On Wednesday’s Mark Levin Show, if sworn in, Joe Biden will be an illegitimate president. The states of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, Michigan, and Arizona, all had changes made to their election laws that violated the federal Constitution. These states represent 73 electoral college votes. It’s a travesty that the Supreme Court has abdicated its duty to uphold the Constitution. Then, Biden and the Democrats lied to America and the media helped them do it. The press covered for Hunter Biden but now they’ve been exposed. This election has been exposed by Sen. Ron Johnson, Chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, who brought in a host of witnesses to highlight the importance of election integrity. Later, Peter Schweizer calls in and explains that Joe and Hunter Biden aren’t the only Washington insiders with close ties to China. Sen. Mitch McConnell’s wife’s family owns a transportation company linked to China. Afterward, Rep Eric Swalwell should be expelled from Congress for his close personal interactions with a Chinese government spy. China has conducted multiple influence operations on the United States and Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe reiterates that China interfered in the 2020 US election.
THIS IS FROM:
Real Clear Politics
Dem Sen. Gary Peters: Russia Doesn’t Need Disinformation Anymore, They Simply Promote Trump’s False Statements
Rumble
Sen. Ron Johnson EXPLODES on Democrat Hack at Election Fraud Hearing
Right Scoop
“This is a bizarre, lunatic, totalitarian cult.” – Ted Cruz
Washington Post
Could a refusal to transfer power happen in Canada? There are reasons to worry.
Biz Pac Review
Biden calls gun violence ‘national health crisis’; Harris says ‘past time’ for new gun control
Breitbart
Biden’s DOE Pick Jennifer Granholm Spent Years Pushing Russia Conspiracy Theories
Townhall
Iowa’s Largest Newspaper Calls Out Democrat Over Attempted Election Steal: It’s Time to Concede
The podcast for this show can be streamed or downloaded from the Audio Rewind page.
Image used with permission of Getty Images / Stefani Reynolds
Rough transcript of Hour 1
Hour 1 Segment 1
Well, let me make this as simple as I know how, not for you folks. You’re sophisticated. It’s for the interlocutor’s, the entire Cedar’s, the people listening who want to write their articles. But I’ll make this so simple. Even Mitch McConnell can understand. Even Joe Scarborough can understand. Even Fredo Cuomo can understand. Let’s take five states, Pennsylvania, 20 Electoral College votes. Georgia, 16 Electoral College votes. Michigan, 16 Electoral College votes. Arizona, 11 Electoral College votes. Georgia, 16. I said Georgia, Wisconsin, 10 Electoral College votes. That’s seventy-three Electoral College votes. Every one of these states were targeted by Democrats. Every one of these states violated the United States Constitution. Article two, Section one clause to every one of them. Because changes were made to their election systems, not by the state legislature, but by other public officials, whether a rogue Supreme Court in Pennsylvania, a rogue secretary of state buckling the Tracy Abrams in Georgia. And I go right down the list. That’s 73 Electoral College votes. This is why Donald Trump won the election. We can talk about fraud to a blue in the face. And there was some unbelievable testimony today. And I’m going to spend some time and play it for you because all you hear is the propaganda from people who don’t listen to the testimony, who don’t read the lawsuits, but even more don’t care about the Constitution. I want to remind you about the Democrat Party. Stacey Abrams still hasn’t conceded in her obvious loss for governor in Georgia. You may recall Minnesota, the secretary of state there at the time, they kept counting votes and counting votes till they stole the election from Norm Coleman and gave it to Franken. And I was as I sit here today, there was a Republican upset in a formerly Democrat seat. The Democrat won’t concede, she says, I’m going to take it to the majority in the House where she hopes to have the House vote and it can to seat her and not the Republican. In an upstate seat in New York, a Democrat judge keeps counting ballots in order to try and defeat the Republican who won fair and square. I want to remind you. That after Bush 43 won in 2000. They said he was an illegitimate president. And of course, after Trump won, they said he was illegitimate because of Russia collusion, that Democrats don’t believe in the electoral system, which is why they attack it and they fundamentally alter it. They don’t believe in a peaceful transition of power, they believe in power. And we ought not roll over. I don’t give a damn what Mitch McConnell does or this guy Thune or anybody else, they don’t represent me. I don’t know what kind of people can stay in Washington, D.C. for 50 years, to be honest with you, in these governmental positions, but it takes an odd kind of egomaniacal mentality to do it. So in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan and Arizona, and they’re not the only ones, the Democrats went into these states and change the election systems. In violation of the federal constitution. And if the federal constitution had not been violated, yes, Donald Trump would be elected president of the United States today, putting all fraud aside. All fraud aside. This is why you should be furious with the United States Supreme Court that had as its duty, as its sworn responsibility, every single member. To insist that the states comply with the federal constitution under Article two, Section one, clause two. And that any changes made outside that clause by governors, by secretaries of state, by courts, federal or state. By election boards or other bureaucrats will be deemed unconstitutional. They had a case, a case before a single vote was