On Friday’s Mark Levin Show, how can you have bipartisanship with the Democrats when they are taking steps to destroy our culture, our economic system and separation of powers? President Biden and the Democrats aren’t interested in bipartisanship, which is why they need to be politically defeated. Then, it turns out that the reporting from the New York Times that Russia was offering bounties on American soldiers during the Trump Administration was a fake story. A lie to smear Trump who is an affectionate supporter of the US Military. Will the New York Times apologize for their false reporting? Despite the New York Times and the Washington Post being owned by Jewish families they largely ignored the Holocaust. Sadly, this is the gold standard of the left-wing in America. Later, Biden is making it possible for the Islamo-Nazi regime in Iran to obtain nuclear ICBM’s that can reach America. Afterward, The Democrat party is systemically racist and they despise the founding of America. Did Jim Crow Joe take his oath on a racist document? Finally, David Horowitz calls in to discuss the oppression of the Democrat Party as described in his new book “The Enemy Within: How a Totalitarian Movement is Destroying America.”
THIS IS FROM:
Just The News
Latest New York Times story to crumble follows long history of journalism failures
Twitter
A look back on how cable news went all in on the discredited Russian bounties story.
Jerusalem Post
US pressuring Israel to stop commenting on Iran – report
Right Scoop
Black man stands up to Antifa/BLM agitators in Brooklyn Center, tells them “Don’t you dare start this s***”!
The podcast for this show can be streamed or downloaded from the Audio Rewind page.
Image used with permission of Getty Images / Brendan Hoffman
Rough transcript of Hour 1
Hour 1 Segment 1
George Bush, George W. Bush wrote a piece pushing bipartisan immigration reform. I’ve got to tell you folks something. And I’m serious about this. George Bush and the rest, they have no idea what we’re up against. Do they not understand what Joe Biden is doing on the border? They want to talk about bipartisan immigration reform. How do you bipartisan anything? They’re attacking the fundamental laws in this country. They are taking steps to destroy our culture. In our economic system. They want to destroy separation of powers and the independence of the court, which they are daily threatening, and he’s talking about we need bipartisan immigration reform. Has he talked to Kevin McCarthy? Kevin McCarthy was on the show the other day and he said Joe Biden hasn’t talked to him since he’s been inaugurated, that he’s reached out to the president and he hasn’t reached back. They just sent him letters that he’s made phone calls, nothing, nothing. So we have this this sort of virtue signalling this preening by George W. Bush about we need bipartisan immigration reform. And exactly how do you get there? Joe Biden is not interested in any of this. You have the bumbling boozer Bohner. Who’s out there saying, I get along? I’ve got a I got along with George W. Bush while he’s trashing conservatives left and right. He’s such a buffoon. He’s known Biden for decades. Biden will work a deal, Biden doesn’t even talk to the Republicans. Is a week or two ago where McConnell said that Biden hadn’t talked to him. And so he brings window dressing in some of these rhinos to sit in the Oval Office. They’ll sit there an hour, hour, 20 minutes and tell jokes to go to the restroom. Then they’re cordially dismissed. And he’s mocking them, he’s laughing at them, he’s going around them. So I don’t I don’t understand this bipartisan immigration reform, what other bipartisan reforms should we have? Is George W. Bush concern? That Joe Biden has helped keep our schools sheltered because of the teachers union. I mean, the unreality is unbelievable to me. We have to defeat Joe Biden, we have to defeat the Democrats, we got to get our country back. Does he not notice the riots in the streets? I thought all those were supposed to end when Donald Trump left office. Well, they haven’t ended. Have you noticed the full throated attacks by the Democrats against the riders? Well, if you have, I haven’t. Certainly not. It’s really quite unbelievable. It’s like some of these Republicans living in a completely different world. They want to be seen, of course, as. Well, as what they want to be seen, of course, is as bipartisan and so forth. Now, there’s a couple other things here. I want to talk about The New York Times in the media. Because the hatchet job that was done on Trump and you and the American people throughout the election is just appalling, you know. When the story first came out from The New York Times. Alleging that. President Trump was aware that Putin and the Russians put bounties on the heads of American troops and Trump didn’t do anything about it and didn’t even condemn it. That that sound right to any of you, did that sound accurate to any of you? Of course not. That makes sense to any of you. Of course not. Donald Trump loves his country. He loves the American military. The idea that he would be aware that Putin has put bounties on the heads of American soldiers in Afghanistan was always preposterous. If these things sound preposterous, they are preposterous. But The New York Times pushed it. The media, the rest of the media pushed it, and then the Democrats pushed it, including Joe Biden. All summer. They couldn’t stop. I was saying here, wait a minute, we’ve gotten some