FOX News
Mark Levin: This is the new industrial revolution

Photo by Anna Moneymaker

The podcast for this show can be streamed or downloaded from the Audio Podcast page.

Rough transcription of Hour 1

Segment 1
Hello, America. Mark Levin here. Our number 877-381-3811.  877-381-3811. Data centers. That’s right. Data centers. I. Wow. I never thought would be this controversial. Asia data centers. How many of you use Tik Tok or Instagram or X? Hmm. How many of you use any social media? How many of you use a computer or a laptop or an iPad or an iPhone? Or any handheld device. How many of you watch TV? Particularly smart TV? Netflix. One of those other. Options that are available to you. Just curious. How many of you see a doctor? How many of you been to the hospital? How many of you drive a car or rent a car? How many of you taking an airplane? A train? How many of you use email? Hmm. Just curious. All of you need data centers. What do you think all this stuff runs through? The cloud. What do you think the cloud is? Their data centers. Data center. It just amazes me. How quickly? So many. If our fellow citizens fall for this stuff, it’s like the pandemic all over again. Six feet, six feet wears a mask. I mean, my own home, I live by myself. Six feet. Where? The mask. Now we have people who are Luddites. And I’m going to play a little bit for you what I played last night or what I said last night on Life, Liberty and Lavin. The President. This morning posted his full throated support again. For data centers. On the heels of my show and he watches the show. And I thank you for watching it as well. It’s a lot of competition, but there you are. It’s nothing to be afraid of. I love it when people said, Do you want a data center in your backyard? Mr. Producer said the dumbest damn thing you’ve ever heard. It is. No. And I don’t want a train station in my back yard or steel mill on my back yard or oil rigs in my back yard. I don’t want a skyscraper in my backyard, a steel mill in my backyard. A coal mine in my backyard. It’s not what backyards are for. Ladies and gentlemen. There are four, I repeat, four data centers within two miles of our home in Loudoun County, Virginia, and they’re all over the eastern part of Loudoun County, Virginia. And it is left to local governments, not the federal government, local governments. To decide where to put them in their various communities. The zoning boards, we call them, just as they would decide about oil pipelines or gas stations or strip malls. We don’t typically like commercial or industrial production in our backyard. So I don’t know what people are talking about. But you do like all this data. Because otherwise, ladies and gentlemen, you wouldn’t be able to function. In this data has to go and come from somewhere. Data in data out. Data into what? Data out from what? I just ask Brock a whole bunch of questions I just asked. Google a whole bunch of questions. I just really. And where do you think those answers come from? Whether you are a brain surgeon and a rocket scientist or whether you’re in seventh or eighth grade, where do you think they come from? Your accountants use. Use your accountant’s use. I. Your surgeons use A.I., your doctors with their laptop computers on their lap. They use A.I.. The pharmaceutical companies looking for. You know, cutting edge drugs and drugs to improve the quality of care they use. I. And tell me, can you list all the uses of air? It’s impossible. Civilian uses, military uses, transportation uses, health care use. It’s impossible. And so the more we use and the faster we want it. In order to accommodate that. These data centers are required. And what’s happening now. In our advanced industrial society. We’ve gotten so smart. We’re doing so much. That the data centers are necessary. To translate it. They help us study it and research it. They help bring us to rational conclusions and to do it as quickly as possible. Now that’s just us. If there wasn’t any other country on the face there, we’d still need this. But there are other countries on the face of the earth. China among. The most worrisome. And they want to use this technology in their data centers. To defeat us. To defeat us economically, to defeat us militarily, to defeat us in every possible way. And they have a command society, so it’s easier than ever. And look at these polls here. Frank Luntz has his polls coming out. Oh, yeah. Now I’m going to play a little bit of this for you and. I will be stopping and going from time to time. But mostly I’m going to I’m going to want you to listen, if you don’t mind. So put up the volume on your radio or however you are listening to the program and however you are listening to the program. Do you listen to podcasters? You do. I. Yes, you do. You, Dennis used to say. Oh, yeah. It’s true. I’m sorry. It’s nothing to be afraid of. What you should be concerned about is that we is that we don’t lag behind anybody else and that we win this race. So we’re the ones who determine. What computer chips in the future will look like. We’re the ones who determine what life generally is going to look like in the future, not communist China. But even within our own borders, as I’ve explained, this is an absolute 100% necessity. Now what happens is the Luddites, the people who don’t believe in industrial progress, they’re going to tell you you’re going to lose jobs. No, you’re not. The construction workers. The electricians, the plumbers, the roofers on and on and on building these centers while they’re temporary jobs. Whenever you finish a building, it may be temporary, may not be temporary. This doesn’t change any of that. What it does do is it creates massive numbers of jobs we can’t even contemplate or imagine right now. I mean, folks, the automobile replaced the horse and buggy. The computer replaced, you know, just a long math. I mean, we can go on and on with this. It’s so ridiculous. Look around you. Look at look at how fantastic this economy and this society is. Compared to future gen excuse me, past generations and compared to other countries, it’s not even it’s not even close. Can you imagine in the first industrial revolution in the early 1800s? Nah, I don’t want that over here, man. The cotton gin was in the first industrial. Now we can’t do that now. The second Industrial revolution. Oil. Now. Oil. Now, that was ugly oil. And they were burning off natural gas until Rockefeller decided, Wait a minute, we can put that to use, too. Then we had automobiles. Well, they had a gas and we had gas stations. We literally had people want to put an end to economic and industrial advancements. But it’s never going to happen, ever. Because what goes on between your ears should be the focus, not between your legs, but between your ears. Because there’s no stopping that in a free society. There’s no stopping it. There’s a reason why the blue states and some of the red states and now we don’t want to do this. We don’t want to because there’s politicians in charge and they’re looking at these polls. And here’s the problem. People are being fed a lot of lies about the cost of electricity and what’s happening with water. And they think the cost of electricity is skyrocketing because of a data center not too far down the road. That’s not what’s happening. They think their water is being polluted like with fracking, but it didn’t happen in fracking and it’s not happening now. And most of the water that’s used by these data centers is recycled by the data centers. It’s also unusable other water that they’re using. It’s not like they’re denying people water or fish water. But as usual, it takes time to explain progress. It takes time to explain conservatism, constitutionalism and economics. But we’re going to do it. I’ll be right back.