counted. They had a case. And they didn’t take it up. It’s still sitting there today as I speak. A court that does intervene in state election laws, it just did in the state of Kansas, it just ruled that Kansas cannot require evidence of citizenship to vote. How did they rule? By taking another pass. And allowing a lower court’s decision to impose their rules on the state of Kansas. The framers of the Constitution and the ratifiers and the conventions insisted on having as much control. Over determining the process of elections is possible. And yet, what do we have here? We have federal courts. Interfering endlessly on what states can and cannot do, and then when you go to the Supreme Court and you say, Hey, court. They’re violating Article two, Section one, clause two, I’m not asking you to create anything, I’m not asking you to rewrite a law. I’m not asking you to change the Constitution of the United States. Please do your damn job and uphold the rule of law. They say, oh, that’s political. Actually, they say nothing. They say nothing and they do nothing, absolutely nothing. And if they had upheld the Constitution and keep in mind, this is a Democrat Party. Democrat officials, the Biden campaign, Democrat litigators and in some cases Republicans buckling like the secretary of state of Georgia, but he was responding to lawsuits brought by Stacey Abrahim groups, among others, and he buckled, changed the signature requirement. Donald Trump would be president, the United States, so you want to know why the man’s furious? You know why he doesn’t just roll over? Because seventy-four million of us plus are not going to roll over either. I’ve said that over and over again. We’re not going anywhere. You think the Democrats will put up with this if rule changes were made in violation of the federal Constitution that elected Donald Trump president of the United States, under those rule changes? What do you think they would do today? But they made these changes. They plotted. They planned, they litigated, they pressured, they lobbied. And now we have, if he’s sworn in, Joe Biden, who will be an illegitimate president of the United States in every meaning of that word, illegitimate. That is my view. Anyone who comes on TV and radio and. Goes on and on and on. About what we should do. I’m not talking about what we should do. I’m talking about reality. And you’ll know that many of the people who tell you what you should do. I have never like Trump. In fact, they may like Reagan, but they never did anything to support his election. They have other motives, for the most part, social motives, friendship, motives, self-serving motives, positioning themselves. The fact is. That what happened in Pennsylvania and Georgia and Wisconsin and Michigan and Arizona and there are others. Was an abomination. We’ve never seen anything like this in our country’s history, never. And this is without a single fraudulent vote being cast before you get any of that. Before you get to any of it. You’ll hear. The media and the Democrats never trumper pseudo conservatives say, you know, there were 61 cases brought in, they lost 59 of them. First of all, the Trump campaign didn’t bring 61 cases. And a number of organizations and individuals and states brought the cases as well. But all cases are not equal. One case. Was the most important case of the bunch and the Supreme Court didn’t rule on it. Because President Trump would have won the presidency without dispute. Before the election. When it should have ruled and held up the United States Constitution, but they did not. So what use is there in having this structure that was created by our founders and supported by the the the framers and signed off on by the ratifiers? What’s the point of having a judicial system like this, if it’s in the back pocket of the left over and over and over and over again, despite the propaganda, the media now we have six conservatives on the court. We’ve never had six conservatives on the court, not in my lifetime. That is constitutionalists, not once. Not once we have a rogue chief justice. We have three political partisan activists. We have two cowards. Gorsuch. And Cavanough, and you’ve got Thomas and Alito, that’s it. Although I don’t know what happened on that Article two case, I don’t know where they are. I don’t know where anybody is. And so what they’ve created here now is what will be a cycle of controversy after controversy, after controversy, further splitting the nation apart. The failure of the United States Supreme Court to do its job, you know, frankly, in a more hideous way, you you had that situation prior to the civil war in the Dred Scott decision. No, I’m not comparing the two. Supreme Court, what I’m saying is. The Dred Scott decision. Was the icing on the cake. It was the fuel on the fire. There was an outrageous decision. The failure of the United States Supreme Court to uphold the United States Constitution in this election. May have pulled poor people on the far. It certainly didn’t resolve anything. It exacerbated things and their desire to want to stay out of politics or whatever it is, has just dragged them further into it. Honestly, I have no respect for that institution anymore. None, none. Forget about all the other cases, some of which were crucially important. That was the most important black and white, clear cut. Donald Trump would have been president of the United States without any controversy other than the usual Democrats squawking from the bleachers. Now we have. An outrageous electoral system where anything goes because by not acting, the court eliminated Article two, Section one, clause two, that’s the precedent. Don’t bother knocking on their. Steel doors, because they’re not going to answer. Good job, guys and gals. How preposterous how. How pathetic. To be perfectly honest about it, I’ll be right back.
