On Thursday’s Mark Levin Show, tens of thousands of migrant children continue to be placed in tents due to overfilled detention facilities. President Biden just keeps moving them to disguise the anarchy at the Southern border. Professors and scholars with a voice in Biden’s administration are driving Marxist policies and ideas like internal colonialism. They claim that Americans and their leaders ignore history and are illegitimate because it’s the migrants that are true inhabitants of this land, not citizens. This current illegal immigration surge is a push to change the US demographic to match the left’s current Critical Race Theory propaganda.” Then, Mara Gay from the NY Times Editorial Board spouts off that the GOP is only “animated” by Trumpism and “xenophobia.” Gay neglected to address the inflammatory propaganda that her paper has published. Later, Democrats have created a schism that takes away jobs from American workers (including union workers), massive tax increases, and Americanized Marxism, and it’s called the American Jobs Plan.
THIS IS FROM:
Fox News
Ron Klain, Biden’s powerful chief of staff, leads White House rife with dark money ties
NY Post
Biden’s ‘infrastructure’ plan is really a massive push to unionize the US workforce
The Blaze
Vaccine stocks nosedive after Biden administration makes global vow
The podcast for this show can be streamed or downloaded from the Audio Rewind page.
Image used with permission of Getty Images / Benjamin Lowy
Rough transcript of Hour 1
Hour 1 Segment 1
By the way, I know it’s Thursday, but I meant to thank you. Last Sunday on Life, Liberty and Lovin. We were number one on the whole day, and that’s thanks to you as well as night. So thank you. Now, as usual, there’s a lot to get to, but I don’t believe in rushing through things in order to do a checklist. What’s going on on the border right now is unprecedented. We could have two million people cross that border in one year. We haven’t seen that. And I don’t know how long, if ever, you realize tens of thousands of children. Are now being placed in tents in whatever is available, and the Democrat congressman on the border there quite far has said that the Bush administration is simply moving these kids from one location to another. There’s absolute anarchy and chaos going on on the southern border. That’s our border. Tens of thousands of more people are headed there. We haven’t even gotten into summer yet, which is the peak. We have MS 13 pouring over the border, we have drugs pouring over the border, we have all kinds of criminals pouring over the border. Women are being raped before they even get to the border, 30 percent is the estimate. Children are being molested. Kamala Harris hasn’t even gone to the border, Joe Biden hasn’t gone to the border. What’s going on? Well, folks, they’re taking their direction is Biden in the Democrat Party from these radicals? And to understand this, we need to understand more than is being reported. And more than you’re being told. And I want to address this for the next 10 or 15 minutes. So you’ll know more than most. And yes, this comes out of American Marxism, but it’s very, very important. There are professors, there are so-called scholars, there are activists who write about what they’re doing, who write about what they think. Those individuals have a voice in the Biden administration, those individuals. Our driving policy in the Biden administration, as well as in the Democrat Party. I’ll give you one example, there’s a book called Navigating Borders Critical Race Theory, Research and Counter History of Undocumented Americans. It’s written by a professor from the university was Zoner Ricardo Castro Salazar and a British Durham University professor, Carl Bagley. Now, what are they saying? First. They say scholars have repeatedly pointed out that the Americans and their leaders tend to be chronic ignores of history. What are they talking about? They are arguing that the United States is really an illegitimate country. That this continent, North America and this continent, South America, the Americas. Are the legitimate territory. Of the people who we call illegal aliens coming into what we call the United States. They call you American Anglo Protestants. United Stations. United Station. You’re an American, Anglo, Protestant, and you are the illegal alien. In the territory that we call the United States. This is what’s being preached, this is what’s being said, so that’s why the Biden administration has banned the use of the phrase illegal alien. Even the word deportation. It is this mentality that exists in this administration. It is a radical, reckless mentality. It is unhinged. And it does not recognize American sovereignty, that is United States sovereignty, because it doesn’t recognize the United States and we are the illegal aliens you see under this thinking and under this model. And Thierry. So they apply critical race theory to this discussion. To this discussion. They argue that critical race theory holds that all knowledge is historical and therefore biased and subjective. Their critical theory of society rejected any claim to objective knowledge and focused on uncovering the oppressive mechanisms of society. So illegal aliens are neither illegal nor aliens. They’re actually the victims of