Segment 2
We may have to cut this off. How much time do we have, Ron, about, would you say about five? All right, let’s get it started. Here’s cut one. Fox last night. Go. Artificial intelligence and data centers. This is all the talk. But a lot of it is just talk. And we are surrounded by people who want you to be afraid of them. You have an iPhone. It was smart TV have an automobile. Really? All of that relates to artificial intelligence. In fact, virtually every aspect of your life is affected by artificial intelligence. That’s correct. Ever hear of a Luddite? Not just as a pejorative, A Luddite and Luddite was a title, a label given to people in the 1800s who opposed the first industrial revolution. And it carried through to the second industrial revolution that picked up after the Civil War and worked its way into the early 1900s. And now we have the great powerful United States of America, an economy we call. Capitalism. We discussed that last evening. But we have Luddites who oppose economic advancement, technological advancement, even in medicines and so forth. They talk about, well, what’s going to happen to jobs Like jobs are stagnant. Like, people never get fired or we never create new businesses that create all these jobs and so forth. And so on the one hand, people attack. Capitalism is not being dynamic enough. On the other hand, they attack capitalism for being too dynamic. Ignore these carnival barkers, ladies and gentlemen. Luddites. Luddites are people who oppose technological and industrial progress and advancement. The United States wouldn’t be what we are today, the number one superpower. But for these industrial revolutions that took place in capitalism minds me the isolationist today. And you’ll notice that some of the Luddites are also isolationists, and many of them are in the Republican Party, for crying out loud. Isolationist wants an isolationist. They reject most foreign and military alliances. That’s kind of stupid, isn’t it? Very. Didn’t we deal with that in 1938? The result was World War Two. And then and then we actually lost over 400,000 men and women to fight that war. Yes, that did happen. So in the 1920s and thirties, we were dealing with isolationist. You know, we’re dealing with today isolationist and Luddites. It’s crazy, but it’s true. And by the way, that isolationist movement died after we were attacked at Pearl Harbor. And one of the leaders of what was then called the America First movement, believe it or not, was Charles Lindbergh. He apologized to the nation. He became one of the great leaders in raising money through government bonds for the war effort. He was also a rabid anti-Semite. So this is a history we have a history that we’re seeing play out today. But I want to get into this A.I. and these data centers because we are surrounded by cowards, cowards in the Democrat Party. More ideological, I suppose, and cowards in the Republican Party who are telling us who are telling us that these data centers, these data centers are nothing but trouble. Nothing but trouble. And let me tell you something. This is the new industrial revolution with these data centers. You’ve got New York Kathy Hochul enacting an executive order temporarily, a one year pause in all data centers. You’ve got Georgia lawmakers introducing bills to forbid local governments from permitting new data centers through 2028. In Virginia, where there’s the most data centers and have created the most wealth and reduction in taxes and so forth. They have proposals to delay final approvals for new facilities. Other states. They’re also trying to prevent data centers from being built. Delaware. Michigan. Pennsylvania. South Carolina. Vermont. Introduced moratorium or impact study bills to slow them down. Other states where they’re trying to stall them. Minnesota. New Hampshire. Oklahoma. South Dakota. Wisconsin. Maine. They proposed a moratorium that was recently vetoed by the governor there. So we have a lot of Luddites out there and big positions, Republicans and Democrats, governors and legislatures, even at the national level. Even in the Republican Party on TV, it’s endless. The ignoramuses are all around us. Winslet. We’re going to we’re going to kill it right here. And pick up as soon as we come back. I want you to hear this. I want you to be more informed than anybody else. That’s what we do on the Mark Levin program here on radio. That’s what we do on Life, Liberty and Levin. And that’s what we do in my books. This will be no different. This is the new industrial revolution. Somebody is going to win it. It better be us. Oh, and by the way, this is where the the finding is the inventions for things like fighting cancer and heart disease and so forth. This is where it’ll be found.

