committee will seek interview with Ginni Thomas, sources say
Bloomberg
Ginni Thomas’s Pro-Trump Texts Put Husband’s Court Role in Focus
Washington Post
Ethics experts see Ginni Thomas’s texts as a problem for Supreme Court
Washington Post
Inside Ted Cruz’s last-ditch battle to keep Trump in power
The Blue State Conservative
“Will Smith Just Smacked The S*** Out Of Me”: Oscars Reaches New Lows With Physical Assault On Host Chris Rock (VIDEO)
Rumble
MSNBC: Almost Two Thirds Of Americans Disapprove of Biden’s Handling Of Economy
Newsbusters
‘A Huge Red Flag’: Chuck Todd Panics Over GOP Lead in NBC Midterm Poll
Washington Post
Putin’s purge of ‘traitors’ scoops up pensioners, foodies and peaceniks
American For Tax Reform
Manchin Wants $1 Trillion Tax Increase
Just The News
Congressional Democrats’ antitrust legislation could cost U.S. economy $319 billion, study warns
NBC NY
Manhattan Lost 6.9% of Its Population in 2021, the Most of Any Major U.S. County
Post Millennial
Louisiana Supreme Court rules BLM organizer can be sued by people injured during riot
The podcast for this show can be streamed or downloaded from the Audio Rewind page.
Image used with permission of Getty Images / Megan Varner
Rough transcript of Hour 1
Hour 1 Segment 1
I’m going to start the program this evening with something a little different. We will get into what’s happening in Ukraine, of course, in Iran. And now China is poised to attack Taiwan. But first, the lawlessness that is now enshrined in our court system. The lawlessness that is now enshrined in Congress. The lawlessness that is enshrined in the American Bar Association and the state bar associations. The war. Well, Clarence and Ginni Thomas yet again. Really as a diversion from Judge Jackson, who should never serve on the United States Supreme Court. Just appalling. I began with a federal judge appointed by Bill Clinton in 1998. By the name of David Carter. He’s in the central district of California. And of course, he’s on the left, you know, he served in the military, so be it, there are people on the left who served in the military. We know this, and they’ll be more of them by the time the critical race theoreticians are done, unfortunately. But I want to read something to you which had caused this judge to be suspended, if not disbarred. A federal judge says Trump, quote, likely, unquote, violated federal obstruction statute by Ron Blitzer. Fox News.com, United States District Court Judge David Carter said in a Monday ruling today that former President Donald Trump likely committed federal offenses by attempting to prevent the counting of electoral votes during a joint session of Congress on January six, 2021. Quote, Based on the evidence, the court finds it more likely than not that President Trump corruptly attempted to obstruct the joint session of Congress on January six, 2021, Carter said, claiming that the evidence suggests that Trump violated a federal statute dealing with corruptly obstructing, influencing, impeding an official proceeding or attempting to do so. Now, this judge has collected no evidence of any kind whatsoever. This judge hasn’t been presented. With grand jury information or prosecutorial motions or briefs, her filings of any kind respecting President Trump. He is simply giving his uninformed, unsubstantiated opinion. As an adjudicator. A fact and an applier of law. And what he did here was an absolute disgrace and an absolute disgrace, but he knows he can get away with it. Because the California Bar Association is completely out of control. And there’s no such thing anymore. As blind justice, not anymore. No judge should make a comment like this. No, judge. He has the potential for influencing investigators, the Department of Justice, grand jury, should it come to that and jurors, should it come to that? It is an outrageous statement. At the Supreme Court. Should admonish this man for what he did. The California Supreme Court should, on its own, initiate an ethics investigation of this judge. And you will read that nowhere this evening in any of the news reports about how outrageously unethical this judge was in making that comment. Instead, you have blaring headlines which the judge knew would be the result. What he wrote. Carter’s determination, you see, it’s a determination a judge has made a determination on somebody’s innocence or guilt, or at least they’re smeared them from the bench where he hopes to be immune. He had no factual or legal basis for making any determination. It was part of a ruling in the case of John Eastman. Former law school dean at Chapman University, whose emails are being sought by the House committee investigating the capital riot, like Carter, recognized that a number of Eastman’s emails are protected by privilege. One e-mail that is not is subject to disclosure due to