what they call internal colonialism, that is. The Concord Group is dominated and controlled through various means, including violence, more subtle attacks and subordinated groups, culture, language, religion and history by home by you. Are you the opposition resistance to assimilation into the American culture? That culture of the Anglo Protestant identity. Is righteous. So in other words, there can be no assimilation. Into the culture of the United States, because the culture of the United States. Is fraudulent. Again, this is just another offshoot of critical race theory, which is spawned by Marxism. So. They talk about. Tolerance. Tolerance, they colonized, internalized, especially you American Mexicans are Mexicans, Americans of Mexican descent and others from south of the border, they call you. Colonized, internalized colonialists that you have a colonialist mentality and you have become part of the colonizing majority, your sellouts. You’ve been repressed. Through America’s tolerance, internal colonialism is a form of. Inegalitarian pluralism where different ethnicities and cultures coexist, but ethnic relations traditionally follow an assimilation model. This is them like in the United States. They say it’s also a form of racism where the dominant culture that is white, European Protestant background views the colonized ethnicities and cultures as alien and inferior as in the case of native, African, Asian and Mexican Americans in the US internal colonialism. See, they invent phrases and ideas. Exists in the United States with or without the intention of individuals and could be found in all dimensions of life, internal colonialism contradicts the notion of an integrated and democratic society. The dominant society does not see contradictions which perpetrates there excuse me, which perpetuates their privileges. So, again, it is the white dominant society, the European. Protestant society. That is illegal. And in the Americas, the Americas are bigger than the United States and in the Americas. Illegally. This is the mentality within the Biden administration. I won’t go into this in any more detail. This is just a tiny, tiny little salt and pepper on what this book is about. But this gives you just a little taste of why the borders open. The Democrat Party, of course, wants more voters, I talked about this way back in liberty and tyranny. The backbenchers have finally caught up the changing of the demographics and so forth, and when you look at the various surveys and I do also for this book, you will see. And the Pew Research, among others, actually writes. That the changing of the demographics in America have changed the politics in the states and nationally. To the advantage of the Democrat Party. You know this, you see this, we’re living this, so you have this fusion of a Democrat Party which has now been radicalized, which is led by a lot of these Marxists and their agendas, you can see them and executive orders and so forth. You can see this in the propaganda, the Democrat Party oppressor, oppressed class warfare and so forth, that’s Mark. That’s where that comes from. Nowhere else. But now when it comes to immigration, people haven’t been applying this critical race theory, I told you the other day, they call it Laerte Krit. Or Latina Latino critical theory, they don’t even say Latin X, I guess they need to catch up to the modern day language. There’s much more to say about this, but I have to hold my fire right now that this is the kind of information you’re going to have. In my new book, American Marxism. Now, what good does it do, Mark? It does a tremendous amount of good, we must know exactly what we’re confronting, who were confronting the ideology. We’re dealing with all these sudden movements of a major movement. And then we need at. If we’re flailing around. Like a one armed paper hanger, then all we managed to do is get ourselves dirty with paste. So we need to know exactly what’s going on. Like any operation, whether it’s a medical operation, a political operation, a military operation, you need to know what’s taking place on the field. You need to know what’s taking place in the body. And you’re going to know everything. Those of you who have preordered American Marxism, I want to thank you. The hard cover, the e-book, the audio, what, sixty thousand. I feel we need to get to 100000. Then from there, when the book comes out a million and we will shock Washington, we will shock the media, we will shock all these movements, all these people, all these forces that think you’ve surrendered. Because you’re dispirited, will shock the corporatists. That’s the goal. So we’re going to inform ourselves we’re going to be more informed than ever before, whether it is critical race theory or lack crit theory or critical gender theory or climate change, whatever it is, you’re going to be more informed than any other human being on the planet in terms of the general knowledge of all these areas. We don’t pretend to be professors, although many of us could be many of you could be certainly wouldn’t want to be. And that brings it to a crescendo at the end of the book, what are we going to do about these things? So we have a chance to head over to Amazon or Barnes & Noble. Now’s the time. All right. A lot to cover. I’ll be right back.