Segment 3
All right. Let us continue. Cut to go. Let’s start with electricity, which is arguably the most difficult data center issue, right, at least in the future. Several regional and national studies have found little merit to the common claim that data centers have already caused large localized increases in America’s electricity bills. You know, this reminds me of fracking for a better time. Oh, it’s destroying the water. No, it’s not. Oh, the amount of energy that you use is the same as you get from the fracking. No, it’s not. In fact, a brand new peer reviewed study found that data centers actually cost average U.S. retail electricity rates to fall modestly between 2015 and 2024. Why? Because the center is high. Steady power demand helps spread a grid’s fixed cost over more usage. This finding is counterintuitive, but consistent with the research from 2025 that high demand areas, including ones like North Dakota and Virginia, saw an explosion of data centers, also saw, quote, lower prices overall, while prices rose in places like California where demand had declined. Funny thing. Supply and demand more power customers, the Washington Post explains. Needs more ways to divvy up fixed costs, thus reducing rates for everyone. They go on. What about water? You know, I could have done five shows on this. I could have done this whole show on this. But I’m in a hurry because we have good guests on other subjects. But I want to give you enough information where you can go look on your own. As The Washington Post editors noted last year, arguably the most viral water claim that a single Google data center in Chile consumed more than a thousand times the water supply. But down there was later acknowledged by its author, to be, quote, off by a magnitude of 1000. They added that the US data centers combined use less than 0.5 percent of America’s fresh water, and that, quote, Google’s thirstiest facility in Iowa uses approximately what some golf courses use. The golf course comparison is that because it hints at a common trick data center, opponents used to gin up local angst, offer scary sounding numbers with no real world comparatives. The American Enterprise Institute, Jim Pethokoukis recently did such a comparison revealing data center water usage to be a relative non-issue. AI researcher Andy Measly has done yeoman’s work explaining why a lot of data center water usage stats in various studies include non-potable water, indirect usage from nearby power plants and water actually recirculated instead of consume that’s causing little change in local supplies. Doing this can inflate water usage stats, so they’re using stats involving water that you’re never going to drink now. You’re never going to bring it to your house in any in any of the appliances you’re never going to swim in. And that’s public outcry dramatically, even though the data center itself isn’t consuming much water at all and nearby locals aren’t effective. The other big problem with most data center opposition said it routinely ignores the benefits they bring to local communities and the nation as a whole. The easiest place to look is Northern Virginia, specifically eastern Loudoun County, where 70 to 80% of these centers are. And he goes on about the incredible impact on the tax base that taxes may well have doubled. Without this, these data centers and so forth. But what is the benefit to you, Mr. and Mrs. America? I always say capitalism creates all these benefits and we take them. We take them for. For granted. Artificial intelligence is used today across daily life health care, business, transportation to automate tasks, analyze data, make fast decisions for you. To improve your life. Tools like Siri and Alexa manage schedules, set reminders, enter voice commands. That’s air streaming services, and online stores use algorithms to suggest movies, music and products that say apps like Google Maps uses AI for real time traffic updates, route planning and estimated arrival times. Email providers use AI to filter spam, sort mail or of complete sentences. What about health care? This is a biggie. A.I. models review medical images like X-rays and scans to spot early signs of diseases or emergencies like strokes. Computer algorithms speed up the creation and testing of new medicines. Wearable devices like tracking heart rates and vital signs to warn users of potential health issues. That’s air over a tabloid icon from robotics and hospitals and clinics to predictive software used to diagnose rare diseases. As many users in the field of health care for you, Mr. and Mrs. America, doctors and medical staff work with AI powered software to provide better care to patients of all types. Early Diagnosis. Hey, I can analyze patient and disease data to predict the likelihood of a single patient you developing a disease and either diagnosed early or helped to prevent it entirely. Disease Tracking Using Predictive Analytics. I can model how a contagious disease could spread over the course of time or across a specific area. Drug discovery models can discover new applications or potentially harmful interactions between different types of drugs. Diagnosis. Things that are invisible to the human eye might be missed. Hey, I can pick up and it goes on. In all these examples. You’ve got others with AI. Scientists can now analyze genomic data at an unprecedented scale. Algorithms trained on massive databases are uncovering mutations linked to everything from Alzheimer’s disease to rare genetic syndromes. More importantly, they are identifying combinations of genetic variations that increase disease risk patterns so complex they would be invisible to the human eye. There’s no way to explain this, folks, other than to explain it. We’ve got one more clip. We’re on a roll. Let’s hate it that we could talk about it after the break. Cut three. Go take Cancer Genomics, for example. Our models are helping to differentiate between driver mutations, those that cause cancer and passenger mutations, those that are incidental. This distinction is critical, and it helps oncologists target the real culprits and design more effective, individualized treatment plan. All these scientists, doctors, labs are using AI to great effect in the medical field, and you are going to find in the years ahead cures that you never even thought were possible in some of the most horrific diseases that mankind gets. But none of this is going on to the extent it can go on on these states that are banning it or creating red tape and bureaucratic obstacles to it. I’ve got the Cleveland Clinic analysis here. We have what is it does interpret images to identify broken bones, brain aneurysms, other concerns, tracked nodules over time to detect cancer flag potential concerns that might otherwise be overlooked. Support diagnostic decision making. It’s supporting research and innovation, developing new medications to understand how diseases work. Discover biomarkers. Yeah, moving fast because the amount that air is doing is really infinite. Combined patient data uncover larger health trends, make clinical trials more efficient by identifying ideal participants and flagging earlier results. What else is it doing? National Security. Open source intelligence, it’s able to pull together, filter enormous amounts of information. Also, it applies the history, the experience and battlefield activities to what’s taking place. Open source intelligence and analyze that signal intelligence table at breakneck speed. Analyze that. Tradecraft automation, Advanced machine learning models and so forth. Cyber security. Critical infrastructure. Defense. Real time detection. Autonomous agents. Local grid Protection against attacks. Predictive Threat Analysis. It’s tracking illicit funding. Pattern recognition. Battlefield operations and Tactical edge. Autonomous reconnaissance. Contested environments. Predictive maintenance. It goes on and on. I’ve got page after page. Page after page. And guess what’s happening right now? The gap between the United States and China. It’s getting much, much smaller. Why? Well, for one. We have the Luddites who are preventing in certain states and certain communities. The advancement of A.I. and data centers, the boogeyman. And so now the communist Chinese is not worried about democracy. They don’t have to worry about voting. They don’t have to worry about polls, and they’re not. And the gap is tightening in some areas there now. Advancing beyond us. And this is a big, big problem. It’s pointed out here in Newsweek. China is in a race with the United States to dominate the era from the diffusion of its own A.I. models worldwide to setting the standard for governance. Beijing has never been in a stronger position to lead, and a low cost propaganda campaign on X on Twitter is only one small sign that it’s apparently willing to do whatever it takes. Trying to slow the expansion of America’s data centers is one way China is working to get ahead. Its next target may be the American power grid on which those data centers and AI firms so heavily rely. China is out to win, they point out. Artificial intelligence is at the center of the next industrial revolution. China’s leaders have named it a key frontier technology, signaling its readiness to devote more resources, including generous subsidies toward its more successful players. China isn’t arguing about data centers. It needs AI to reignite its stagnant economy. Its homegrown AI players matter because their success and only affects global could fundamentally alter its core growth engine for the rest of the century. And they intend to be number one, and they intend to defeat us. What about jobs? It creates jobs. I data centers, not just the building of the data centers, which creates all kinds of blue collar jobs, people say, but they’re temporary. Well, whenever you’re building buildings, it’s temporary residential, you know, communities or skyscrapers or roads or. Okay, that there’s more than that. There’s the creation of businesses and services that grow out of artificial intelligence. And again, that’s infinite. Things that are unimaginable today, but some that are imaginable today in all kinds of fields and so forth and so on. There has to be a pushback in our country against the war on capitalism, against the war on data centers, the new industrial revolution. There has to be a pushback against these Luddites, against the socialists, these Marxists in foreign policy, against these isolationists. We know what they propose doesn’t work. We know what they propose will damage our country. We know this to be the case. So the next time you hear a politician say, I’m against AI data centers. Ask him if he has an iPhone. Drives a car. Well, a thousand other things in their life. And if I were you, I wouldn’t rely on politicians when it comes to really anything. All right, I’m back alive. Let me check. Yes, I am. We’ll take a break now. Then we’ll have a little chat. We’ll be right back.