the exception to attorney client privilege pertaining to communications involving the commission of a crime. So this leftist Clinton appointed judge has gone way out on a limb and it’s OK by him. This ambiguous statute corruptly obstructing influence, repeating an official proceeding. So now if you write legal memoranda. That suggest a constitutional avenue. For challenging Electoral College, for challenging any aspect of the Constitution, I guess. You can, in fact, be accused. I’ve been impeding, obstructing influence, an official proceeding. Corruptly, corruptly. Corruptly. John Eastman didn’t do anything that was corrupt. Nothing. I’ve known this man for decades. He is the highest level of integrity and ethics, and I know when I speak this way, I come under attack. Well, ladies and gentlemen, these are very ugly, grave times that we live in. And you have to stand up to the tyranny, whether it comes from a judge in a black robe. Whether it comes from a rogue committee of Congress appointed by the speaker of the House. Or whether it comes to the media, you have got to stand up to this. Well, Spain didn’t do anything corruptly. Donald Trump didn’t do anything corruptly. How do we know? Because we were all witness to history. We don’t need it to be interpreted for us. What’s happening corruptly now? Not criminally, just politically and every other way is this January 6th committee. Is trying to write a documentary. Basically, they want to drag in as many Trump people as they can, and they had the full support of Liz Cheney. They had the full support of adding Kingsgrove to head cases, obviously the full support of Pelosi on the way out of the speaker’s office. This is what they want to do. Ladies and gentlemen. As they grease the skids. For a preposterous presidential runs. By Cheney and King Zinger to draw attention to themselves and draw attention to January six. Quote, President Trump attempted to obstruct an official proceeding by launching a pressure campaign to convince Vice President Pence to disrupt the joint session on January six, Carter wrote, pointing to Trump’s attempt to persuade Pence to reject electoral votes or delay counting them. That’s a crime. That’s a crime. If true, that’s not a crime. They’re trying to influence the vice president of the United States to take a look at the electors, to take a look if there was corruption and fraud and so forth and so on. How is that a crime? The Constitution is completely silent on this subject, silent. Then we have a statute. That’s over 150 years old or give or take about 150 years old. That is very ambiguous and contradictory. There are legitimate questions. About state legislatures agreeing to or not agreeing to electors. And any candidate, whether they’re president or not, has a right to challenge it, has a right to use the political process to raise questions, the political process to raise questions. That’s why the counting of electors is left to people like Judge Carter. It goes to the Congress to make a decision. To Congress, a political body. President Trump attempted to obstruct an official proceeding. By launching a pressure campaign to convince the vice president this sounds like those damn fools in Israel going after Netanyahu. Charging him with bribery because he thought positive press. As far as Trump satisfying the element of the statue, that requires somebody that corruptly the article goes on, Carter pointed out that the court has made clear that the threshold for acting corruptly is lower than consciousness of wrongdoing, meaning a person does not need to know their actions are wrong to break the law. Listen to this. Nobody knows those actions. Break the law. There have been efforts to influence the counting in the past, so are members of Congress subject to prosecution, to ladies and gentlemen, our members of Congress who object? Are they subject to prosecution? Carter use the above reasoning to justify the disclosure of one document under the crime fraud exception, an email chair that was forwarded to Eastman that included a draft memo for Rudy Giuliani, who is acting as Trump’s attorney in challenging the 2020 election results. That memo, Carter said, recommended that Vice President Pence reject electors from contested states on January six. So. First of all, what this judge has now done. By creating the. The image, the myth of a criminal act. You don’t have to have mens rea a C to commit a criminal act. It’s a very, very low bar. What does he do? He has a draft memo, attorney client privilege, attorney work product confidentiality. Revealed to the January 6th committee, why, because he agrees with the January 6th committee. The judge says the memos both intimately related to and clearly advanced the plan to obstruct the joint session of Congress on January six, 2021, but it wasn’t