Hour 1 Segment 2
So after the bottom of the hour, I want you to hear some of what took place at Senator Johnson’s hearing today. Information, they came out, Fox ran it live. Nobody else did, maybe. And then I don’t know, but none of the other larger channels because they’re into censorship, which is what you’re going to see throughout the next four years. If the final effort by the Trump forces is fails and what you’re going to see is censorship, what you’re going to see is what it’s like to live in a fascist or a communist regime with a media that that is not independent. You’re going to see efforts to destroy what opposition still exists and talk radio and other places. You’re going to see the Republican Party. We talked about this at some length the other day, revert back to old form the way it always does. It did it after college, actually, it did it after Grant, did it after college, did it after Reagan. And it’s going to do it again and it’ll revert back to form, which will mean it will die a not such a slow death anymore, a quicker death. Remember when the Tea Party came in and I was involved in that in a significant way? We had great patriots spontaneously, people rising up. We had sixty-six or so victories in the House of Representatives. Nobody ever saw anything like this. Obama was shaken to his to his toes. Big gains in the Senate. We were attacked by Karl Rove. We were attacked by the Republican establishment, attacked by Boehner and the rest of them, even though we delivered them huge numbers. The Republican Party hates outsiders, hates conservatives. It’s not so much a country club as it is a club of sorts and. We shall see how this navigates. I’ll be right back.
Hour 1 Segment 3
Tom Cruise is audio that don’t even give a damn about getting more attention than Hunter Biden on most channels. It’s not interesting. Mr. Producer, why does the Supreme Court care about student athletes getting compensated? And why is that a Supreme Court case out of 9000 or so cases that come to the court? Why are they taking that one? This is my whole point. My whole point. You have an issue that is core to our constitutional system. You have the violation repeatedly. Of our Constitution’s voting requirements. And the court is silent, but it takes up a student compensation. That’s why we’re all going to look at the court differently from now on. I mean, I was very critical. The court my first book, Men in Black, came out, I believe, in 2005. Now I have utter contempt, utter contempt for John Roberts and at least six of his colleagues. Utter contempt, I am fed up with the way some of these people get on the court by deceiving the president who appoints them and deceiving the people who fight to get them confirmed. And then they act like, well, you know, I’m greater than thou. I’m above it all. Now, you’re not greater than that and you’re not above it all. Unbelievable, unbelievable. The Democrats never in doubt, ever, ever, ever, ever. It’s the same thing in the Senate. You got this idiot McConnell. We’re going to be talking about McConnell in the second hour of this program. We’re going to have our friend Peter Schweizer on because we believe we need to get to the bottom of this communist China stuff wherever the chips fall. So be it. So be it. And of course, there should be a special counsel if you’re going to have a special counsel, investigate my president who did nothing in violation of Justice Department regulations that require some kind of criminal predicate, then by God, you’re going to have a special counsel investigate the Bidens. And I certainly hope the new acting attorney general, Rosen, does it and does it quickly. There is no justification, none whatsoever for failing to do so. None. This is what the special counsel regulation is all about. Joe Biden lied to us, he lied through his teeth, he has since he first stepped into the United States Senate, even before that, when he cheated on his exam in law school. But putting that aside. He lied to the American people that he didn’t know a thing about his son. We have e-mails galore. The media lied to the American people every damn newsroom in this country, bar one, lied to the American people. The Democrat Party lied to the American people, then they put out the Russian disinformation crap. The party. That sucked up the president of the Soviet Union is now using Russian disinformation. When it was Hillary Clinton. Effectively, who paid for a Russian spy? To write that dossier against the president. Aren’t they clever and you and I supposed to roll over? New York Times, what a rag. What a piece of crap, Washington Post, what a pathetic joke. CNN and MSNBC have been exposed. They don’t give a crap. They could care less, Gary Peters, is this really this nobody who defeated John James, so-called defeated same election system in Michigan where he would have been a great senator, he would have been a great senator, but he was another one of these clowns out there going on and on about Russia collusion, then Russia disinformation and so forth. Well, here he is today, today, cut one go during the 2016 election, we saw foreign disinformation campaigns trying to sow doubt about the integrity of our election. We’ve seen that before. And even then, certainly all the intelligence community in this country back that up. And so, in fact, this is rumor control page was actually created within your agency. You mentioned it in your testimony to address the foreign disinformation, having an impact on the election. So it seems as if Russia has simply used state controlled news outlets to basically push President Trump’s own statements and lies about a rigged election. Our adversaries don’t don’t don’t hear this asshole. So the Russians are using the allegations about the corruption on this election. So for this senator, the key here is that Donald Trump is feeding the Russians. And there are enough suckers in Michigan who buy this, they go and I’m going to vote for Pieter’s. Actually, what they say is, I’m going to vote