Segment 4
You know, I asked myself the question, how would the most advanced society and economy. On the face of the earth, survive as such without air in data centers. Mr. Producer. I can’t even understand how this would work. How would the most advanced society and economy. In the entire world. In the world. I just don’t. How would the most advanced society survive? Without air and data centers. I mean, the fact is jobs would be lost. No. Right. Foreign governments, Foreign, foreign, other countries would be it. You know, other countries aren’t going to stop. Other countries would. But our producers set out. I mean, I’m just sitting here just trying to figure this out. How would this work? Exactly. No more data centers. Meaning air is stopped in its tracks. How would this work? It wouldn’t work. So what is it that these people want? They’re never forced to ask. And I notice online they try to intimidate people, threatening people, name calling, ins, people. You make well, you’re calling them Luddites. Luddite is an actual word. It’s a noun. Check it out. It’s a historic term. That applied to those who opposed. Industrial advancement. That’s what it was until you can include technological advancement. So are you comfortable putting the brakes on all this? How are we going to find new cures for cancer, heart disease, kidney disease and a thousand other things? And how are we supposed to turn off the human brain? I’m just curious how this is going to work. You’ll see a flow. You know, people say, why are we giving all these STEM jobs to foreigners yet? We’ll see a flow of STEM jobs, you know, science, technology and so forth overseas like you’ve never seen before in your life. I mean, it’s it is bizarre. If you ask me, you didn’t. But I’m just telling you. Crazy. And and I worry about it. People are now saying, you if we lose, it’s because of this. I thought if we lose, it’s because of Iran. Mr. Producer. I mean, Iran. You see, what we have are the Luddites and the isolationists, many of whom are the same people. Many of whom are the same people. They act like people who want to, you know, work in a bubble. Well, then let them go to work in a bubble. That’s not us. That’s not who we are. There’s something called human interaction. I’m desperately looking for that, Mr. Producer, and I can’t find it. So we’re going to have to start at the top of the next hour. I don’t know what the hell happened to that. See if I can find it. I don’t think I have enough time. Bear with me, America. Count the seven, would you, please? Why seven? I don’t know. But I misplace something and my desk is a medicine I can’t find. We’re going to have to wait. But think about what I’m telling you. Most of us don’t know how all this stuff works. I don’t pretend to. But I do know. The manner in which it transmits. In other words, you don’t just turn on the can. Look at all this information I have. It comes from somewhere. It comes from these data centers, the cloud, they call them the cloud. Oh, I remember the cloud, Yes. Sounds so nice, but it’s utterly irrelevant. The cloud, these massive buildings with the most sophisticated and fastest computers on the face of the earth. Constantly generating information, generating information. Now they’re putting them to even better use. To have them figure out stuff. I had them figure out stuff. And in the fastest way possible. With access to endless amounts of data and algorithms and so forth and so on, not just in our country, but around the world. And they can access public data. They can access data from other institutions if that’s available to where they can seek that information. If they want things that are so far above any individual or group of individuals heads. It’s unimaginable. You know, these invented drugs. They don’t come from nowhere. They come from somewhere. Same with all these things that you use in your daily life, in your daily life. Most of you use social media. Okay. That’s how I. The so much of the more sophisticated aspects of your vehicle that say I and I get go on and on, but I won’t. We’ll be right back.