Hour 1 Segment 2
There’s a lot that the never Trump Republicans are all coming to the defense of Liz Cheney is that the Democrats are coming to the defense of Liz Cheney, that the left wing media are coming to the defense of Liz Cheney. See, the problem with Liz Cheney is she’s trying to change the Republican Party, not to make it more conservative, not to pull in more constitutional policies and so forth. No, she wants it to look like the Bush Cheney years. That’s not going to happen. The Democrat Party cannot survive. Excuse me. The Republican Party cannot survive under those circumstances. It simply cannot. Whether it survives at all is another issue, but it cannot survive under those circumstances. So Linda Chavez. Who has become a disgrace? She was on CNN today, Christie Todd Whitman, who’s really always been a disgrace. She was on CNN today trashing away Amy Klobuchar. Nobody saw it because she was on Seth Meyers. I understand Seth Meyers, never mind so. She was coming to Liz Cheney’s defense and of course, the other day Pelosi came to Liz Cheney’s defense. The only people not coming to Liz Cheney defense are all of us, because if she were allowed to stay and she would keep it up, there’s no way we would take the House of Representatives back. It’s that simple. There was simply no way I’m not going to play you what Linda Chavez had to say because I don’t care. For Christie Todd Whitman, MWS irrelevant because I don’t care. But there’s one I am going to play for you after the bottom of the hour, that is Marcia Gay. Now, who is she? She’s on The New York Times editorial board. And the things she says are disgraceful. Now, I want Margay to understand something as she shoot spitballs all over the place. Conservatives and Republicans, President Trump about xenophobic and racism and culture wars and so forth. You understand something, you jackass, you’re on the editorial board of a newspaper, they cover it up for Adolf Hitler. And the editorial board of a newspaper that tried its very best to censor the Holocaust right up to the last half year so that the American people would be unaware of the Holocaust taking place in the slaughter of European Jews. Understand that, Mara, and you’re proud to be on the editorial board of that newspaper. When I return.
Hour 1 Segment 3
New York Times editorial board includes an individual by the name of Mara Gay and she’s on the morning show this morning. And you can see how how far the morning show has fallen. There’s no bottom to his. Stupidity. And so Margay wants to comment on Liz Cheney now keep something in mind, the media hate the Cheney’s, the media hate the Cheney’s, but now they will use Liz Cheney as they use so many useful idiots. I’m sorry to say that, but it is true. Cut three go. You don’t have a situation in which Republican voters can come together along the lines that Liz Cheney is talking about, on principle, on tax policy, the things that animate Mitch McConnell, they may may work for Mitch McConnell to keep his caucus in order, but that doesn’t apply to animate Republican voters anymore. What animates Republican voters? Listen to this. She doesn’t know you. It doesn’t matter. You’re not animated by substance, you’re not animated by principle, says this clown who writes for the Holocaust denying New York Times. For this clown who writes for a newspaper that was in the back pocket of Joseph Stalin. Go ahead, meet xenophobic, racist in many cases, but also just the culture war debates that Donald Trump has deployed. So what he’s saying is what animates Republican voters are the red meat, xenophobic, racist in many cases, but also just the culture war debates that Donald Trump has deployed over the past four years. I want you to hear this, because these are very, very stupid people who are on the editorial board of The New York Times, they have no standards anymore. When people say, hey, do you know what The New York Times editorial this said it, who cares? You have low IQ buffoons like Margay. And that’s why they chose her to be on the editorial board. Low IQ buffoon, so damn predictable. What animates you? Republican voters are the red meat, xenophobic, racist in many cases, but also just the culture war debates that Donald Trump has deployed over the past four years. Now, ladies and gentlemen, Donald Trump didn’t deploy anything, everything we’ve been talking about. Whether it’s race or gender. Immigration. The degrowth movement and on and on and on, Donald Trump didn’t deploy those those are being deployed against the people. We, the people. And this is a a detestable newspaper from beginning to end. I talk about it’s denial of the Holocaust. I talk about covering up the slaughter of Ukrainians by Joseph Stalin. How about Cuba? When its key reporter. Kept reporting to the American people lies about Fidel Castro. And that newspapers supported the communist revolution in Cuba. And after it was clear that Castro was a communist and he was