On Thursday’s Mark Levin Show, Big Tech, Big Media, former and current Speakers of the US House of Representatives, The Bush’s, the Trudeau’s, the Biden’s, and the corporatists in America are in the pocket of Chinese leader Xi Jing Ping. The Founders discussed the idea of a unicameral Congress, and it was rejected in favor of a bicameral system focused on individual liberty because the more autocratic the government could become it would. Then, if the media were honest, they’d call out Congress for their January 6th sham committee. They would call out President Biden for his Bolshevik stance on dividing the country over the Jim Crow 2.0 act that they claim is about voting rights. Biden and the Democrat party are lighting fuses and instigating ill will with their lies that Republicans are making it harder for minorities to vote. Later, it’s interesting that public school children aren’t taught about the 15 high-ranking officials of the Nazi bureaucracy met in Berlin to hatch “The organizational, logistical and material steps for a final solution of the Jewish question in Europe” 80 years ago today. This was their brainstorming session to enact what they called ‘The Final Solution’ – the Holocaust. Afterward, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy calls in to explain how in only one year Democrat policies have destroyed so much; 13 new Gold Star Families from the reckless Afghanistan surrender, train robberies, and other crimes have made a comeback, aggression from Russia is renewed, and inflation has hit a 40 year high. McCarthy added that the only time Speaker Pelosi didn’t allow Republicans to choose members to be on her January 6th select committee. Pelosi is not being questioned by the committee because she rejected offers for additional security and now, they want to punish their political adversaries.
THIS IS FROM:
The Federalist
Biden’s Attack On Voting Rights Far Surpasses Trump’s Election Claims
The Hill
80 years later, the world remembers to forget Holocaust origins
Just The News
Reps. Tlaib, Omar participated in events with groups that called for release of ‘Lady al-Qaeda’
Rumble
Pelosi: House Democrats Represent ‘Greatest Collection of Intellect and Integrity’ Anywhere
AP
Georgia DA asks for special grand jury in election probe
The podcast for this show can be streamed or downloaded from the Audio Rewind page.
Image used with permission of Getty Images / Xinhua News Agency
Rough transcript of Hour 1
Hour 1 Segment 1
I spent part of the day interviewing Peter Schweitzer. And depending on the subject, depending on. What I plan to do on my Sunday show or live in TV, sometimes I’ll interview a guest a little bit earlier, as I did with Peter Schweitzer. I know there is football playoff on Sunday, there was last Sunday, too, we still won the night on cable news. I want to thank everybody. I don’t know what is it about me, Mr. Producer, I get the 6:00 p.m. East Coast time show, the hardest slot in radio in the 9:00 p.m. Sunday slot. Yeah, it’s amazing. 8:00 p.m., excuse me, up against 60 Minutes and football. And we win. On cable, we win, I actually love it. I love it now. So Peter Schweitzer’s book comes out next Tuesday. Now, there are books and books and we’ve had wonderful offers on this program, so I don’t want to suggest otherwise. But his books and this book involves extensive research that he and his group undertake. This is by far his best book. Comes out next Tuesday. By far his best book. And it is frightening what you’re going to learn in this book. And the book is called Red-Handed. American elites get rich helping China win. I know it’s Thursday doesn’t come out till next Tuesday, so I’m not here as a special player. I’m here to tell you. Having read the vast majority of this book, I learned things I never knew, and, you know, I’m on top of these facts that the media in America will never investigate, will never cover, because they’re part of it. But you will be shocked to learn shocked, even though at this point you’re probably thinking to yourselves, nothing will shock me anymore. You will be shocked to learn the extent to which big tech Silicon Valley is in the back pocket of, gee, not just China, but Jean. And how they slobber all over the him and that regime as if this is some kind of a religious cult. Absolutely incredible. You’re going to learn the extent to which Nancy Pelosi, her husband. John Boehner, these are two speakers, one a former speaker, this speaker. Feinstein and others. Are up in the air and the grill. Actually, in communist China. The kind of money that they earn. You’re going to learn far more than that. You’re going to learn the extent to which the corporatists in America. Are compliant with this regime, you’re going to learn about the Bush and Trudeau dynasty’s. With our focus on Bush. And how they’ve profited and you’re going