obstructed. On January six, 2021, the vice president made a different decision. And you call it obstruction when they’re trying to influence. And participate in a debate over whether or not those electors should be counted. There is nothing in American history that says. That’s a violation of the Constitution, the constitution is silent. Silent. Then he says, the judge. Adding that because it is likely furthered the crimes of obstruction of an official proceeding and conspiracy to defraud the United States, it should be disclosed an official conspiracy. To fraud, the United States. Shocking. On every level, there’s a shocking. This guy shouldn’t have passed the S.A.T.. Let alone be a federal judge, in my humble opinion. The judge has stepped out of his robe, he has stepped out of his courthouse, he stepped out of line. If Judge Carter would like to debate this issue with me, anyone? You’re welcome on any time, any time. Period. Now this committee is going to vote to hold. Two men close to President Trump in contempt. Because they won’t turn over information to the committee, even though they have nothing to do with anything. And so this is what’s going on, Judge Carter. More when I return
Hour 1 Segment 2
There’s now a new edition of that outrageous ruling with the January six. You can see the January six committees behind much of this. They’re using their power to subpoena information and then leak information. The Republicans are part of the cabal on that committee, so nobody is there actually representing the targets who I will call the victims. They have issued hundreds of subpoenas. Against scores of people who have absolutely nothing to do with the violence in that building. And we have a gulag of sorts in Washington, D.C.. Where dozens of your fellow Americans presently sit who didn’t commit any acts of violence. One man is facing several years in prison, he was waved into the building, one man committed suicide because he was told that despite being led on by prosecutors in Washington, they were going to throw the book at him. He’d been in the building seven or eight minutes. Give or take, he was waved in by the police, he stuck stuck behind the the velvet lines, he didn’t break anything. He didn’t assault anybody. It was too much for him to take. And he murdered himself. He killed himself. No sympathy whatsoever. Now, the target yet again that Thomas says, I want to address this when I return.
Hour 1 Segment 3
the media operate in a Packer gang mentality. They’re like Parana. Or Jackal’s. And they smell blood. And they are they are opportunists. They are exploiters and they are of the radical left. They are of the radical left. They’ve always wanted to silence Ginni Thomas because Ginni Thomas is a conservative activist. Now, keep in mind, we have a radical left wing activists dressed up as judges like Judge Carter, like more than half of the judges in Washington, D.C.. Like Sotomayor and Kagan and Breyer and more and more Roberts, quite frankly. But that’s OK. You’re wearing a robe and you push the country or pull the country in a particular direction. That’s fine. And of course, they used to talk about the independence of women. The women’s movement, now, they won’t define women. But they hate conservative women, they hate conservative blacks, they hate conservative Hispanics, they hate conservative Jews, they hate conservative Asians, they hate conservative gay people. And on and on and on. They hate them. They despise them. Because they go against the narrative that they seek to project onto the society. These are totalitarians. That’s what they are. CNN. Jamie Gangel, wasn’t she with ABC? She’s bounced around. Zachary Cohen, January six committee will seek interview with Ginni Thomas. Sources say so now we’re going to have an incredibly unprecedented situation. Unparalleled in American history, where a committee of Congress. A completely rogue committee that is doing the dirty work of the Democrat Party and the speaker of the House. Without any real Republican participation. It’s going to question a Supreme Court justices wife under oath unless she pleads the Fifth Amendment. The House Select Committee investigating January six will seek an interview with conservative activist Virginia Ginni Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, according to multiple sources familiar with the investigation. So they leaked to the media. It is a despicable, vile operation. Most members of the House Select Committee investigating January six, including chair Bernie Thompson and Vice Chair Liz Cheney, believe the panel should interview her. CNN reported early Monday. Yeah, because we all know Ginni Thomas was very violent that day. Oh, yeah. She broke into the Capitol building. She attacked police officers. Oh, she didn’t. Oh, well, while we know