slaughtering people, they still supported him. That newspapers supported the communist revolution in Nicaragua. And it’s soft pedal what was going on with Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. It supports the Palestinian terrorists in the Middle East. The New York Times. And this for. Goes on the show of another for. And attacks you personally. Did you know your xenophobic and your racist? She’s just another hack for the Democrat Party. That’s all she is. But I want you to hear this go ahead for years and the GOP was happy in all quarters to jump on that bandwagon on the Trump train when it was working for them, they allowed themselves to create this monster. They participated in it. They benefited. It benefited. Donald Trump is a monster. The Islama Nazi who runs Iran, they don’t call him a monster, the genocidal maniac who runs communist China, they don’t call him a monster. They recalled Ted Kennedy, a monster despite Chappaquiddick. We can go on and on down the list. They created this monster, meaning President Trump can the New York Times editorial board, ladies and gentlemen. Go ahead. And now that they lost the election, the question is, Will, where do you go? Well, the problem is these voters are not animated on these traditional Republican issues. They’re animated that red meat Disney folks are not animated. About the spending that’s going on, about these traditional Republican issues, of course, what she fails to say is you’re under attack, your country is under attack with every radical kook, unhinged idea imaginable. What she fails to say is you’re very upset by the effort of the Democrats who are planning to destroy the independence of the Supreme Court, that you’re very upset about the failure to enforce existing immigration law on the southern border, that you’re concerned about what’s taking place there, including the human. Tragedies and so forth. Mara Gay, Mr. Producer, I want you to invite Mara Gay on the program or tell Ritchie, OK. And we’re quite serious. I want to know if this editorial board member. Is prepared to come on my program and debate me. And I wanted to be able to defend The New York Times. See, here’s the thing, The New York Times is helping to destroy our country with the 1619 project, which is a disgusting lie about the founding of this country. But I don’t have to go back to 1619. I can go back to nineteen thirty three. I can go back to nineteen thirty nine, I can go back to nineteen forty one and forty two and forty three, I can go back. That’s not that long ago to talk about the history of The New York Times. Or I can go back to nineteen thirty two again to talk about the history of the New York Times. Or how about we go to 1959, talk about the history of Cuba. I can do this with The New York Times. We’re not talking about five hundred years ago. 400 years ago. I’m talking about around the corner in the past. The paper record all the news that’s fit to print. Their hate for Donald Trump. I guess they sold a few newspapers as a result. Some are gay, I would like to talk to you on the air. I would like to debate you. You’re talking to two mannequins when you’re talking to the the Scarborough’s Sacco and Vanzetti, their. You should come on a show where you’re going to be challenged and I’m happy to be challenged by you and let’s talk about xenophobia and let’s talk about racism and let’s talk about red meat. Because I’ve got plenty to discuss about you in The New York Times and how you conduct yourselves and how you’re xenophobic and how you’re racist and how you use red meat left and right. Even though you’re probably vegan’s. Now, let’s talk about your great Joe Biden. And you’re a great Democrat party. Red meat, she says she listen to AOC, Autolib or Omar are Pressley or Baqer talk about red meat. She listened to Schumer and Pelosi. Talk about red meat. She listen to Biden, Mr. Jim Crow himself. Nosegay, let us. Have a debate. Just the two of us. That’s more than your newspaper, whatever offered me. I’ve written, ironically, one New York Times best seller after another in the last six have been number one, of course they haven’t done a review. If they ever did, they would trash it. But how about a debate? Any member of your editorial board, let’s do the any three members of your editorial board against Little Omak, just a radio host, how bright can I be? And I will play your audio. From your appearance on the morning show and Mrs. Shmo, a.k.a. Sacco and Vanzetti show. And let’s go through this point by point, because you’re not going to be challenged. By to quote the late, great Joe Biden, a Neanderthal like like Scarbro. That’s right. As a boy sat on that bridge in Deliverance. Looks exactly like him, doesn’t he? Except the difference is he doesn’t know how to play a banjo. The inbred on the bridge, he knew how to play a banjo. So he’s got one up on Joe. Mara Gay, this challenge is open, it’s public. You up for it or not? I’ll be right back.