information. From some in intelligence. That this is not accurate. The president of the United States, Donald Trump, said it’s not accurate. It’s not the intelligence that I have. It didn’t matter. They wanted it to be true and they wanted to use it. For their campaign and politically. It was a lie. The Biden. Intelligence agency said it was based on very weak intelligence, in other words, it never happened. It never happened. So what will The New York Times do now? It’ll do absolutely nothing. It’ll help you forget with all the rest of the static going on, it’s like 60 Minutes and CBS, the outrageous hit job it did on governor dissenters in Florida, that they apologize. No, they didn’t apologize. They didn’t apologize at all. They had some stupid comment given by the woman, the reporter. Who is responsible in part for what took place, but they never apologized, they didn’t issue a correction. So the media are not only. In the back pocket of the left of the Democrat Party, and that’s abundantly obvious. But they’re arrogant about it, they’re brazen about it, and they don’t give a damn what you think about them, you want to know why? Because they have dismissed half the country, all of you. All of you. They’re in business. Not to report. But to advance the cause. To advance the cause of the left in the Democrat Party, that is the base of the corporate media, that is the base of big tech. And so they’re not promoting free speech, they’re not promoting truth, they’re not promoting factual information, they’re promoting their agenda. And it’s almost as if they’re saying, what are you going to do about it? What are you going to do about. He can’t touch us. Now, just the news, John Salomon’s excellent website. He’s talking about latest New York Times story to crumble follows a long history of journalism failures. Ashley Rensburg, author of The Gray Lady, Went How The New York Times misreporting fabrications and Distortions Radically Alter History explains that the cause of the Times decades of misreporting. Decades of misreporting. Now, what’s The New York Times going to do? Are they going to print a retraction or a correction on this hideous story, this lie that they pushed? They’re going to apologize, they’re going to do the kind of reporting that we’ll get as much coverage and profiles the original story, no. No, they won’t. Rensburg says that’s what happened time and again, the big story break, and there’s a lot of hoopla and there’s a lot of coverage and the narrative gets cemented. And when the story turns out to be false or mistaken or what have you, there’s either a very small correction that’s printed at the bottom of the article that very few people will pay attention to or nothing at all. So he said, I think in this case, we’ll see what happens and hopefully the Times will do the right thing. Well, I don’t know. Why he thinks that. You said that from what I learned through years and years of researching this book and diving into these major historical episodes, it was never the case. And it’s still not the case that the Times is able to take responsibility and to act in an accountable way with these areas is exactly right. Now, one of the reports that Times fabricated was on the bombing of Nagasaki, Rensburg, explain the Times reporter William Lawrence had been, quote, a great science reporter, unquote, who was so on top of the story about nuclear physics and the development being made at the time that he was really well ahead of the government in terms of his understanding of what was going on. Then Lawrence was suddenly reporting on vitamin B and studies related to smoking and cancer and really humdrum stuff for the time. And the question was kind of why what happened? He reappears on the scene in one of the bombers on the way to bomb Nagasaki, and he writes this great report, this news report about being on the bombing run, whether he’s actually watching the bomb or drop the bomb on Nagasaki, it was the only reporter to have that kind of access. And he says and, you know, when you think about it, that makes sense, there should be no reporters watching a nuclear bomb being dropped on a civilian population. Now, what turned out to be the case was that he had been hired by the Department of War to lend a hand and euphemism turned to basically give them cover and run with a complete lie, that there was no such thing as radiation sickness, that when they dropped this bomb, it was just a bigger version of conventional bomb. I have a better example. And I’ve mentioned it to you time and again, and I wrote about it and on Freedom of the Press, which is really the book on the press. I did an entire chapter on The New York Times so bad is The New York Times. As I was doing my research, I said, I can’t ignore this. The New York Times is the worst of the worst. It’s worse than all the other media operations combined. I know some of you scratching your heads, but it is and they use it as the gold standard. And that’s the that’s the ironic joke. This corporation, The New York Times, which is in business and makes a fortune or did. And supposedly reporting news. Is relied on. To provide facts. And during the Holocaust. It covered it up. Passing mentions of it in the back pages, very rare. The owner of The New York Times, Sulzberger. He didn’t want to make public what was taking place in Europe. It wasn’t hard to ignore it. Hitler was announcing it. He was proud of it. European newspapers were writing about it. But not The New York Times