Photo by Selcuk Acar/Anadolu

Photo by Ronaldo Bolaños/Los Angeles Times

The podcast for this show can be streamed or downloaded from the Audio Podcast page.

Photo by John Lamparski

Rough transcription of Hour 1

Segment 1
Hello America.  Mark Levin here. Our number 877-381-3811.  877-381-3811. We are packed. We are ready. We are loaded. I’m not actually loaded. I don’t drink. But you get the point. You know, I decided to do something here that I suppose most people won’t do. Certainly not this business. There’s this great debate going on about the president’s executive order. On mail in integrity. And there’s been litigation and the slip and fall lawyers for the Democrats, you know, they’ve been pounding their chests, making declarations. The Democrat attorneys general have made it a cause celeb on what the hell is in this executive order. That’s causing all this kerfuffle. Because you and I, well, we’ve been around long enough to know that when the Democrats conduct themselves this way, it must be pretty good. That is it must really? Really. Prevent fraud. Because we know the Democrats support front. So let me let me go through this with you. I haven’t read it yet. I’ll go through it with you. It’s March 31, 2026. Executive Order 14399. Now the Supreme Court so far has upheld this. Now there’s more litigation to come, but the United States Postal Service has instituted this, as it should. It’s a quasi part, if you will, of the executive branch. Let’s go through this. By the authority vested in me as president by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including the Help America Vote Act of 2002, now the Help America Vote Act of 2002. Would have passed and but put in place during the Bush administration. Right. So it’s national law. The National Voter Registration Act of 1993, 1993. I don’t believe Trump was president then either. That is 52 U.S.. You know, it’s part of the code. Both of these are part of federal law and the federal government constitutional obligation to guarantee a Republican form of government to every state in the union. There would be Article four, Section four. It is hereby ordered Section one. The right to vote in federal elections is reserved exclusively for citizens of the United States under the Constitution and federal law. Federal statutes explicitly prohibit non-citizens from registering to vote or voting in federal elections and impose criminal penalties for violations. And they cite four criminal statutes. And the Social Security Administration maintains records that, in conjunction with the Department of Homeland Security’s systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements program under another federal law, can assist in verifying identity and federal election voter eligibility. So far, so good, right, Rich? So this is a perfectly legitimate cause. The federal government has an unavoidable duty under Article two of the Constitution to ensure and to enforce federal law, which includes preventing violations of federal criminal law and maintaining public confidence in election outcomes to enhance election integrity via the United States mail. Additional measures are necessary. Secure ballot envelope identifiers provide a reliable, auditable mechanism to enforce federal law without unduly burdening or infringing on the rights of eligible voters. Unique ballot envelope identifiers such as barcodes enable confirmation that only citizens receive and cast ballots, reducing the risk of fraud and protecting the integrity of federal elections. So you see right there, the Democrats are losing their heads. Say what you’re going to do. What you’re going to be able to track to make sure. That the mail really the ballots actually go to the person who is supposed to vote and that they’re a citizen as they cross-check it with the Social Security Administration and DHS, whom I brought. What’s next, Mr. Producer? Flock Cameras. Yes. You know, you operate under the assumption, Mr. and Mrs. America, that the the voters are going to be voting legally and legitimately, but not the Democrats. Section two of the President’s Executive order, Establishment and transmission of state citizenship lists and prioritization of investigations and prosecutions related to election fraud. A To the extent feasible and consistent with applicable law, including but not limited to the Privacy Act of 74. The Secretary of Homeland Security to the Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service or. Citizenship and Immigration Service are in coordination with the commissioner of the Social Security Administration, shall take appropriate action to compile and transmit to the chief election official of each state a list of individuals confirmed to be U.S. citizens who will be above the age of 18 at the time of an upcoming federal election, and who maintain a residence in the subject state State of citizenship. The state citizenship list shall be derived from Federal citizenship and Naturalization. Let’s see here. Records. Social Security records. Save data in other relevant federal databases. The state citizenship list shall be updated and transmitted to the state election officials no fewer than 60 days before each regularly scheduled federal election or promptly upon request by a state in connection with any special federal election. And it goes into further details that are not permanent for what I’m doing. BE for purposes of this order, an individual is eligible to vote in a federal election if the individual is a citizen of the United States 18 years of age or older, by the date of the upcoming election and otherwise qualified under the laws of his or her state. And it goes into this and it cites numerous federal statutes one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine. Oh. Section three, United States Postal Service, rulemaking on mail in and absentee ballots. The unlawful use of the mail in connection with that elections is prohibited in various federal statutes, and they cite four of them. B to ensure the faithful execution of federal law protect the integrity of the mail is a medium for transmitting federal election ballots and establish uniform standards to mail in or absentee ballot services implemented throughout the United States. With the United States Postal Service is hereby no. No way. Even gentlemen. I tried to print something 2 hours ago. Uh oh, Mr. Producer. Do you hear this? Ladies and gentlemen. I think we have on the air a lifetime court for the first time in American history. A guy at work. Oh, yes, Mr. Potter. It’s printing now. How do you explain this? You think it’s Russia? Yes. To be Look at this late in general. I don’t know how much noise you’re going to hear in the background. I’m not kidding. I told my producer when the show star printer’s not working and I’ve been trying for an hour to print stuff and it’s printing. I don’t believe there’s a data center near where I am, Mr. Produce or flat cameras, for that matter. But we will do a quick search tomorrow and see what’s what’s up. I will continue. I hope this doesn’t pester you too much, but it is what it is. Anyway, it goes on and among other things, they’ll check voting lists, which is required by federal law and has been required by federal law for several decades now. And they have proposed procedures to enable each state to routinely supplement and provide suggested modifications and so forth. So as you can see, there is nothing threatening. There is nothing obstructing people from voting who are supposed to be are free to vote. There’s none of this. This is all really vanilla. But for the Democrats, this is a grave threat. It’s a great threat because they really don’t believe in one man. Woman transitioning what have you, and one vote. They don’t really believe in that. And so. They oppose this. So I just wanted you to know this mail in executive order is perfectly legitimate. It makes clear that they’re not going to permit or they’re going to try and fight any effort to violate, you know, the the voting, the mail in voting system in federal elections. It doesn’t violate federalism. It doesn’t violate state authority. It it ensures that federal law is complied with and the federal Constitution is complied with. And the Democrats you know, I blame the media, too. The media could break down what I was reading more at length and they could even report it in that people make up their own minds, but they’re never going to do that. Instead, you have Donald Trump is trying to prevent people from voting, especially women who he can’t define and people of color. No, he’s not. He’s not doing any of that. I’ll be right back.