to learn things about. The Bidens that she didn’t know. Upwards of 31 million dollars. Transferred to the Biden family in one way or another to one or another, unbelievable, and it goes on and on. And it is a book that flows, it’s really very, very important. It’s very important. That people read this book. This isn’t by my publisher I’m trying to see here, I don’t remember the publisher, actually. Harper, Publishers, Harper. My publisher, Simon and Schuster, and people can say what they will, but Simon and Schuster has been a superb publisher for me and other conservatives, despite some of the controversies. So I’m really hyped up about this because I’m not going to. Take the the luster, take the attention away from Peter. I hope you’ll watch the Sunday show, 8pm Life, Liberty and Levin on Fox. We’ll also have him on the radio program, but it’ll be a full one hour interview is the only guest. And it’s not that Peter has a book. It’s what’s in the book. Because I don’t do a lot of book interviews, I think I’ve told you. I strongly believe that what’s needed. On Fox or other conservative cable channels away in Newsmax. It’s a one hour. Book interviews show with an author. Now, a lot of people oh, that’s boring. There are so many brilliant books and brilliant authors out there. And I think a lot of these companies underestimate the intelligence of their audience. Almost four years ago, it’ll be four years in February. I started Life, Liberty and Levin when I was asked to do a TV show by Fox, but by Suzanne Scott, who’s fabulous, the CEO, Larry. Once a week and on Sunday, obviously, as my show started at 10 p.m., we were number one on the Sunday nights, moved to eight p.m. where no. One on Sunday nights. OK, great. That’s you. That’s not me. But I have a lot of people who come to me with books, some of them are OK. Some of them they don’t write. But some of these authors are absolutely brilliant and fascinating. And I know you would find them so compelling. Absolutely what? The long form interview that I do on my Fox show, I’m just giving you a little backstage stuff. Was fairly popular in the 60s, the 70s, even part of the 80s, and then it stopped. And then the prototypical program is Move Fast, Make the show hot. People don’t want to leave. Move the guests, move the subjects, bom, bom, bom, each segment, different subject. And so when I was asked, I said, no, I don’t want to do that, I want to do a long form interview. And now long form interviews are starting to come back as a result of the success of life, liberty and lovin you folks. Because you want to learn things, you want to understand things. So do I. And many of the people we talked to have nothing to do with politics. So I feel there ought to be a show and maybe I’ll do one one day. I don’t know where, maybe I’ll do one one day where it has as I as I imagine. And I’ll bet you that show will be a ratings blockbuster, too. People are looking for some kind of different way to listen to information, a different way to communicate with each other. I don’t need to reinvent the wheel. I know when I was young, young guy, I know when I was a young guy, what caught my attention? And there’s people who yearn for this. Here in Fort. So some day, some way, I will figure that out. So a lot of opportunities on a lot. Wonderful opportunities anyway. This Peter Schweitzer book Redhanded How American Elites Get Rich Helping China When You’ll Learn very quickly. By the framers of the Constitution were such geniuses, why they rejected the idea. Of a centralized government, why they insisted on separation of powers where they rejected the idea of a unicameral Congress, but they have a bicameral Congress. Why they laid out specific responsibilities for each branch. By the federal government that the that the states created were offset by the sovereignty of the states reasserted and underscored by the 10th Amendment. And why the focus of the Bill of Rights and the focus of our government was on individual liberty. Because the more autocratic and centralized our government becomes. The more these individuals. Sell out the country. For their own power and their own desires, they’re very comfortable with dealing with fascists and Marxists and genocidal maniacs to run other countries. The NBA has no problem with it. Hollywood has no problem with it. As you’ll find out, a number of politicians have no problem with it. A number of media types have no problem with it, period. The more decentralized it is. The more unlikely it is that this sort of thing occurs. So there’s this constant pressure. By those who benefit from centralized government, whether in Washington, those who accumulate power themselves or those who benefit from it by receiving the the benefits of the blood, sweat and tears of other citizens. That they did not earn. I’ll be right back.