Democrat, I don’t know what’s his name, Peter. Yeah, I vote for that guy. If any of you ever heard of Gary Peters. Ron Johnson had enough of it and he unleashed on this so big cut to go, and I just have to point out that the purveyors of Russian disinformation, Hillary Clinton’s campaign, the DNC, the Steele dossier, the ranking member, Peters, accusing Senator Grassley and I of Russian disinformation, that’s where the disinformation is coming. That’s where the false information, the lies, the false allegations. I can’t sit by here and listen to this and say that this is not disinformation. This hearing today, this is getting information we have to take a look at to restore confidence in our election integrity. We’re not going to be able to just move on without bringing up these irregularities, examining them and providing an explanation and see where there really are problems so we can correct it. Moving forward, Senator Paul. Mr. Mr. Chairman, I got to respond to that. I mean, you’re saying I’m putting it right? Well, one, I had nothing to do with this report. You lied repeatedly about you lied repeatedly in the press that I was spreading Russian disinformation. And that was an outright lie. And I told you to stop lying and you continue to do it. Mr. Chairman, this is not about airing your grievances. I know what I don’t know what rabbit hole you’re running down. You talked about Russia, his rationals. Senator Paul, is simply not what we’re doing. Well, Mr. Chairman, you can’t make your allegations and then drop it there. That is why Senator Paul needs to return back to our of partisan things. This is this is this is terrible what you’re doing to this committee and all the great work that you talk to. It is what you have done to this committee is not falsely accusing the chairman of spreading disinformation. Nothing could have been further from the truth. And you’re spouting it again, which is why I had Senator Paul. Good. And that’s the way it should be done. Isn’t Mitt Romney a member of this committee? Would you check that, Mr. Peterson? I don’t want to accuse Mitt Romney of doing anything that I shouldn’t accuse him of, but I don’t believe he was at this hearing today. Maybe he’s not a member of the committee. I think I’m right. But if I’m wrong, I want you to know Senator Rand Paul, who was superb, cut three, go out of the laws that have to be confirmed and I think reaffirmed our state laws. So it’s not in our purview, but the state laws are set and then we have federal elections. So what we’ve heard about what happened in Wisconsin, what happened in Nevada, I think is absolutely true. And we have to prevent it from happening again. I think state legislators, legislatures will need to reaffirm that election law can only be changed by a state legislature. So I think there’s a lot of work to be done while we will not dictate it to the states. I think we should have hearings going into the next year, hearing from state legislatures and what they’re going to do to make sure election law is upheld, not changed by people who are not legislators. And we do have an interest in that. I don’t want it to be federalized. Many on the other side of the aisle, we’re just seeing it mail everybody a ballot and we’ll have this universal corruption throughout the land. But what I think we need to do is keep it at the state level, but we can’t just say it didn’t happen and we can’t just say, oh, four thousand people voted in Nevada that were non-citizens and we’re just going to ignore it. We’re going to sweep it under the rug. So the courts have decided the facts. The courts have not decided the facts. The courts never looked at the facts. The courts don’t like elections. And so they stayed out of it by finding an excuse, standing or otherwise to stay out of it. But the fraud happened. The election in many ways was stolen, and the only way it’ll be fixed is by in the future, reinforcing the laws he’s right on. Good for him. Rand Paul’s exactly right. Haven’t even gotten to the fraud yet. We’re going to get to the. In a moment, just imagine what the meeting the Democrats would do if the shoe were on the other foot here. So they talk about peaceful transitions, but with their media be doing today, what would Jake Tapper be doing today? And and Fredo Cuomo. What with a liar Brian Williams be doing? What would the plagiarist, Michael Barnicle, be doing? Up with a banjo player on the bridge from Deliverance, Joe Scarborough, what would he be doing today? What with all these frauds, fools, buffoons, miscreants, malcontents, reprobates, you name it, at the New York Times and The Washington Post be doing Jeremy, what is that guy’s last name? I can’t remember his last name. I can’t remember his last name. Jeremy Jeremy. Jeremy Peters. And he does, by the way, did you know that anyway? James Troups is a former state judge, and he was he was the attorney in this Wisconsin case, goes all the way to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin, a four to three vote. And the dissent is withering. The dissent is withering. That this was a real case, that there was real fraud, that there was real violent violations of the Constitution. And in the majority opinion, for all they did is the usual bromides and platitudes about, well, this isn’t enough. We don’t see anything, understand something. I’ve read this to you many times say motion to dismiss is not easy to get. And yet they’re being handed out like lollipops by these courts. And so what happens? Professors and former federal prosecutors and media types look at this. Their case is so weak, they’re just thinking, I have no idea what they’re talking about. None. That same lying, filthy bastards in the media that brought us to this point are still at it. Not one of them has been fired. Not one of them. Not one of them has been suspended, not one of them for their serial lies and disinformation. When we come back, I want you to hear from this attorney. He’s a serious lawyer, a former state judge, James Troupers. We’ll be right back.