Segment 2
Welcome back. Islamic scholar, so-called Dr. Abdullah bin Hamid Ali. At the Dar Al Hijrah. I have no idea what that is. Fairfax County, Virginia, right outside of Washington, D.C., the largest county in the state of Virginia. June 2026, by my calculation, just two months ago. At the Muslim Political Candidates forum. She says they will rid America. Our government of Zionists control. That’s the Jews, of course. We’ve imported very sick people. Bigots, racists, Jew haters, Christian haters, America haters. We’ve imported them. They call themselves scholars and directors and doctors and so forth and so on. You know what they’re teaching. Their children. The children of others. In these facilities, in these segregated fortresses. And people are going to find out. Sadly, we in this country. We’re going to find out what this is like. When the Israelis have told us over and over again, you don’t understand there’s a culture here, there’s an indoctrination here and other differences in our country there in our country. They’re here. Here right now. Hat tip memory mmr i dot org. I want you to listen and you make it up. This is just 60 days old. That’s it. Fairfax, Virginia, right outside of Washington, D.C., heavily populated with bureaucrats and Islamists. Got it. Cut one go. I think that the Muslims who are in politics are people, Muslims who are trying to take away power from other people, have to realize that those people are not going to give up their power easily, but they’re not going to give up their power easily. Even like right now, people were actually like, listen, we need we’re trying to rid the American government of Zionist control. And, you know, just just so you don’t they sound like a traitor. Tucker, Qatar, listen to. Thomas Massie. Marjorie Schrader. Gangrene. Don’t they sound like these people? Go ahead. Go easily. Not enough. They’re going to fight hard, right? They’re got to fight hard to maintain their power because their power has been around. They’ve had this power for decades or perhaps even a century. To be totally honest. Right. So if you think about it in terms of like the banking system, a rambling jackass, Dr. Abdullah bin Hamid Ali. Islamic scholar. Go ahead, Tina. Some federal reserves in the IRS are created. Right. I mean, they have been really, you know, significant power a very long time. What about the Jews create they created the Federal Reserve in 1913, Mr. Wilson. Yeah. I got to say, we Jews have done an awful lot that I wasn’t aware of. I have to confess. Isn’t this sick? Every day the Jews and Israel. And it’s a tiny country with 9 million people. Jews in this country make up a small percentage of the population, 15 million people worldwide, 2 billion Muslims. And this constant just it’s it’s an ending assault. It’s just unbelievable. Go ahead. Russia I mean, there are other, you know, countries who are much more well positioned to actually take over before Muslims are. And Muslims. I feel that Muslims are just not mature enough. Right. To be leadership. And anybody’s claiming that the reason that the world is turning on the Zionist right now had to do with something that Muslims did right, is a great grand strategy We have. No, it wasn’t. It just our laws and working. Right. Right. Know in favor of the oppressed, the dominant. Some of them, the oppressed, the oppressed. Their press is being answered as guys get an IQ of have a cucumber falls back on the slogans of Marxism. And they all do. All the Islamists fall back on the slogans of Marxism. Why do they do that? Because Khamenei, the first one, and I know they’re spelled differently, pronounced differently, but it’s close enough. We’re not splitting beards here. Khomeini. Use the language of Marxism. To appeal. To appeal to the world and to appeal to the West. So that’s why you hear him using oppress and oppressor and so forth and so on. So they use the language of Marxism. To advance the cause, the cause of seventh century barbarism. Seventh century barbarism. This is a an ideology that’s been around for a mere 1400 years. Christianity has been around several thousand years. Judaism, the oldest, has been around almost 4000 years. It’s just. I’ll be right back.