Hour 1 Segment 2
Margaret Cleveland over at the Federal House was an excellent thinker and writer, she points out that Biden’s attack on voting rights far surpasses Trump’s election claims. Democrats and the leftist media continue to champion their House. A sham investigation into January six with news breaking just yesterday that the illegally constituted committee had subpoenaed Rudy Giuliani, Jenny Ellis and others at least January six. Truthers generally believed that election related rhetoric caused the Capitol riots and represent a real threat to our republic. They would turn their attention to the current White House and to their grand papa in one week alone. Biden eclipsed everything Trump and his supporters said about the validity of the 2020 election by framing his false claims of voter suppression and subversion. As Jim Crow 2.0, our commander in chief has guaranteed a divided America, the only remaining question is whether he is also guaranteed a violent America. Now, we’ve touched on this, too, and not just Biden, Schumer, the Democrat Party and the media. Have planted the seeds of violence after the 20, 22 and 24 elections, particularly the latter. And they’ve told the nation that Donald Trump is not not to be a nominee. These are the real Bolsheviks. That’s right, I said it yesterday, President Joe the Uniter, Biden proclaimed on Twitter that Jim Crow 2.0 is about to insidious things, voter suppression and election subversion. It’s about making it harder to vote. Who gets to count the vote and whether your vote counts at all? Quote unquote. And what is Jim Crow 2.0? State Election Integrity laws and a. And every year, nearly every state which Biden and his fellow Democrats want to gut with the passage of the so-called Freedom of the Vote Act, which Biden promoted in the same tweet and a week earlier, Biden’s race baiting rhetoric went further when he went to Atlanta, Georgia, to rally support for passage of two federal bills while they’re after recounting the horror of four young black girls murdered at Birmingham Church and speaking solemnly of the beatings of the innocent crossing the bridge at Selma, our president Segway to quote, the right to vote and have the vote counted, unquote. It is democracy’s threshold liberty, Biden intoned before proclaiming that the votes of nearly five million Georgians will be up for grabs if the law holds, referring to Georgia’s Election Integrity Act of twenty twenty one. Biden’s attack continued with him, stressing it’s not just here in Georgia, last year alone, 19 states not only proposed, but enacted 34 laws attacking voting rights. Their end game, Biden said, to turn the will of the voters into a mere suggestion, something states can respect or ignore. Then came the line he repeated in yesterday’s tweet, quote, Jim Crow 2.0 is about to insidious things, voter suppression and election subversion. It’s no longer about who gets the vote. It’s about making it harder to vote. It’s about who gets to count the vote and whether your count, your vote counts at all. This is so poisonous, folks. After assuring his audience his words were fact and not hyperbole, Biden continued, quote, Look, this matters to all of us. The goal of the former president and his allies is to disenfranchise anyone who votes against them. Simple as that. The facts won’t matter, your vote won’t matter. They’ll just decide what they want and then do it. That’s the kind of power you see in totalitarian states, not in democracies. As he ended his speech, he encouraged passage of the bills, even though that meant discarding the filibuster. And in doing so, he declared opponents of the legislation, quote, domestic enemies, unquote, and supporters of voter suppression and election subversion with a clear target that suppression, according to Biden, being black Americans. But Biden just told the country in the world is this, that when Democrats lose in November 2022 or suffer defeat in the presidential election in 2024, it will be because of voter suppression and election subversion. It will be because black Americans were denied the right to vote. Biden’s preemptory challenge to the election results far surpass anything Trump said or did. At least Trump made it about him claiming the election was stolen from him. Biden cast the die about democracy, domestic enemies and race, all while declaring his words fact and not hyperbole. May God save our country if the people actually believe him. Let me be clear, so the Munchkins at Media Matters and the and the perverts over there at media, I can understand something. Mental perverts, of course. What do they think I meant? If there is violence, it’s on their hands. I know of no responsible conservative talk show host who preaches violence on the airwaves, and yet Joe Biden has just preached violence. When you’re telling people that they are denied the right to vote because of their race, when you’re telling people the Republican Party is the party of the enemy, it’s the party of Jim Crow, and they’re trying to prevent you to vote because of your race, when you’re telling people that if you lose, it’s because the Republican Party chose not to count the votes. You are lighting fuses all over the place. You are lighting fuses all over the place. And the Democrat Party is very good at this. That’s why it exists to light fuses. Meanwhile, they blame everybody else.