Hour 1 Segment 4
Paraguay is not alone. There is Jeremy, Peter, we’d love to debate him. There’s Philip Washington Post. I can go down a long list of these people. A long list. We’ll try to get her on the show and reading reviews she’s considered very incisive, has a wonderful presentation on MSNBC. Well, I’ll bet. Let’s give it a try. Mara, what do you think? May I call you Mara? I have a very good friend, very good friend, serves in the House of Representatives. He was my friend before he served in the House of Representatives. I’m not at liberty to say who it is and some conservatives in the House are. Not pleased with Elise Stefanik, they say she’s not conservative enough to be the number three Republican in the House and they keep sending me this information of how she voted on this side and the other. And I have dear friends and conservative media, one or two of which have written about this. So they’re circulating the information among themselves, which is fine. I must confess, I don’t know a lot about Elise Stefanik voting record. But I said to my friend, OK, so who are the conservatives putting up for the third spot? Nobody. Nobody yet. I said, why not? I mean, it’s a matter of choices, right? Who are you putting about nobody yet. Why, because President Trump’s back there and Kevin McCarthy is backing her and Steve Scalise is backing her. So I don’t know what I’m supposed to do with this information. Honest to God. My supposed to go out and trash the woman who, by the way, was outstanding all through these various impeachment attacks. And I understand. Liz Cheney has to go, he says, I agree with you, so, OK, well, who’s your guy or gal? Nobody. OK, well, I’m not going to go out there and trash this woman. Because the conservatives in the House. Are providing information to people, but don’t have the gonads to propose somebody. You can’t fight a battle with nobody. So that’s the bottom line, I don’t get it. And we’re going to win the whole time and complain all the time, you think you have somebody better go ahead, let’s go. Now, we’ve had very good dealings, were they here on the radio that has nothing to do with her voting record. But the goal here, let me let me put it to you this way. One of the things I want to make clear and I put in the book is if we don’t put aside some of our differences and unite against this Marxist movement. We’re done, it’s over. We’re finished. The second temple. The second temple in Jerusalem. Some of you been to Jerusalem. And you see, the Western Wall used to be called the Wailing Wall and the Temple Mount, which grievously is in the hands of the terrorists. While the Romans were assaulting that temple. For around four years. And the Jews, badly outnumbered, badly outgunned, put up a heroic fight. And they were slaughtered. As a matter of fact. It was explained to me when I was over there that they ran out of trees. Within miles of the temple because of all the people they were nailing to crosses. Then they started to reuse the crosses. Some 100000 Jews. And there were more than that who were slaughtered. And yet, while the Romans were attacking the various factions within the walls. We’re fighting with each other. There’s historical example and historical example demonstrating this. You don’t have to go to Jerusalem, you can go to other parts of the world. You go to the Russian, Russian the Russian Revolution, go to China and the communist Chinese revolution, go to Cuba and the Cuban revolution, Venezuela, the Venezuelan rebels, all these movements. They’re not supported by a majority. But they take advantage of cleavages, of gaps, of disagreements, of internal battle. If we don’t put some of our disputes aside. And align ourselves, I’m not talking about aligning ourselves with people who do not recognize the threat to this country, I’m not talking about aligning ourselves with people who would undermine our ability to galvanize. I’m talking about if we don’t put some of our second and third tier things aside and get together and battle this American Marxist movement, we are going to lose. We are going to lose. In fact, I will put it to you this way, we’re losing right now. We are losing right now. So we cannot conduct ourselves as we did six months ago, 12 months ago, three years ago. I get the back biting, I get it all, but I’m at a different place. That’s not where my head is. My head is that we have to defeat this enemy. We have to defeat this enemy, American, Marxist. That’s the enemy. I’ll be right back.