Segment 3
We have more on this worldwide thing that’s going on all throughout our country and all throughout Europe. Ten, 20 years ago. You wouldn’t have believed it if I told you this was once when the damn auntie said, Well, what’s with you always bringing that up? I don’t have to always bring it up. I’m just playing what these people are saying. In the US. The people in Britain. If this is just an anti Jew thing in Britain, You ask the people in France. You ask the people in Africa if this is just an anti juicing, has them as the people in Syria, as the people in Yemen, 99% of which is Muslim, but not the right Muslims, you see. Ask them if it’s just the Jew thing. Judaism is under attack. Christianity is under attack. And Muslims. Who do not buy into Islamism. They’re under attack, too. And most of the people in power in our country are sitting on their thumbs. What can we do? Do you want me to? Yeah. Hey. Hey. They’re commentators now. I’m a commentator. They’re elected officials. They’re public officials. Ever public trust? So here’s a British Islamic scholar. You notice they’re all scholars. Boy, what a scholar. That guy. So smart. With the Jews and the Jews and the Jews like this. This guy is a scholar. British Islamic scholar Azhar Rashid. At the Manchester conference. In the UK like three weeks ago. Manchester’s been taken over. May I say that? I think I did. Got to go. Palestine is not the homeland for the Jews. Palestine is a homeland for the Muslims. It is the land. No, no, no, no. To every corner, the globe. It’s a homeland for the Muslims. Don’t you understand? London. Manchester. Oh, yeah. Yorkshire. As we work our way across continents. That’s right. Nigeria. America. That’s right. Go ahead. They’d have been algebra, had the law and the Sahaba ultimately done under the guidance of say, Do not Omar al-Farouq conquered that land. And if you say a two state solution, a normal kaiama, you will answer after a lie. Sumana With the ATA we ask a lasso banana with the question. I don’t understand what the hell guys are saying, but it’s not good. Go ahead. Victory to the Mujahedeen. Cause, then philosophy. The Mujahideen. I’ve heard of that before. Yeah, go ahead. Able to overthrow Muslims. To overthrow a Zionism. Finish the state of Israel. It doesn’t deserve to exist in Palestine. They can move it to Germany if they want. Or to the United States of America. Thank you. How about you move? You move back to whatever rat hole you crawled out of. And where would that even be? Quite frankly. What would that be? In one of the ten countries created by the Ottoman Empire and then the British. I don’t know. Where would that be? Isn’t that fine? Well, let me ask you this. If the Jews were not the original inhabitants of the Holy Land, who was? Who was. I mean. Christians, evangelical Christians, other Christians, they get it. The Old Testament is what you call the Torah and then the New Testament. The Bible is about two thirds to three fourths of the Old Testament and throughout the New Testament, Jews are mentioned. Jesus. The Apostles. Prophets. And so if the Jews are not, the original inhabitants of the Holy Land, understand what I’m saying? America, that means Judaism and Christianity. Judaism and Christianity should not exist. Or just get out of there because, you see, the third of the three religions came along 1400 mere years ago. And it’s their land. All of it. Every single bit of it. Well, what happened to the Christians in the Middle East? They’re largely gone. Any thriving communities in the state of Israel. Certainly not in Egypt. Where the Coptic Christians are treated like crap. Certainly not in Syria where they’re killed. Our no friend. That’s right. Used to head Al Qaida in Syria. He’s a good guy. Now he’s working with our buddy Aerogarden in and Turkey with his F-35 desires and all that. Yeah, he’s. He’s good guy, that guy. To the Jews have to get out of Palestine. Hence the name of the Palestinians. They need to get help. And why is this guy in London? Actually, Manchester. Is he a native to Manchester, Mr. Producer. Yeah, I doubt it too. I doubt it, because if the Islamists were required to do what they tell everybody else to do, they’d they’d occupy a tiny little corner of some dark part of the planet. That’s it. Because they weren’t the first anywhere. It’s impossible for the Islamists to have been the first anywhere on the planet. Anywhere. It’s like reparations. You’ve got this guy outside in Michigan. Talking about reparations. Here’s a guy. Second generation in our country, another one who’s from Egypt, the home of the Muslim Brotherhood, may I add. And. Talking about reparations for slavery. It’s been pointed out by many. I’m not an original or unique in this regard, but I think it’s a good point. When it comes to slavery. The biggest slave owners. Throughout our history. Have not been white Europeans. They haven’t been Americans. Muslims. Muslims enslaving Muslims, Muslims enslaving Christians, Muslims enslaving Jews, Muslims enslaving Europeans. Oh, it’s true. It’s true. If you get off tech talk and actually read about it, you’ll see. So it seems to us, we the people. That, Mr. Saeed. And other Islamists that they owe a lot of money to a lot of people going way, way back. Way back. Mm hmm. But that’ll never come up. Let’s go back to the British Islamic scholar, Ashraf Rashid. Go ahead. Oh, he’s done. It’s just that just starting to understand, you know, about Arabs and Rashad and say what they we’re. But. Mosques in Britain are filled with his likes. Can I be perfectly honest with you? I always am. If mosques were not becoming hotbeds. A pro violence protester. You know, imams and their followers. Nobody would care. We wouldn’t care. I wouldn’t care. Now we get some Muslims down the street. Okay. Who cares? What do I care? But the problem is. What’s being preached and believed. That’s the problem. So in your own neighborhood, you’re looked at funny. Or in your own neighborhood, you’re being intimidated with people actually praying in the streets in front of your businesses and homes. Or demands that school boards. About certain types of practices that should take place in our schools. And on and on. And. On our groups like CARE, CAIR. They’re out there pushing a radical terror supporting agenda. That’s right. I said it and I’ve been saying it for 25, ten years. Nobody would care. If it was live and let live. But it’s not live and let live. It’s live and get killed. And honestly. And no, I’m not doing this for. For self-aggrandizement. If I hadn’t been behind this microphone pointing this out year after year, I don’t know where the hell we’d be, honest to God. Right now, we’re in deep trouble. Our backs against a wall. I really believe this because I’m not sure we have a ruling class that knows how to deal with this or is capable of dealing with it. I suspect this will be passed down and passed down and passed down till it’s too damn late. But never, never will it ever be said. That the American people weren’t alerted to this. Never. Because we are. The question is whether we have the will to survive. And whether the people we put in office have the will to do something about this. It’s clear that half, give or take, the country has already lost their will. And in fact. Perhaps part of that half is actively seeking the destruction of the country. And I’m believing a bigger and bigger part of that half, whether it’s the Marxists or the Islamist. I’ll be right back.