Hour 1 Segment 3
We’re supposed to remember January six as this great a grave event when the Democrats want this enshrined in the minds of every school aged child. As the day after our government almost fell, our government almost fell on January six, that’s a joke. Eighty years ago today. I wonder how many schools thought this. What happened 80 years ago today? I wonder if LeBron James is familiar with what happened 80 years ago today, Autolib Omar Ariyoshi. For that matter, and Pelosi and Biden, Harris, even Schumer. How about members of the media? On cable TV, on network TV. Just 80 years ago, that’s not much 80 years ago, how many people, you know, are 80 years old? Probably several. Marvin, Aaron, Abraham, Cooper over the hill. Several years ago, the Simon Wiesenthal Center acquired the most significant document in our history. They write the four page letter was written and signed by virtually unknown German soldier Adolf Hitler. At the behest of the intelligence unit to which he was connected shortly before he was demobilized, after Germany’s defeat in World War One, dated September 16, 1919, six years before the publication of Mein Kampf, Hitler described as hatred of Jews, emphasizing that emotional anti-Semitism I’m quoting, which will always find its expression in the form of programs, wouldn’t solve the problem. Only a legal removal of the rights of the Jew would. Hitler added. The uncompromising removal of the Jews all together could be accomplished only under a government of national strength and never under a government of national impotence. And in the chaotic aftermath of Germany’s defeat, no one could predict that Hitler would amass the power to see his hatred become a formal government policy two decades later. Throughout the 1930s, Hitler mesmerized millions of Germans with the fervor of his promise to make Germany and unmatched power, the power of this had bolstered by new propaganda techniques and backed by murder and mayhem unleashed against anyone who opposed him at the masses of the world’s most civilized society were prepared to march their nation straight into World War Two in 1939. The Führer, as he would become known. However powerful, could not fulfill his privacy from hell against the Jews alone. As Hitler had written two decades earlier, his vision of a Jew free world could not be achieved by emotional pogroms or even the mass execution of hundreds of thousands of Jews by special killing squads and newly captured Soviet territories. Too messy, too traumatic to keep shooting women and children at such close range. All that would change at a secret meeting on the shores of a beautiful lake. Wannsee, just outside of Berlin, was originally slated for December nine because of Pearl Harbor. Hitler declared war on the United States right after the Wannsee conference was rescheduled for January 20, 1942, 80 years ago. Reinhard Heydrich, deputy SS chief and head of the Reich Security Main Office, summon the state secretaries of Germany’s most important ministries to coordinate their participation in achieving the final solution to the Jewish problem. Better methods had to be implemented. The participants around the table 80 years ago were no ordinary thugs, most had attended Germany’s most respected schools and universities. Eight of the 15 invited invitees held doctorates. And while they knew that Jews were being murdered in mass and occupied USSR, Heidrick left little doubt that Hitler had ordered a final solution to the Jewish problem, meaning all of Europe’s Jews were to be annihilated. Heidrick sought to involve Germany’s government ministries to help achieve that goal. Now, you’d expected opposition from some attendees, but according to Holocaust organizer Adolf Eichmann, who was present, Heidrick found an unexpected error of agreement. Rather than expressing concerns or outright opposition, the PhDs in attendance expressed enthusiasm about being included in the plan at his trial in Jerusalem many years later. Eichmann testified these gentlemen were sitting together and minced no words about it. They spoke about methods of killing the Jews, about murder, liquidation, about extermination, gassing drew. Jews drew particular interest. The importance they want to see conference 80 years ago cannot be overstated. It mark the point at which Hitler’s plans for genocide were shared with Germany’s major ministries. It also demonstrated the need for the participation of those bureaucracies to accomplish genocide. And just as important, the summary typed at the end of the conference, the Want to see protocol is the only document in history codifying genocide as official state policy. The Wannsee conference took fewer than 90 minutes to devise a plan to wipe out an entire population in Europe. It took place not in some backward country, but in one of the world’s most technologically and scientifically advanced societies. Eighty years later, the world must not ignore the Wannsee legacy. Everyone should read and ponder the Wannsee protocol, never again should anyone confuse being educated with having morals. Some of Germany’s most educated enthusiastically followed Hitler and educated people today still fought strategies to legitimize crimes in the name of greater good. Never again should leaders of democracies turn a blind eye to the evils unleashed against innocents by governments such as communist China, Iran’s Mallak mullah actressy with the hope that somehow playing pussyfoot with tyrants will change the course of history. That didn’t work for Neville Chamberlain, and it won’t work now. Finally, in the Middle East, we cannot expect Israel, the Gulf states and Egypt to accept a new Iran nuclear deal, a nuclearized ayatollah would mean a possible nuclear holocaust. The Jews, again, the principal target, we’ve learned the hard way that words have consequences and we must take tyrants at their word, if the leaders of the United States, United Kingdom and other democracies would pause to study, the Wannsee protocol might save the world from another Holocaust. Rabbi Marvin Hier is