Hour 1 Segment 4
I have to move quickly so you can hear these two cuts before the top of the hour. So here’s attorney troops on behalf of the petitioners who went to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin. And four to three, they were unfortunately rejected, cut Fargo uniquely. We are able to examine actual envelopes that contain the ballots that are submitted by absentee voters. This allowed us to identify by person, by address, by ward. It’s not conspiracy. The real names are in the record. And here’s what we found. We found that there were incomplete and altered certificates. These are the certificates on the front of the envelopes that have to be exactly done correctly under our law. If not, those results may not be counted. How many of those more than three thousand of those identified by person were nonetheless counted, even though they are clearly invalid under the law? A second category, initials of clerks are placed on all of those envelopes. Why? Because the clerk identifies it as having been properly received and identification is provided. That’s the check in advance of the election. What did we find? More than two thousand of those ballots in Dane and Milwaukee County had no initials at all, but nonetheless, they got counted. We also have special laws in Wisconsin with regard to voting in advance. We do not allow advance voting. We allow in-person ended and other voting as absentee. So anything before Election Day is under our absentee rules. What did the city of Madison do? They created a system where people could arrive at a park hand in their ballots in envelopes five weeks before the election. They also created boxes, no controls at all, just boxes on corners that you could throw the ballot in no attempt at all in. Our statutes explicitly say there are only two ways to submit an absentee ballot in person or delivery to the clerk’s office. That’s it. Nothing else is allowed. And you have the city of Madison. We had twenty-eight thousand three hundred and ninety-five I’m sorry, seventeen thousand two hundred and seventy one ballots in this category that we identified. There are tens of thousands more because they commingled the ballots afterwards. So we couldn’t identify each one that may have been improperly cast. Unbelievable. And none of those should have been counted under the federal constitution either. Changes that were not made by the legislature cut five go. Then we have an interesting category called Indefinitely Confine. These are people which the statute read from the statute by age, physical illness or infirmity or are disabled indefinitely among those claiming this status. So they don’t have to provide any identification. Among those claiming the status is one of the electors for Joe Biden. He said, I can’t get to the polls. We have poll workers who claimed it. We have people who went to protest, people who had weddings, people who had vacations, all claimed this status. I can’t get to the polls. So they were able to vote without ID. There were twenty-eight thousand three hundred and ninety five people we explicitly identified. Finally, there are other categories in which as much as one hundred and seventy thousand other ballots were submitted without any application. In fact, they considered the certification envelope. The application, though a separate application is required by law. Three million people properly voted in the state of Wisconsin. More than two hundred thousand identified during this recount did not. But those votes got counted and our statute says they should not have been. That, in our view, is is a taint on our election in Wisconsin. Does that sound like a weak case to you, ladies and gentlemen? Does that sound like you haven’t shown us systemic fraud? Ladies and gentlemen, it’s all in his brief to the Wisconsin Supreme Court. How many newsrooms have read that brief? None. How many legal analysts have read this brief? Very few. Does that sound like a phony lawsuit to you, ladies and gentlemen? And then when you bring up numbers like this, they say, what are you going to disenfranchise these people? Well, maybe a lot of these people should be disenfranchised because under existing statutory law passed by the legislature, under the federal constitution, those votes would not have counted.