Segment 4
The Canadian broadcasters do not refer to 911 as a terror attack leak. Canadian broadcaster Memo instructs reporters. Canada’s gone. It’s completely gone, America. The jackasses attacking our president for fighting the Canadians or what they’re doing to our products with their massive They have massive tariffs on dairy. Massive tariffs on paper and lumber. It’s just it’s significant. And he was negotiating with Trump with them to try and bring them down. And they walked away. But the level. Of Islamist control over that country is beyond belief. You know, it’s like they are. Trudeau. Now they have this. This current jackass, what’s his name? CANARY whatever the hell his name is. Carney I think it is actually. Mark Carney Remember, Art Carney was a comedian, but nonetheless. They used to have some pretty good prime ministers there, but not anymore. Do not refer to 9/11 terror attacks. Leaked Canadian Broadcaster Memo Instructs reporters. So how did the 25th anniversary of 911 CBC journalists were reportedly told to avoid describing the attacks as terror attacks? Drawing criticism in Canada. No, no kidding. This was the first it was first reported by Canadian journalist Warren Kinsella. He received the memo. It was then confirm the existence of the memo to the Jerusalem Post. I’m glad to see the American media is all on top of this. Good for us, which we’re not. That’s the point. And yet 911 happened here. Cohen added a screenshot of the memo shared by Kinsella. It was authored by Basim Basharat. Wonder what kind of name that is rich. Senior director of journalistic standards and Public Trust. Oh, yeah, that’s great. At the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. And then they show you in bold letters. Basra stage. The attacks are not to be referred to as terrorist attacks. He then said that that, quote, the hijackings led to passenger jet crashes in Washington, D.C., Pennsylvania, Manhattan, the World Trade Center was destroyed. So he’s giving them the propaganda that they are to use. CBC spokes idiot Kerri Kelly told The Post that it is the practice of the CBC to, quote, exercise extreme caution before using the words terrorist and terror. Oh my God. If that’s not terrorism. Then terrorism doesn’t exist. I got to wonder how the families feel who lost family members on that day when they watch what’s being said. By people like Hassan Puka, somebody who’s in this country who’s influencing a candidate for the Senate. An influencing. College students. And then you have the official I don’t know what it is association or whatever the hell it is for the Canadian broadcasting. Corporation. Telling journalists not to call this an act of terrorism on 911. Quote. The memo was a reminder of the long standing practice that favors the use of these terms with attribution in our reporting. Attribution. Everybody’s dead, you idiot. While the language is not seriously disputed, in some cases it’s less clear, if not a highly contested rather. I don’t even know what to say. I don’t even know what to say. Canadian MP Rachel Thomas. See the Conservatives there? They’ve been out of power a long time. They are disgusted with what’s going on in their country, what’s happening to their country. But it’s a parliamentary system, much like the Democratic Socialists of America demand. So there’s no brakes on this. There’s no brakes. B r AK Yes, there are no brakes. CBC, she said. It’s absolutely shameful. It is choosing to redefine terrorism in a way that downplays the atrocity of 911. Refusing to call it an act of terrorism dishonors the victims, their family men, the survivors and the first responders who witnessed the horrors of that day. 911 was an act of terrorism full stop. The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation is the public broadcaster for both radio and television in Canada received over 1.5 billion in taxpayer funding. 2025 to 2026. Between the left and the Islamists. And they’re all in the media as well. The insanity just spreads like poison. It truly does. I’ll be right back.