and by the way, not The Washington Post. Not The New York Times, not The Washington Post, Franklin Roosevelt didn’t want them reporting about it. As well. No, I’m going to tell you something that hurts me deeply into my soul and I mean this in all seriousness. Both of those newspapers. The New York Times in The Washington Post. This really is painful for me to say, very painful. We’re owned by Jewish families. Who are not religious. They were secular Jews. To put their politics before their faith. Who put their politics before their country? Just as so many do today. And as those voices were screaming from those ovens. As those voices were screaming. The New York Times ignored the. Less than 10 years earlier. When Stalin decided to wipe out the peasants in Ukraine. Just as Putin hopes to attack Ukraine now. The New York Times not only ignored it. It took Stalin’s propaganda and put it on the pages of The New York Times. The Walter Durante, the Pulitzer Prize winning New York Times reporter who’d been there in Moscow for 12 years and was on the take. Stalin set them up with a girlfriend, set them up with a car, set them up with the best meals paid in money and so forth. New York Times management knew it. But he was very popular. They cover it up. The slaughter of millions of Ukrainians. By the communists, the Soviets. And I could go on and on. Ladies and gentlemen, this is the gold standard of the Democrat Party. This is the gold standard of the left wing movement in this country. This is the newspaper that’s read in every newsroom in this country before they decide what to focus on each and every day. And they lied about President Trump. And not just lied affirmatively, but by omission. They help cover up the Hunter Biden story. They were among the leading outlets pushing the Russia collusion hoax. And they’re still at it today. I’ll be right back.
Hour 1 Segment 2
The New York Times based that story on, again, anonymous sources and other media outlets, ran with it, some of them even said they had independently verified it. They lie. This takes us back to a subject that we’ve talked about and really that Clarence Thomas brought up originally and one of his dissents, and that is New York Times versus Sullivan. Tommy, ladies and gentlemen, are we better off today because of that decision? But The New York Times runs such stories in order to impact the election, such outrageous stories. And you saw other outrageous stories about Kavanaugh and what happened with him allegedly and on and on and on. We are being inundated with lies, dressed up as news reports. Time to damaged conservatives and Republican candidates, particularly Donald Trump in this case, but you watch the future really being served well as a public, as a relatively free people. Are we being served well now by this media? Know what would have happened if the laws prior to New York Times versus Sullivan have been in place, state defamation and other laws, they would have been sued by Donald Trump. And they would have lost. And they would have paid a price and the reporters might be personally liable and probably even fired today. What happens is it’s a hiccup. They move on to their next target, their next smear, and the American people are utterly disserved by the Holocaust, denying New York Times and the rest of the media. I’ll be right back.
Hour 1 Segment 3
Now, The Daily Caller put together a montage of comments in June and July of last year on cable news and by Democrats on the now discredited Russian bounty story, which was discredited by me at the time, was it not, Mr. Producer? It’s amazing. And I’m not going to force you to go back and dig it up. But we could, but what’s the point? I think Jonathan Toobin understands that, right, Mr. Producer? Anyway, Jeff, no, not him, not Jeffrey Janah. They’re both that one keeps his pants on and one does not. Anyway, I want you to listen to this montage of Jake Tapper. An ABC News reporter, Rachel Maddow, Wolf Blitzer, Brian Stelter, another ABC News reporter, Larry O’Donnell, CBS reporter Chris Cuomo, Joe Scarborough, CNS guest, MSNBC host Brooke Baldwin, Joy Reid, Hillary Clinton, Kamala Harris and so forth. They want to believe. And they want you to believe. That Donald Trump would turn the other cheek on this report. That he was aware and he was informed that Vladimir Putin was paying bounties to kill American soldiers, which turns out to be a flat out lie and just shows you how poisonous and cancerous. The media today, how they’re really helping to. To destroy this country, cutin, go in our world lead today, President Trump dismissing the Russian bounty intelligence story as a hoax meant to damage him and Republicans. The president often touts this. What do you say? What do you say about that, Jake? You use sarcastic jerk, you snide buffoon, you embarrassed by this? Start at the top, Mr. Producer, please go ahead. In our World Lead today, President Trump dismissing the Russian bounty intelligence story as a hoax meant to damage him and Republicans. The president often touts his relationship with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin. That the White House also responding tonight to a bombshell report accusing Russia of offering bounties to the Taliban to kill American soldiers in Afghanistan. And now, you know, from this reporting in The New York Times, which has since been confirmed by The Wall Street Journal, that not only does the president know that Russia was paying for American soldiers