founder and CEO of the Simon Wiesenthal Center. Rabbi Abraham Cooper is the center’s associate dean and global social action director. And you should take a look at this Wannsee protocol, January 20, 1942. The detailer provides. Proximally 11 million Jews were to be involved in the final solution of the YAWP Jewish question. They broke down the numbers by country. How they would handle the problem. How the would be proper guidance? What about people of mixed blood? Well, it depends mis mixed blood on the first degree or the second degree or the degrees. It would depend. What are the children of mixed blood? It would depend, they do, to go to that line or the other line. What about non Jews who marry Jews? How are they to be treated? What about sterilization and abortion? What about all of it? How are they to be dealt with? In 90 minutes, they made those determinations. The final solution 80 years ago today hatched. The Wannsee protocol. We ever talked about this, Mr. Producer. No, Mr. Call Screener, you ever thought about this? The final solution, the Holocaust. And nobody’s talked about this in our public schools today. One of the great websites is the Avalon Project. I use it all the time, I mention it in liberty and tyranny as a resource. Have original documents to look at on the on their website. For American history, for world history, ancient history. Medieval history, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21st century. It’s a fantastic site. But all the propaganda and so forth and so on. It makes you wonder when you think of modern times, groups like Black Lives Matter, anti-Semitic groups. Does it not? Being supported. By hosts at ESPN. By its corporate masters, Disney. By the teams, they cover, the NBA, the NFL, by mayors who write BLM and Black Lives Matter in their streets. In the original mission statement, not only are they Marxists. But there antisemite. Makes you wonder about critical race theory being pushed by the left, including people in the media, in the media being pushed by the NEA and the AFT and superintendents all over the country. Critical race theory is an anti-Semitic, racist, Marxist ideology. Things can happen in industrialized society, in advanced societies. Things can happen. The communist revolution in Russia was not led by a peasant. A janitor. Led by a college graduate. Lenin. The communist revolution in China was not led by a peasant. Janitor. It was led by an educated man who studied Marx. While he was working at a library. Mao Tse tung. The communist revolution in Cuba was led by a peasant or janitor led by a lawyer. By the name of Fidel Castro. These Marxist movements. And in many cases, these fascistic movements are led by highly educated people. Look at Italy. Mussolini was a journalist. A journalist. Antifascist. Marx was a journalist. Well, four American papers for over 12 years. And obviously, the Marxist. I just thought I’d pointed out 80 years ago today the final solution was hatched in 1942. I’ll be right back.
Hour 1 Segment 4
And I give you just a taste of a very small morsel of history. And then you read something like this from just the news and nowhere else, Representatives Talib and Omar participated in events with groups that called for the release of Lady al-Qaida. The gunman who took hostages inside a Texas synagogue demanded the release of Aafia Siddiqui, convicted in 2010 of attempting to murder Americans. Rasheeda Taleb in Elián Omar participating in events with Muslim American advocacy groups that have called for her release from a Texas prison. The gunman who took hostages in a Texas synagogue on Tuesday demanded the release of Siddiqui, who’s been referred to in the counterterrorism world as Lady al-Qaeda, and she was convicted in 2010 of attempting to murder U.S. citizens in 2008. She was detained by Afghan authorities who found a number of items in her possession, including handwritten notes that referred to a mass casualty attack and that listed various locations in the United States, including Plum Island, the Empire State Building, the Statue of Liberty, Wall Street, the Brooklyn Bridge, said an FBI press release of her conviction. According to Foreign Policy magazine, the Taliban offered to trade captive U.S. Army deserter Bowe Bergdahl. For the past, ISIS has offered to trade prisoners exchange for Siddiqui. And according to NBC News, there have been long reports that she married the nephew of 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. But those haven’t been confirmed. In November 2021, the Council on American Islamic Relations and American Muslims for Palestine held a free doctor of fear. Washington, D.C., advocacy day to press Congress for the release of the convicted terrorist care, which is an important part of the Democrat Party. Just so you know, in April of last year, Talibe joined us, Asama Harborside, executive director of the AMP and other advocates for a discussion about Palestinian rights. Just the news reached at the Taliban office and asked that the congresswoman supports the effort by AMPE to free Sidiki. Taliban office did not respond before publication. I know the word no is tough. Karen in Minnesota, Democratic Representative Elian Omar in December as American Muslim public servant of twenty twenty one. Now, I understand she hates the country and is an anti-Semite, and Care honors her at the organization’s virtual gala, O’Mara’s office did not respond when asked if the congresswoman supports Kerry’s effort to free Sidiki. Yes, that word no is a tough one. Leeb and Omar. Two members of Congress. Two members of Congress who hate their country hate the Jews. It’s just unbelievable, as does this group care. Which is a key part, as I say, of the Democrat Party, infrastructure, infrastructure, human infrastructure. And, of course, no criticism except from me. Not from The New York Times, not from The Washington Post, no, not from Media Matters, the source front group, not from media. I know from me. Mr. Controversy, Mr. Right Winger. All right, folks, I shall return. and poverty. I shall return