she organized the the events of she didn’t while we know she left pipe bombs at the RNC, but she didn’t. Well, we know she undermined the security of the building, but she didn’t, so what the hell are they talking to her for? You and I both know why. We have got to crush the Democrat Party. We have got to crush Liz Cheney in the primary. When are we having her opponent on here, Mr. Producer? Tomorrow. We’re going to help her when enough is enough. These people. Our vile. Vieaux. The committee has had ongoing discussions about Ginni Thomas and CNN reported last week that it has in its possession 20 text messages, leaks. They subpoena information and they leak it to the left that show her pleading with then White House Chief of staff Mark Meadows to continue the fight to overturn the 2020 presidential election results, first of all. So what if she pleaded with him to continue the fight? Secondly, the election results had not been confirmed. This is the point. They weren’t reversing the election. The election’s not over. Until the electors are counted by a joint session of Congress, which is why Democrats have historically objected to the counting of electors, and maybe they should have been rounded up. As corruptly interfering with an official proceeding, right, Judge Clark, moron. Now, listen to this. You know. This is a joke, this makes, quote, unquote, McCarthyism look like a joke, Thomas, a conservative activist, recently revealed that she attended the pro Trump rally that preceded the U.S. Capitol attack on January six, but says she played no role in planning the events of that day. Hundreds of thousands of people attended and. Play no role in the events of that day. But now you’re treated if you’re a January six or you get the Scarlet Letter one six on your forehead. A source with knowledge of the committee’s investigation, that means members of Congress there told CNN Thomas is one of many people the committee has been looking at. And that the committee has been moving aggressively on many fronts, conducting depositions, sometimes multiple depositions, almost every day, they’re in a big hurry. You see, before the midterms, they want to put out the report. They want to destroy the Republicans. They want to destroy Trump. The source added that while the committee understands the public interest in Thomas following the revelation of her text messages with Meadow’s, there are many other relevant witnesses. Nobody is interested except the Democrat Party in the left. But they’re going to hold more innocent people in contempt who refuse to comply. With a Salem witch trial. Unbelievable. But the constipated news network is not alone, of course. We have Bloomburg. Ginni Thomas is pro Trump tax, put her husband’s and focus O. You see, ladies and gentlemen. Because Ginni Thomas has her independent views, apparently unlike any of the other women married to men on the court and any of the other men married to women on the court, I think there’s only one other. But anyway, you get the point. Clarence needs to recuse himself. You see? Justice Clarence Thomas is facing facing calls to recuse himself from your Supreme Court. Cases involving the 2020 presidential election after revelations that his wife repeatedly pushed former President Donald Trump’s chief of staff to do more to overturn his loss to Joe Biden. Well, what does that have to do with his rulings on 20-20? You have to actually show that he has some kind of bias. Some kind of active role that would. Disqualify him. But they don’t have any of that. Now, if this is the new test, we need to know about all the wives who are married to the male members. Of the court, and we need to know about the one husband. I assume Sotomayor is married, I’m just going to guess. Kagan, I believe, is single. So we need to know. If they’ve made any donations, if they’ve ever supported somebody else, we need to know and they need to be questioned under oath and under penalty of perjury. But here they go, Thomas already participated in the Supreme Court’s decision this year to let some of Trump’s papers be turned over to a congressional panel investigating the January six, 2021, capital letter. It’s not a congressional panel. It is a rogue Stalinist committee. Appointed by Evea Pelosi, Thomas was the lone dissenter from that order, giving no explanation, and then they turned to Stephen Gillers, New York University Law School complete. Asked if you ask me, I think it’s a big problem. Justice Thomas should have recused himself from any case, that concern in any that hereafter concerns the validity of the election, the work on the January 6th commission or the Capitol invasion. Well, Stephen Gillers says it it must be true. The Washington Post. I told you. I told you, Parana. Reported Thursday, Ginni Thomas, a political activist. Again, she’s