deaths, so stop, stop. CNN. Relying on The New York Times, ABC, relying on The New York Times, the detestable Rachel Maddow at MSNBC, saying it was independently verified by The Wall Street Journal, these these media organizations, they just lie. Go ahead, Post is now reporting that the alleged Russian bounties to Taliban fighters in Afghanistan are believed to have resulted in the deaths of U.S. troops. Now let’s stop. So now you have CNN citing The Washington Post. Which says that these bounties the Russians placed on American soldiers. The. The Taliban actually killed American troops. Now we know the story is a lie. So look at all these media organizations, these corporate media types, look at how they conduct themselves, go ahead New York Times story about a stunning us and not a prepubescent girl. That’s Brian Stelter. Go ahead. Finding the Russia secretly ordered offered Afghan militants bounties to kill U.S. troops. So comes under fire over those bombshell reports that the White House was told Russia was paying bounties to kill U.S. troops in Afghanistan. The most important application of that question is, what did the president know about Vladimir Putin offering a bounty for the killing of American soldiers in Afghanistan? And when did he know it? A senior Afghan official confirmed to CBS News that the reports were not only true, but the Russian government achieved some success. Oh, stop now. CBS has independently confirmed the story from a senior Afghan official. So The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post and CBS independently confirmed the story, which was a lie. And The New York Times relied on anonymous sources, which was a lie. Go ahead, very I cannot tell a lie, MacInerney insists the president does, in fact, read a snarky piece of crap this Friday. Cuomo is Mr. Tough Guy picking on women much like his brother, I guess. Go ahead. Everything he needs to read. We need to look at the real threat to U.S. troops and the risk that Russia I’ll put it to you this way. That story was a lie. Trepp never turned away and was never told that. Putin has put a bounty on soldiers heads, but I will say this. Cuomo, Smothers Brothers responsible for the death of innocent American citizens, many of them people’s parents and grandparents in nursing homes, you puke. Go ahead. Bounty on their heads that Americans found out this weekend that Vladimir Putin is paying to put bounties on the heads of American troops, Joe Scarborough is a very stupid and sick man. He’s a very stupid and sick man, you can hear him how stupid he is and how how sick he is. He just can’t help himself. He can’t help himself. Right out of the movie Deliverance, right off the bridge. The inbred on the bridge grew up to be Joe Scarborough. They look alike, you sure he wasn’t a child actor, Mr. Producer? Go ahead. And at the White House was warned about Russia offering bounties, actual bounties to kill U.S. troops in Afghanistan. He’s not even there yet. He’s still suggesting that the reporting about the fact that there were these bounties offered is fake. Meanwhile, your organization, The New York Times and others are getting some fairly detailed how your organization, The New York Times, of course, are denying Holocaust and cover it up about what Stalin was doing in the Ukraine and has been really quite anti-American, anti-Semitic for decades now. Your organization has reported authoritatively, I might add, that, in fact, President Trump did know about all this. Right. Right. Yeah. OK. All right. Go ahead. I would actually works despite those denials over and over, sources tell CNN that last week the US even share that intelligence with British. Wow. Now, CNN has independently confirmed. So that’s NBC. Excuse me. That’s yeah. That’s The Wall Street Journal. CBS, of course, led by The New York Times, CNN. Wow, they all independently confirmed a story that never happened. Go ahead. British troops would have been targeted as well. Yeah, that’s to say nothing of putting bounties on American troops. It’s unbelievable, Joy, public reporting that Russia had bounties on the heads of American soldiers. And you know what a bounty is. This is Kamala Harris. It puts a price on your head and they will pay it if you are killed. And we know that bounty is he she didn’t cackle, I notice, yeah, we know what a bounty is and we know what abusing little kids from south of the border, encouraging the come to the United States is. Also, we know kids getting raped. You seem really concerned about that, as does your idiot boss. Jim Crow, Joe, very, very worried about it, both of you rushed to the border to get information on what’s taking place. Oh, you didn’t. Both of you reversing course on your policy. Oh, you did. Ladies and gentlemen, the media, the left in this, they don’t give a damn about you or fellow human beings or anything. This is all about power. It’s all about pushing a narrative. It’s all about them. Every damn one of these people, when you listen to the way they talk and what they’re about. These are ego maniacal narcissists. There is no reason for Joe Scarborough to be on TV. It’s an area. National pulled somebody out of an insane asylum where a homeless guy off the corner. Give him a shave, cut his hair, take off his raincoat, gametime jacket, that’s Joe Scarborough. That’s Joe Scarborough. And so we have this llI. And I want to hear from Jen Psaki. Cut 11, go out of the Russian downings and see whether President Trump and his senior administration