a political activist, but not one dressed up as a judge, which is a cancer throughout our judiciary. Was in close contact with Trump, chief of staff, blah, blah, blah. Wow. Wow, she needs to be punished, I think. Here’s The Washington Post. Ethics experts say Ginni Thomas tax is a problem for the court. Robert Barnes and Annie Marimo. Who are they? Nobody knows, a couple of schmucks and it goes on and on. It’s a very long article. The same Washington Post that couldn’t cover the Holocaust, they’re all over Ginni Thomas here, you know, the same Washington Post that covered up Hunter Biden. Nobody ever said whatever Hunter Biden does or did. Disqualified Joe Biden from anything, did they know? Of course not. Democrats on Capitol Hill said they were outraged by the messages and Justice Thomas’s participation in some of the election related cases that reached the high court, none of which were decided in Trump’s favor. One of the strongest reactions came from Ron Widen, Ron Widen as a freak of fraud and a phony guys like 17 feet tall. So real talk. Justice Thomas, conduct on the Supreme Court looks increasingly corrupt. I’m waiting for them to call for impeachment. See, they’re trying to destroy. Clarence Thomas. By trying to destroy Ginni Thomas. This committee is a wrecking ball committee, that’s its job that sets real direction, wouldn’t you love to have the text messages between committee members and committee staff, between committee members and the media, between committee members and evea Pelosi? Wouldn’t you love to have those communications? Wow. I wonder what that would show these phony politicians all in horror. Oh, I can’t believe this is going on trading stock while pushing legislation or blocking legislation. Cheating on their wives or their birthing partners? Sleazeballs galore, sleazeballs galore up there on Capitol Hill. Destroying our country from within, whether it’s the cops or the military, the border or our our finances. But Ginni Thomas. She’s a problem. She needs to be deposed and Clarence Thomas needs to recuse himself. This is all crap, this is all manufactured crap. Ladies and gentlemen, stand up to it, speak out against it to the same damn media that covered up for Hunter Biden, the same damn media that came up with a a phony whistle blower, the same damn media that pushed Russia collusion for a year after year after year, that same damn media that applauds when SWAT teams, SWAT teams break into the homes of innocent human beings, the same damn media. Well, it’s the same damn media, I’ll be right back.
Hour 1 Segment 4
OK, Mr. Producer, today’s Washington Post. Early in the morning, a huge piece, Michael Ticos column after column. Inside Ted Cruz’s last ditch battle to keep Trump in power. So now it’s time to trash Cruz say they’ve done to Santos. They’ve done Trump, they’ve done Thomas, we got to we got to do Cruz anything on Hunter Biden No, no, no, please focus. Texas Senator Zaphod alienated some allies and sparked questions about ties to. John Eastman. A long time friend and author of key legal memos and Trump’s efforts. Senator Ted Cruz was dining near the Capitol on the evening of December eight, 2020, it starts, writes Michael Kranish, if that is his name, when he received an urgent call from President Trump. A lawsuit had just been filed at the Supreme Court designed to overturn the election. Trump had lost and the president wanted help from the Texas Republican. Would you be willing to argue the case? Trump, as Cruz as a senator, later recalled it? Sure, I’d be happy to if the court granted a hearing, Cruz said. He responded. The call was just one step in a collaboration, collaboration that for two months turned the once bitter political enemies into close allies and the effort to keep Trump in the White House based on the president’s false claims about a stolen election. Now, that’s not what happened based on a stolen election. We all read what took place. Senator Cruz was a clerk at the Supreme Court and Senator Cruz is a litigator, particularly at the appellate level, including at the Supreme Court prior to becoming a senator. The case that Ted Cruz was prepared to argue was the constitutional case coming out of Pennsylvania. The issue there being. The Constitution of the United States. Which only the state legislators acting together in a state legislature can change the election laws through which electors are chosen. That was the case. Not about overturning a stolen election, upholding the United States Constitution. And it goes on and on and on the amount of propaganda and lies, disinformation, misinformation, that’s why as a group. The American media are the modern Russia Pravda or TASC, if you prefer, they are liars, they’re ideologues, they are activists, they’re are not journalists. Quite the opposite..