officials have been briefed on the threat. So here you have a reporter. Sucking air through his or her mask. Here you have a reporter sucking air through his or her mask. And wanting to keep pushing the story, OK? OK. I was briefed on it. Well, listen, we know it was false, but was not briefed on it. Now, does that make sense to anybody? President said he hadn’t heard about. Go ahead, comment was done by the intelligence community to look at available intelligence so it wasn’t looked at briefings or who has been briefed, it was looked at available intelligence. A lot of that came from detainees, some of that. And hence we announced it was low to moderate confidence. But it’s really not being done through the prism of politics or the prism of current and past political appointees, but done through the intelligence available and what can be assessed on that basis. Oh, very good. Thank you for clearing all that up. Another hit job on Donald Trump. More lies to the American people. If they’re not covering up for the left, they’re lying about us. Than the people we support. What was done to Donald Trump? His candidacy, his presidency, his 2016 candidacy. What was done to Donald Trump is what fascists and Marxists do to their opponents. It’s what sleazeballs and buffoons do to the American people. All those media outlets, all of them. Lied through their teeth, they didn’t independently verify a damn thing. And they accused our president. Our president and it was day after day, week after week, month after month, they were giddy about it. Of having received intelligence. That the Russians had paid bounties to the Taliban to kill American soldiers. None of it was true. And it didn’t matter. And they move on. Attack the next person. Attack the next conservative. Attacked the next conservative talk show host or Fox host. All right, Governor, like the Santos just attack, attack, attack. The media in this country are contributing to the death of this country. Then they walk around and beat their chests about freedom of the press. There is no press there, propagandists, so the question isn’t freedom of the press anymore, it’s freedom of the propagandists. I’ll be right back.
Hour 1 Segment 4
To quote my man, Marvin, Mr. Producer in the Gem Shopping Network, we are moving and we are grooving. That is I got to move on. There’s a lot to cover here. A friend of mine writes. The Talmud instructs US ethics of our fathers, quote. In a place where there are no ethical and moral men stand up and be a man of moral clarity for all to see by example. There would be men, that would be women, that would be you folks, you are moral men and women who are moral people. Stick with it. Stand up and be counted. We are surrounded by. We are surrounded by moral midgets. Ethical dwarf’s. By that, I don’t mean physical stature, I mean exactly what I’m saying, and that’s what’s taking place in this country. I want to touch on this issue of Iran as we’re moving and grooving. I want to touch on this issue of Iran. And further, discuss it in the next hour. Ladies and gentlemen, during the course of Bill Clinton’s presidency, it was he and his administration that made it possible. For two history changing events to occur, and I’m not talking about the blue dress. No one. Technology flowed to the communist regime in China. To make it possible for them to build and launch intercontinental ballistic missiles with nuclear warheads, little do people remember. That a mere 20 years ago. China could not launch a rocket. They would crash and burn. Within moments. They the take off. But they got the technology from the Clinton administration or I should say surrogates, that its support in Bill Clinton’s campaign. Then there’s North Korea. The Clinton administration’s approach to North Korea made it possible for the North Koreans. To move into the nuclear field, which is exactly what they’ve done. Communist China today, 20 years later. Is considered by our intelligence agencies and our national security agencies and our defense agencies, not only to be the number one threat to the United States of America. But on a peer level with us militarily. Did you hear me? We had eight years of Obama, Biden, they gutted the United States military while the Chinese were on the move, he ran around the world condemning America. Trashing America, apologizing for America. Meanwhile, the Chinese, they saw there their gap, they saw the gap and they ran for it and they see it now with Biden. North Korea, the same thing. Biden, Obama, Clinton made it possible. For both of these communist regimes. To become nuclear powers and here we go again, here we go again with Joe Biden. And his team of reprobates, miscreants and malcontents. Joe Biden is making it possible for the Islama Nazi regime in Tehran that keeps threatening our country. To get ICBM’s. With nuclear warheads. And the Iranians have announced that they’re going to. They’re going to move their program. And they are going to move their program in such a way. As they believe they will shortly have the capacity to make nuclear weapons. And Joe Biden says today when he’s confronted with it, we’re not happy about that. Even though they’re going to be at 60 percent uranium, but we’re pleased they’re willing to talk to us. And so I’m here to predict something quite horrific. Under Joe Biden’s watch, if somebody doesn’t do something to that regime in Iran, the Islama Nazi regime in Iran will have ICBMs with nuclear warheads aimed at American cities.